The knight and the family are both in the same town when the flagellants arrive. Then the "tavern torture" scene occurs. Then the knight has strawberries with the family, so it appears he's joined their party by this time.
So did he join the group "off screen" "during" the tavern scene? Otherwise, why is he sitting playing chess so close, if he's not already a member of the party? Am I right that he wasn't purposefully following them before the flagellant scene?
I thought I missed a scene where he's invited to join the family, but there's no such scene. He's not with the group at the flagellants scene; he in with the group after [the intervening tavern scene].
Jof and Maria join Antonius Block after Jöns, the squire, saves Jof at the tavern. Block then warns them that the Plague is stronger in southern Sweden, and suggests they come with him. As a knight, he can offer them refuge.
Because they saw Antonius with Death and wanted no part of that, getting away while no one else noticed.
What I don't understand is why Antonius saves them (by distracting Death with the game and by jostling the board) and not the others, whom he leads to their eventual doom.
I have long interpreted Antonius upsetting the chessboard as an expression of frustration, recognizing his supposed cleverness in suggesting the game in the first place is not going to succeed. Yes, by success I mean two things, one being the existential anxiety that would presumably be addressed if he knew more about God and God's nature, but also the possibility he would actually win. He knows by the time he upsets the board it is merely a matter of time before he loses.
As such I don't know that it was intended to benefit Mary and Jos, although it had that effect.
The business about the others being led to their dooms by following him is one of the most challenging aspects of the film, imo. I am not sure of the answer, either. It has the effect, particularly if one remembers seeing it the first time, of being profoundly unsettling. Perhaps that is the answer. Those following had reason to believe that as a sort of authority figure who also had the persona of competence, their chances of survival might be better with him, and thus they followed him. They did not know is time was fast diminishing, but I don't think he had any specific reason to fear for their safety. I don't think Death implied he would take anyone in Antonius's company when his time finally came.
But Death did take them. Perhaps on a literal level someone in the group carried the Plague with them, and the irony of escaping from the Plague was that they died nonetheless. But I do think it was more the bit about him being an authority figure that made it unsettling. The fact is no one here gets out alive, no matter how much or little in human terms some among us seem better equipped for avoiding it.
<<As such I don't know that it was intended to benefit Mary and Jos, although it had that effect.>>
The reason I thought it might have been intentional is after they leave, there is a shot where Antonius seems to register their departure, while Death is chiding him for his folly in knocking the chessboard being that Death has the board memorized. My memory of the exchange is that Death tells him it was a useless gesture, and Antonius replies that he doesn't agree. The expression on his face seems to suggest he is thinking of Mary and Jos.
<<Perhaps on a literal level someone in the group carried the Plague with them, and the irony of escaping from the Plague was that they died nonetheless.>>
For the metaphor of Death taking everyone to work on a literal level, you kind of need a reason for it to happen on a practical level, not just that Death is in the house and doing a group rate. For a while, I thought it might have been triggered the bracelet we see Jos take from the ex-cleric in the bar. We saw the scene in the barn where the ex-cleric is first revealed to be stealing the bracelet from a dead woman, a plague victim I seem to remember, then we see Jos take the bracelet and give it to Mary. Later, the bracelet gets passed around by members of the party. Since the ex-cleric is later seen dying of the plague himself, it suggests something he had on him might have similarly been infected.
But for that to work, the main carriers of the plague in Antonius's party would have been the ones holding onto it longest, Jos and Mary. And they and their infant son are the only escapees, while the others are killed wholesale. How did the plague miss both Mary and Jos, whether it was the bracelet (which I now sort of doubt) or not? The ending feels too sweeping, like Bergman wanted to make a big statement and was no longer observing the physical reality of the situation.
"Monty Python's The Meaning Of Life" seems to refer to this question when Death pays a visit to a similar group of people dining in an isolated house. They question him on how come they are all going to die at the same time.
Death tells them it's because they ate a tainted dish, the salmon mousse. They seem satisfied about this, obediently die, and assume spirit form. As they leave frame, one of the women (Michael Palin) pauses and says: "Hey, I didn't even eat the mousse."
Well, perhaps my memory is really failing me here (I guess it has been near 2 years since I saw this film), but I don't recall it ever being said why even Antonius must die. My recollection is Death says nothing more than that it is his time. After journeying to the Holy Lands, presumably much fighting and dying there, the risks of the journey, and the Plague being about. We don't understand how any of those things directly caused him to die, or more accurately were identified as the practical cause of his death.
I never thought of hte bracelet as having that sort of significance, but you in any event are not comfortable with that angle yourself.
So I do kind of fall back to the irony of the others following Antonius with the illusion he will make them safe, and how their false understanding leads to their death. Not that it caused it - Death comes at no appointed time for nearly all of us. That is part of its nature.
We tend to at least to some level try and comfort ourselves that the timing of death has a moral component. Virtuous people, who follow good practices in health, behaviors, risk avoidance and the like, do in general tend to live longer. But even the most virtuous in such regard can be cut down by an unforseen accident. The fact is Death needs no moral basis upon which to time when he acts or put off our final day.
Having said that one can perhaps criticize the film for not providing any practical explanation for why all in attendance joined Antonius. But I am sure Bergman knew he did not present any such explanation. And yet he ended the film as he did. I think that tells us something, no doubt.
Block definitely upends the board to save the actors and the child. If any carried the plague in the party it would most likely be the mute woman, considering her whole village died including the ex-cleric.