let me start of by saying I love TZ I bought the box set last year and fell in love straight away. however there has been one episode that everyone else seem to love that I cant enjoy.
walking distance I tried oh god did I try to get into this but it's just not going to happen. first I don't care about martin he's a sook "oh I have a high paying job in new York my life stinks" boo frigging who, then we are meant to feel bad for him because his mum and dad don't recognise him of course they have no idea who he is. he's a middle aged man who walked back into the past THEY HAVE NEVER MET YOU!! and then the idiot cripples himself on the merry go round and for what so at the end of the episode he could learn not to grow up to fast to hold on to the good times. look I'm sorry but all the praise it's gets it's beyond me this episode taught us something we already knew ENJOY LIFE well thanks for that but walking distance is not a good example IMO
As I posted on another topic I really enjoy Walking Distance. Maybe it's one of those episodes that you don't fully appreciate until you get older, maybe with a family, etc. When you are younger (20s or younger) one doesn't look back much b\c your life is ahead of you. However, as you get older (especially with grown kids, grandchildren) you find yourself reflecting on your life more. Part of aging and growing wiser (I hope!). To the OP, watch it again in 20 years and see if you feel differently about it.
But is it really wise to look back at your life in regret and feeling that what you have got in the here and now is not worth anything? The father tells Martin to appreciate what he has in the present (his actual adult present) and not waste his time crying over a lost childhood and an idealized past that is gone and where "there is no room" for grown Martin anyway.
I think this goes deeper. Why is Martin miserable, why didn't he start a family of his own and built a life he can enjoy? Instead, he dwells on a kind of Peter Pan complex and wants to be a child in the summer holidays for the rest of his life. He has to understand that the past is gone and that this is the way life is and it is harmful to want to change it. So his trip to the past is some kind of psychotherapy that will hopefully teach him not to waste his life with dreams of the past any more. I think that is the point of the episode.
One more detail that I picked up was a situation with his father, when they talk about what lies ahead of him, the 11 year old Martin, and the aged Martin gives the father a certain look. I don't know whether it was intended, but I thought he thought of two world wars that lie between his now and the father's then, and not only has Martin lost his innocence, but the whole world because of that. So on a broader level, the episode is also about a feeling that time cannot be turned back and history has happened and we all (the postmodern humans) have lost our innocence for good. We cannot go back but we have to see how we can live on and make the best of it,
The episodes I always pick as my least favortie that everyone seems to love are "That Midnight Sun" & "Perchance to Dream". I just don't see anything good about them.
(except, of course, for the teen/ young adult fans, who simply don't get this incredible half-hour).
I have been watching the Twilight Zone since I was 4. And loved this episode as a kid. I am now well over 30. I think you are assuming things. There are many adults who don't get things.
reply share
Young adults won't get that episode? I watched it for the first time. I have only watched 6 episodes of The Twilight Zone chronologically and episode 5 Walking Distance was without a doubt one of my favorites. The weakest one so far was episode 3 Mr. Denton on Doomsday.
EDIT: Forgot to mention age. I'm 20. So your theory stinks.
I really liked Walking Distance, but there are a couple of TZs that I refuse to watch because I just find them dull. The Invaders and The Masks come to mind, but I do love most of them. Dini
Myself I don't care for but just 2 episodes: "Escape Clause" & "The Fever" - mainly on account of David Wayne & Everett Sloane respectively. Those are the only two episodes I've seen yet that totally fail in my book. 
"It's a Good Life" is overrated to me, but I don't think it's a bad ep; just overrated. My main problem is the unintentional laughs, cheap special effects and over-the-top acting. And WHO bought people a record album without a sleeve??? I think the wife truly hated Perry Como, so she deliberately wrapped the album in harsh gift wrap in the hopes the record would be too scratched to play! Little Billy Mumy is a marvel, though.
Why would Mr. Death be interested in bargains from a street hustler? Because Mr. Death is no dummy, and he knew that letting Bookman entice him with a great pitch means that he gets to take Bookman, which is what he wanted all along.
