Isn't it funny, how the 'sexual liberation' only freed 50% of the people, and by doing that, drove the budding 'civilization' right into the ground?
Now both sexes are confused and women having so much power, have made a complete pig's breakfast of the whole 'seduction-pairing-relationship'-stuff, they don't even know what they want. First they follow their 'tingles' through all the alpha carousel, and when it turns out that men that have OPTIONS don't really settle for any individual woman, but actually USE those options, women want to change those men.
Then women say they want kind, compassionate, nerdy, intelligent, caring men who text them back and call them and take care of them and blahblah. The women don't MEAN regular men, though. The women don't want the men who ALREADY ARE all those things ( = simps).
This has confused men throughout the ages, how women can say they want a kind and caring man, and then TELL a kind and caring man that SOME OTHER woman will find a treasure in them, and that 'we should just be friends'. It couldn't be more confusing, until you realize women say things that are not rooted in reality, to keep up their image as a 'non-slut', while desiring to ACT as a slut.
Women don't want kind and nice men, they want to TURN thugs, alphas, CEOs, celebrities, outlaw bikers and prisoners INTO 'nice men'. If they ever succeed, they will leave those nice men and start over again with new thugs and so on.
So, there was a time, when this stuff was controlled, and 'Miss' and 'Mrs.' served an informational function in the human world, where everyone could easily know the important things about people. A woman's marital status was as important to know as a man's job. Has anyone noticed this is STILL the first question a woman asks a man, but men are NOT ALLOWED to ask about a woman's body count anymore?
So the whole 'Ms.'-stuff is hypocrite at best, fema-fascist information destruction at worst. Suddenly it's all veiled and shrouded.
reply
share
avortac4 (3752)
2 years ago
I mean, 'Mr./Dr.' vs. 'Miss/Mrs.' WAS a fair system, because both genders got information about both genders, about things that were IMPORTANT for relationships, marriage, pairing and raising a family.
Fema-fascists violently shoved a useless, extra thing in there, that destroyed the whole thing.
Men never needed the marital status-revealing equivalent of 'Miss/Mrs.', because man's marital status is IRRELEVANT and always was.
It's hard to believe in today's world, but some of these things were actually logical.
There's no logic in "Ms.", it just hides the information that made everything work back in the day.
I mean, from a human perspective, I can understand wanting to control what others know about you, and not wanting to reveal your marital status or lack thereof. But to have to INVENT a whole new category just to do that is just pretentious and hypocrite. "Is it Miss?" is a question any woman should've been able to answer "I'd rather not tell" or whatever.
That's the problem with honorifics anyway - at least japanese have always used 'san', so there's a gender-neutral honorific to use (so why couldn't women start using 'Mr.' instead, why did a new one have to be invented? Because women always have to be 'special' and pedestalized to the max.?).
However, even they often destroy this convenience for the sake of gender-obsession, so we often hear 'chan' and 'kun' and whatnot. It's a bit sickening to me, as I only consider gender a trivial thing in the grand scheme of things. Useful for pairing, mating, sexual stuff, etc., but beyond that, we should be able to be more genderless and more focused on humanity instead of 'genderity'. No one should identify fully with a temporary quality like a gender, and everyone should realize we're human beings, first.
reply
share
avortac4 (3752)
2 years ago
In any case, I don't think the OP is really talking as much against the stupidly artificial and illogical, pretentious "Ms.", but the INACCURACY of the subtitles, putting words and agendas into people's and character's mouths, not being able to just translate something without EDITORIALIZING it for 'modern, politically-correct climate'.
It's like taking something someone says in an old show and changing it completely, altering its meaning just so it will FIT the insanity that's called political correctness.
That _IS_ something to complain about, and the OP's point is valid. It seems like a tiny change, but I have noticed this kind of crap done a lot, too, and it pisses me off. Why can't AT LEAST the old shows be what they actually are? Do we have to alter and change everything, so we can never know what was ACTUALLY done and created in history?
Should Laura be digitally altered to be a man, or Dick a woman? Should Dick van Dyke's name be changed, because the word in that name are offensive nowadays?
I mean, when you go down this road, where will it end? We will just stare at a black dot at a black screen, and then be horrified, because it's racist to do that. I mean, there's no entertainment, if we continue down this path. Someone has to point out and stop this madness, and I am glad the original poster had the courage to do so.
Being deaf must be annoying and impractical in ways that 'hearing people' don't even think about, but I must say there has to be at least one good thing about it; noisy neighbours can never wake you up or bother you with their explosive insanity and heelstomping all night long. You don't have to buy earplugs, like I do.. and those earplugs DO let the most annoying sounds through that dig into your mind and start attacking your peace of mind until there are only tiny shreds left.
Just out of curiosity, can you still hear something? I mean, 'seriously deaf' sounds less deaf than 'fully deaf', but I might be misinterpreting things.
reply
share