MovieChat Forums > Jules et Jim (1962) Discussion > What about the BUG?????

What about the BUG?????


In the scene where Jim and catherine first kissed, a small thingy in the backround moves so awkward that it seems as if it's crawling inside catherine's mouth. Everyone who watches 'Le fabuleux destin d'Amelie Poulain' knows it's mentioned in that movie too. (Furthermore i think Jeunet is inspired by Jules et Jim to make Amelie. Very fast narrating in both movies is a very good proof) Now i wonder if there's a little possibility that Truffaut arranged that scene purposely. THAT'S INSANE IF HE COULD DO THAT BACK THEN!!!

reply

I noticed that too! But if you watch the trailer on the DVD, the same scene is shown but the bug is not there. Very strange.

reply

i also noticed the bug didn't appear in the trailer. which makes it even more mysterious.

sure i wondered if truffaut might have put it in on purpose. if it's accidental the direction and timing of the bug is amazing. it's also quite easy to come up with symbolic meanings. but i doubt that truffaut liked that sort of symbolism AND would go through the trouble of getting a bug in there for that purpose. (although i don't believe it is very hard to establish).

but now it is not in the trailer i wonder if it even appeared in the original prints. could it have gotten into later (video)editions with the bug disturbing a projection used to transfer the movie?

or is it digitally removed from the trailer (along with dust etcetera) but not from the movie? i imagine someone might have missed it after it was removed and it was put back in.

i wonder if this bit of trivial mysterie will ever be cleared. maybe it's more charming and magical not to know.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

It may be that the trailer uses a different take of the same scene. I've seen that done quite often, including with other Truffaut trailers, eg Baisers Voles.

- - - - - - - -
www.burnsandjohnson.blogspot.com
www.dictionaryofhammer.com

reply

Whether or not it was an accident, it has a thematic link with Jules's interest in insects and reptiles.

reply

It's so awesome how other people noticed that. :p

reply

I couldn't take my eyes off the bug for that entire scene! Glad I'm not the only one to notice it.

reply

AHHAHA ya, I was watching the bug the entire time trying to think of its symbolism. I thought somehow maybe it related to Jim because hes into bugs.

reply

Jules, not Jim.

reply

I just watched Jules et Jim and I noticed the bug too. I think it has some significance in the context of Jules' interest for insects. My brain is too fried right now to think further but I would link it with the fascination Jules has for insects. He talks about the love story he could write with insect characters? Perhaps that's Jules witnessing it, symbolizes his agreement to Jim and Catherine? Just thinking out loud here.

The film was brilliant, engrossing and thought-provoking at the same time.

reply

YES! I also noticed!! I just watched this movie again last night.
Prior to Jules mentions his swamp escapades and insect studies. I took it as a bit of a metaphor. A fly on the wall kind of thing.
But Jules also mentions if he ever wrote a love story, his characters would be insects. Maybe the bug was a metaphor for that, hinting that Jules would go on to write their love story. Or something...

reply

The beetle seen in the movie, was in fact there by complete chance. When Truffaut decided to leave it in the film, I will do my research and get back to you on exactly what reason he gave for leaving the film as it is. The main thing is that the bug was there at that moment purely by chance!

reply

I love it!

reply

THAT'S INSANE IF HE COULD DO THAT BACK THEN!!!

Why? Doesn't seem like it'd be any harder to do then than it would be now.

And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.

reply

I was distracted by the bug during that whole scene. Good to know I'm not the only one. !



http://oi53.tinypic.com/s3pmww.jpg
The Bromance Lives On!

reply

Wow, others noticed it too!

I love that scene -- I am sure there is some reason Truffaut chose to use that take -- maybe due to the irony of Jules' interest in bugs, maybe because Truffaut knew folks wold be talking about it 50 (!!) years later...

reply

[deleted]

"Le fabuleux destin d’Amélie Poulain" was schmaltz IMO... I wouldn't bring it into Jules and Jim board.

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

[deleted]

///Idiotic comment and attitude.///

sorry for hurting your feelings, but I typed IMO, that means: In My Opinion.

And what about some manners? You're too sensitive, it makes you rude.

Listen to your enemy, for God is talking

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]