so the first man.........
in the world is a caucasian(adam), and the last man in the world is a negro??
shareUmmmm....where the heck did you get the idea that the first man on earth (Adam) was a Caucasian? Oh, probably from the children's bible you had 50 years ago that showed Adam and Eve - and their many-great-grandson named Jesus, too - as blonde, blue-eyed, and white.
Well, none of them were. The Garden of Eden was in AFrica. All humankind started with type O blood, in Africa.
I don't know where you're from, but 'roun these heah parts, we don't say "negro" any more, because it's too much like a much uglier word that also begins with "n".
And in case you're wondering, I'm Caucasian.
cagordon22 - I agree that mankind in all likelyhood first emerged from Africa. I'm not a religious individual, but whether Jesus was the son of God or just another man, I think it's very possible that he was neither white nor black. Seems to me he'd probably have had Mediterranean features - like someone from Iraq or Iran for instance.
I've never been a fan of the "n" word either... it really sickens me to hear it used. And by the way, I'm an old white dude myself. :)
Mediterranean is not a human race..
and iranians are different from iraqis.however they are both caucasian mainly
actually iranians are not even of mediterranean subrace. they were of alpine subrace, but now they are mixed with mongoloids, turks and dark arabians (who were mediterranean mixed with a few negroids)..
that means ,iranians used to be whiter than spaniards.. of course,today spanish people are mixed with celtic and other europeans.
so today in order of whiteness. spanish>iranian=iraqi .sometime ancient:iranian>spanish=iraqi
you were fooled by the leftist lies that even a negroid knew those were lies..
get some study before you are intolerant of people in the name of tolerance.
"you were fooled by the leftist lies that even a negroid knew those were lies..."
"get some study before you are intolerant of people in the name of tolerance."
...............................................................................
Hmmm... I probably shouldn't bother responding to your blather (that's a verb that means to talk foolishly at length), but here goes anyway.
It's quite obvious from the content of your posts - on this board and others - that you seem to have a preoccupation with race, as well as a need to dictate your own brand of morality to others. Furthermore, your spelling and punctuation are atrocious and your thoughts seem somewhat disjointed. Consequently, it's very difficult for me to take your inane (i.e. empty, insubstantial, shallow, silly) remarks seriously.
As far as your suggestion that I "get some study" - I am a college graduate, a former serviceman, and a retired law enforcement officer, who by the way, has also read 'your' bible. Might 'I' suggest to you... finish high school, go on to get at least some formal education (there are many 'good' books...not just the one), and lastly, get out of your basement and experience life a little. You may want to actually go out and talk with some of those negroes (Do your knuckles drag when you walk?) you seem so absorbed with. It might just do you some good.
Lastly... it is possible that you have suffered some massive head trauma in the past that I'm not aware of. That 'would' explain a lot. If this is the case, then know one thing - your rehabilition is not complete and you need to seek further treatment immediately.
Have a nice day.
"he was neither white nor black but Mediterranean "
well, have you said anything about the issue in your message? no. do you still believe Mediterranean is a race? if so do you have anything to back it up.?
my words are partially quoted from some anthropologists articles, they are liberal but not extremist leftists.... I can't 100% trust them , so if you have anything academic to say, I welcome..
that idea that marcchanois accepts bible mythology as fact is proof enough for me that he's an idiot...so let's just move on, shall we?
share