them/1954
What ever happened to the little girl who was lost in the desert? Did the ants get her? or was she picked up by the police. Did the president know about the ants? why did they wait so long to call the army to help?
shareWhat ever happened to the little girl who was lost in the desert? Did the ants get her? or was she picked up by the police. Did the president know about the ants? why did they wait so long to call the army to help?
shareWHO WAS THE ACTOR WHO WAS ATTACKED BY THE ANTS THAT DID NOT LIVE?
shareThe actor is James Whitmore. I think his character name was Ben Peterson. Everytime I watch this movie, I have an urge him to yell at him to shoot the ant coming at him BEFORE he puts the little boy into the elevated storm drain.
shareThe little girl wound up in a mental hospital, Central; that's where she was snapped out of her shock by Dr. Harold Medford passing a cup of formic acid under her nose. She snapped out of it, and began screaming, "Them! Them!" and crying.
As for why Sgt. Peterson didn't simply grab the flame-thrower gun and incinerate the ant before it reached him, well, you need to know a little bit about flame-throwers, Lumpy. To use one correctly, it has to be on your back, and you have to lean forward and brace yourself against the recoil and heat of the flame-jet; if you don't, you might be knocked off-balance and incinerated by your own flame-jet coming back at you. The character Peterson may have been a Marine in WWII or Korea and checked out thoroughly on flame-throwers (actor James Whitmore was, in fact, a WWII Marine veteran, and was trained on flame-throwers), so he knew the danger of possibly being burned alive; that's why he helped the boy into the storm drain and then tried to get up there himself. He removed the flame-thrower because it was so heavy; with the weapon strapped to his back, he would not have been able to heft himself up into the storm drain. But of course, he under-estimated the speed with which the ant could move ... with the results as depicted on film.
Interesting technical post. -- Thank you
shareYeah. Didn't realize that he couldn't just have picked up the "gun" part of the flamethrower and shot. That does make that aspect of the movie more believable, and provides a real reason instead of a pointless heroic suicide.
As a side note, I do think it would be cool to have a small gas-cartridge operated flamethrower like appeared in the video game Resident Evil 2. Much more convienient than the big bulky WWII ones.
[deleted]
What happened to the idiot asking questions about a movie he didnt pay attention too and now needs coddling to be given cliff notes on the film. MORON.