Most films of the era that found kids in prominent roles resulted in those kids being quite irksome -- it's the time, place and style of film-making, although Suddenly was contradictory in terms of what was shown on screen in regards to many pictures of the mid-fifties i.e. the John Baron character was hugely despicable with ZERO redeeming qualities. Compare him to, say, Duke Mantee from The Petrified Forest. Mantee was more accomodating than Baron, whose only charitable act was to pull Stirling Hayden's character's broken arm into place, and probably just because it would hurt like hell.
The kid, the mother, grandfather, even the cop, are/were all idealised versions of who they were -- whiter-than-white and all-American, so to speak. Baron was stark in contrast, and, even though the kid was a pesky one, maybe this was required or, in fact, the point. Maybe if the film was made by a more prolific studio, the above could have been ironed out, but would that have been at the expense of Baron being so vile? I don't know, but I do think this is a splendid film and Sinatra was marvellous -- I'd even go so far to say that it was almost on a par with The Petrified Forest and The Desperate Hours, the latter, benefitting hugely by its budget.
I would have liked to see Sinatra play an out-and-out villain again, especially as he developed as an actor and could hand-pick roles.
NOW TARZAN MAKE WAR!
reply
share