I hated "It's a Good Life", but maybe it is just because it was so disturbing to me at the time it had a negative effect on me. Or maybe it's because I saw The Simpsons version first which I also did not like much and it carried over. I also think 20,000 Feet is over-rated, but not bad, it should just not be the flagship episode many consider it to be (I saw the Simpson's version of that too, but that one I enjoyed).
Yes, it's easy to predict the ending to "Eye", but I don't think Serling or the director themselves thought for a moment people WOULDN'T predict it! Not every TZ has to surprise you with its ending - the series was so much more than that (if it was just about the "twist ending", the series wouldn't be watched over and over for 55 years now).
"Eye" dazzles with its atmosphere, lighting, and the suspense of the bandages being removed. And the makeup STILL freaks me out. In fact, the makeup looks utterly fake in the pointless '02 remake. Black-and-white photography and lighting serve this story so much better.
As for "Nightmare", it is also eons better than its remake in the awful TZ film.
Great, you disagree. What do I care? You seem to be judging people's choices when the point of this is to list episodes each of us dislikes that are otherwise well liked and regarded.
Agree on Time Enough At Last. It just doesn't do it for me. The first time when it was fresh was okay for me, but it didn't hold the magic and I just skip it in later rewatching of the series.
Really, any Burgess Meredith episode is like this for me, although I don't hate the actor. To me, he just hams it up in his TZ performances.
Agree with you on Eye of the Beholder. The only time I enjoyed it was when I was a little kid and didn't know any better. It was way too drawn out. I like Nightmare at 20,000 Feet though which was the first TZ I remember seeing. It has remained a favorite for me because Shatner's acting is so good in that one.
Two episodes that I heard a lot of great things about are "The Invaders" and "The Jungle", and I have to say I didn't care for either one. The Invaders was very slow and boring with a predictable ending. The Jungle was pretty much the same. I know it doesn't always have to have a "twist" but when an episode is TOO predictable, it's just not entertaining to me.
I, too, liked Walking Distance.. I'm also in my early 50's. Some may be more sentimental to their childhood years. Some are more easily able to move on and never look back. Neither is wrong. To us Sentimentalists it rings loudly. I wish I did not long for the past as much as I do. That's why it's special to me. It was a very special carefree time.
The Invaders, as much as I love Agnes Moorehead, was just plain boring. What was a half hour episode seemed more like an hour.
That being said, their aren't too many TZ's I don't like. But there are more than a few.
We all have our own tastes, likes and dislikes. Why is it so hard to be respectful of that? Not everybody had to agree with us.
I love hearing differing opinions as it makes me see things in a different life. You learn from differences.
Maybe some people take it as an affront if some don't deem special the Episodes they like. Such a shame.
I love hearing everyone's opinion and why. I don't like Ad Hominem attacks.
Looking forward to hearing more people's opinions.
I think that's very well put. I am decidely *not* a sentimentalist. I had a nice childhood, but nothing incredible. I would not cite my childhood as the best part of my life. Indeed, if I *had* to pick a best part, it would probably be my college years. So for me Walking Distance does *not* ring loudly. But your post makes me better appreciate how it does for some.
I think this is a good subject for discussion. One that everyone seems to like, but that I don't care too much for is the one about the mannequins. I don't dislike it, but it's not one that I look forward to seeing as much as some others.
I've always been amazed at how popular "It's a Good Life" is. To me, the entire episode is:
"That's good, Anthony, real good." "Somebody stop him." "You're a bad man. A very bad man." Repeat endlessly for 1/2 hour. Roll credits.
Then again, I liked "I Shot an Arrow", which most people seem to despise. And I have to admit, the ending is improbable in the extreme. So there's no accounting for (my) taste.
Psycho came out two years before I was born. I've heard about it all my life, but never saw it on TV. I saw Psycho 2 at the drive-in but it didn't seem that good.
