MovieChat Forums > Jules et Jim (1962) Discussion > A Compelling, Spellbinding, and Intrigui...

A Compelling, Spellbinding, and Intriguing Film


I've read many perceptive comments made on the board here about the movie, which I just saw for the first time tonight, a recording of it I made off TCM when it aired a couple of months or so ago. I'd heard of "Jules et Jim" for many years, vaguely recalled that it was a Truffaut film, and supposedly a classic, but knew nothing of its plot or characters. I wanted to finally see it, though, primarily because of my interest in Jeanne Moreau, a contemporary of Brigitte Bardot and Chatherine Deneuve, both of whom I adore. I knew Oskar Werner only from "Ship of Fools" and "The Spy Who Came in From the Cold". Unlike some people, I've always enjoyed the challenge of reading subtitles, and this film really keeps one on its toes! To be honest, I had a hard time differentiating between who was Jim and who was Jules, but not to the point where it detracted from my viewing experience. It didn't really seem to matter too much. In short, I liked the film, which probably is a classic. It took me awhile to get into it, and get a sense of where it was headed, but after a certain point, I knew I was totally hooked(it probably was shortly after Ms. Moreau appeared). I found the photography captivating, eventually becoming quite enamored of the trio's carefree lifestyle and appealing residences, especially the chalet. Yes, Catherine may've been unlikeable in certain ways, but she obviously had an irresistable hold on Jules and Jim. The fellows may've been foolishly romantic and/or weak, but their bizarre and unconventional relationship with her seemed to work for all of them, at least in the early stages. The unusualness of it was what I found so intriguing and mesmerizing. I thought the WWI scenes were especially good. I honestly couldn't tell whether we were seeing actual war footage, or if they'd been recreated by Truffaut. The post-war conversation scene in the grassy field between Jules, Jim, and Albert was especially moving and memorable, I thought. The movie's ending totally shocked me. I have to admit that I found Catherine's act of suicide and murder, when she drove her car over the bridge with her estranged former lover, to be despicable, leading to a very depressing ending, but because I wasn't expecting something so dramatic and extreme, I didn't feel unfulfilled or let down. It was a capstone to a very mesmerizing movie over all!

reply

Just fiished watching it for the first time this afternoon and agree with your everything in your review (which I enjoyed reading). I guessed the WWI scenes were actual footage due to "old" look to the footage - the somewhat choppy/jumpy way the soldiers moved and how it looked accelerated a bit like film from early in the century. Truffaut may have put those affects in but my guess is this was real war footage. I had the same reaction to the ending, somewhat disappointed. It seemed an easy and unsatisfying way to get a quick and large emotional response out of viewers who had watched these characters slowly develop throughout the film. I like how Eric Rohmer, Godard and other French New age directors often just let the film end on a lower note then let you sit back and grasp what you have seen. I can see reasons for ending it this way, like maybe Catherine's "love life and live in the moment" personality had finally gotten bored with everything and performed an act similar to when she jumped in the river... or somehow she needed to "get even" with Jim, a trait in her personality mentioned more than once in the film, and here she did so by taking his life in exchange for not giving her the the child she wanted. It made it intriguing to be sure, but I would have rather had them all live. Regardless, it was a special film that I found very impressive and enjoyable to watch!

reply