MovieChat Forums > The Roman Spring of Mrs. Stone (1961) Discussion > how much of the terrible narration would...

how much of the terrible narration would I have to sit through?


I just started watching this and got interrupted, so now I have to decide if my negative impression is strong enough to make me skip it, in spite of my fondness for Leigh. I only got as far as her arrival in Rome, where her situation is put into context by a narrator who sounds as though he mainly narrates educational films and true-crime dramas. It is so jarring and flatfooted to express William's ideas with such an unmusical voice that it makes me suspicious of the movie as a whole. So my questions are: a) is there a lot of narration, or will this stop soon?) and b) is the bad narration and overwrought score representative of the overall approach to the film, or or they just a couple of blemishes in an otherwise worthwhile endeavor?

reply

The narration is only at the beginning for like a minute. It provides some background, then doesn't come up again. Don't let it hold you back from watching the movie!

reply

I agree. The narration was terrible. The narrator sounded like someone from an old movie newsreel. The narration gave the film an amateurish quality, which it thankfully lost as the film progressed. The narration was the only fly in the ointment in an otherwise wonderful film.

reply