How to analyse
How would you analyse this film in an examination? Due to the randomness of the narrative, its difficult to pinpoint particular elements in which to anaylse. Does anyone have any advice?
shareHow would you analyse this film in an examination? Due to the randomness of the narrative, its difficult to pinpoint particular elements in which to anaylse. Does anyone have any advice?
sharehmm in a way i don't think its random at all - every random event in the film has significance, whether it be the lies that catherine burns or the story about the man who meets the woman on the train n writes to her til his death. i think every frame has been thought out so that although it may seem random it really isn't.
shareThe best thing to do (I can only assume you are analysing it for french a-level?) - i think is to learn the characters, how they change through the film, how the relationships change, and how the film is made (eg lighting, sound etc) in order to reflect the changes throughout the film
shareI don't agree that the narrative was random though many of the characters' actions were certainly impulsive; in fact I found the narrative fairly tight (watch some late Godard films if you want random). As a teacher within the arts I would advise you to read the exam question thoroughly and really try to write to what you're being asked, i.e. from what perspective you are being asked to analyse the film, e.g. as a well crafted film, as a social statement, from a feminist perspective. This would inform your language choices and type of argument you're likely to employ. Read some published critiques of the film but trust your own judgement as well.
shareI can analyze it a bit, until the ending.
SPOILERS SPOILERS
Why did Catherine tried to shoot Jim and why did she take her own life and Jim's his life?
[deleted]
I think Jim felt guilty because he was always jelous of the years Jules had with Cathrine but felt Jules was never jelous of him and his relationship with Cathrine. She wanted to kill Jim when she knew she could never go back to him for support, as Jules always said, Cathrine always comes back from an affair. But when there was no one to come back too, this meant there was no life to be returned to when she was unsatisfied with life itself. By killing Jim, she was satisfied because she would be the controller of his suffering and he would lose the liberation he began to develop when he freed himself from Cathrine. Jim and Jules have always admired her liberation more than anything, as Jules said, they loved her because of this and it made her a "real woman." The impulsiveness and egocentric way of living drove Cathrine to her death and her suicide was the last act of power over herself and Jim.
share[deleted]
[deleted]