I agree with you on both counts: I think "Good Life" is overrated, and "I Shot An Arrow" is a good one. The problem with "It's A Good Life" is that it's a pure premise episode. There' s no actual plot. The premise is a good one, to be sure, but there's no story at all. It has been said many times that if you want to know what a story is about, look at what's different between the beginning and the end. In the case of "Good Life", the answer is: *nothing*.
Nor is there supposed to be. That one's not about a story to be told, it's an exercise in showing the suffering of unrelenting terror. A story has a resolution; that episode works specifically because it has no resolution. That aberration in the framework makes it more disturbing, because we expect there to be an ending.
But there's not. Those people are going to continue to live in utter fear. And for 20 minutes, we get to experience that, with no sense of closure, just as they have no closure.
----- WORDS MEAN THINGS! Also, before you come to bitch about a plot hole, rewatch the show/movie.
reply share
Interesting perspective. But to me, it's like chicken feet.
Ever had the chicken feet at a dim sum meal? I have, and I don't care for it. And those who like it tell me, "well, it's not really about the taste, it's about the texture." Well, that may be. But I don't *like* the texture.
Same here. It certainly is disturbing to me that it doesn't have an ending. But it's not disturbing in a good way. I find it a disturbing that leaves me feeling very unsatisfied.
And in thinking about it, my problem isn't just that it doesn't have an ending. It doesn't have a beginning either. The "story" starts with the situation already established, and ends with the identical situation. *nothing* happens. There is no story at all.
Contrast this with "The Odyssey of Flight 33". This one too lacks an ending. There is no resolution. But it doesn't bother me so much, because it at least *is* a story. There's a beginning, and a middle, and events happen and we start to understand better what's going on... stuff happens! The fact that the ending is left unresolved kind of works, because it leaves you to imagine for yourself what the resolution ends up being. And at least you know there's *going* to be a resolution. I don't *love* the non-ending, but I can live with it. The episode is at least very clearly a story. "It's A Good Life" is just static. Not my cup of tea.
Well, it could be said that at the end, the townspeople were even *more* afraid of Anthony, because he had consigned one of their friends to the "cornfield," (which I always think of as a state of limbo). Also, by making it snow unseasonably, on a mere whim, he was causing them to lose half their crops. We don't know if he has ever done that before---probably not, judging by his father's reaction. And it's pretty serious in their circumstances. (You know *Anthony* won't be going hungry!)
Technically, "It's a Good Life" is really just a "Monster of the Week" episode, even though Rod Serling consistently defended his show against critique by saying, "It's not a Monster of the Week show - it's more cerebral."
I'm glad you expressed your opinion. May I ask why you did not like it?
I think I liked it because as a young child back in the 60's, being able to run around freely without parental supervision like today, my friends and I would pretend the mannequins would "come to life" and we'd run around the store, hiding in clothing racks.
Yes, that's what children did before there was Cable, Video games, I-phones this and I pads that.
To me, it was just kind of dull after the first viewing. It's fine the first time around, but after that, there's nothing really interesting or surprising about it (to me). I still watch it, but I prefer other episodes.
I agree.... I guess I just like it because of the creepiness of Mannequins and the Creepiness of the doll collection I had at a young age at the time. Thanks for your answer.
I hate "I Sing the Body Electric," but I'm not sure very many people really like that one. When I've posted on it in the past, most people said they disliked it.
I just find the basic premise of it far-fetched. Or maybe a better way to put my objection is that it doesn't say anything interesting about human life. Most TZ episodes have interesting morals. I don't think that one does.
"Extremism in the pursuit of moderation is no vice."
The two main ones that come to mind are The Hitchhiker and Night Call. I just did not find the guy who played the Hitchhiker scary at all. And the old man's voice in Night Call... I dunno, it just sounded like...well..somebody really stupid rather than somebody dead. I don't like the Invaders either, but it seems that one's not as highly regarded as I had thought.