Come to think of it, war itself is usually "long, boring, and depressing."
The simple point of "Mr. Roberts" -- book, play, movie -- is that war is either sheer hell or sheer boredom -- "from Tedium to Apathy and back again, with an occasional side trip to Monotany," as author Thomas Heggen put it. "Mr. Roberts" accounts for the millions of American servicemen who endured boredom far from World War II's front lines and who, now and then, wondered how they might fare and behave in the combat jobs that most expected and/or feared.
"Mr. Roberts" also addresses the tyranny of military hierarchy, the utter helplessness that the crew feels under the rule of a selfish, stupid commanding officer. Perhaps captains like Morton were rarities (I sure hope so) but I've had bosses who resembled him (one in particular). At least I could leave my job -- but the men of the USS Reluctant couldn't get away short of desertion, family hardship, or (in Roberts' case), something close to blackmail.
In the end, Roberts goes to find his manhood in combat aboard another ship. Pulver, inspired by his mentor, ultimately finds his manhood as well aboard the Reluctant. The film ends both tragically and triumphantly, which is one reason it resonates so well. It just feels right.
"Mr. Roberts" is indeed a war movie, but not a combat movie. There's a difference. I don't think the film is quite as good as Heggen's book -- there's a lot of Fordian slapstick, which for some is an acquired taste -- but by turns the film produces both belly laughs and moist eyes, and life is like that sometimes.
reply
share