I have seen this movie many times over the years, and I find it delightful in many respects (as I do "Forever Darling); however, many of the scenes that are supposed to be funny just make me cringe. I wish there were more of Nikkie and Tacy enjoying themselves. It seems as though it is nothing but conflict, and most of it is excruciating to watch.
Love the small part where they are driving through Yosemite singing, but, other than that, it seems like they are either fighting or suffering through the problems of the trialer. The scene with Madge Blake ("Poor Grace" scene) is just miserable to watch.
How could Minnelli have let this movie be released as is? Does anybody else feel that the 'comedy' is unfunny?
I'm right with you shandy8. Sometimes an actor playing a stone cold moron is funny. This movie is not one of them. Lucille Ball's character Tacy could not possibly be more infantile and idiotic. Desi Arnez' character Nicky couldn't be more of a doormat and not in a cute way.
The couple had great chemistry, both do physical comedy wonderfully, Tacy's clothes were luscious and the scenery was to die for. But I couldn't get over how brainless the main characters were.
It seems Nicky the Doormat was very susceptible in one area. Check out the scene where Tacy is describing their honeymoon while she tousles his hair. Something like "Just you and me in the wilderness" blah-blah and the look on his face: dazed with lustful fantasies!
~~~~~~~ Please put some dashes above your sig line so I won't think it's part of your dumb post.
I agree with shandy8, this film can be excruciating to watch. I saw this movie on television as a kid and thought it was funny. Watching it now as a 30+ adult, much of the movie made me cringe. "Nicky" sure put up with a lot of "Tracy's" demands to try to make her (if at all possible) happy. I did enjoy seeing a slice of America in the 1950's, the cars, towns, fashions. The wedding gift monogramed luggage seen towards the end of the film is almost exactly the same set my parents had...they were married in 1952. Another aspect of the film I could totally relate to was Tracy's penchant for collecting rocks. In 1973 my family took a long, long camping trip in a motor home and MY MOTHER collected some good sized rocks along the way. My father became progressively annoyed just as Nicky did. I am sure dad considered disposing of the souvenir rocks in the same manner. To sum up the long, long, trailer.....as a mature adult, I cannot fathom a man loving a woman so much to endure all his sufferings. Some examples: The cash flowing out of his wallet like water, no place to put his clothes, her inability to drive the car & trailer, ad nauseam. And don't think a male chauvinist pig wrote this, a WOMAN is writing this!
I think the problem here is that there is no balance.
Tacy's demands come purely from her vision of marriage, and mostly seem selfish.
Besides which, there is all this talk of Nicky's career but we see very little real evidence of it.
And of course there are no real supporting players a la Mertzes to give a chance for either the guys or the gals to connive with each other in a battle of the sexes like on "Lucy".
I, for one, however, feel that this is a rare exception where the privilege of seeing this couple in color makes up for the shortcomings.
"Don't call me 'honey', mac." "Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"
Robert Osborn on TCM said this movie made more money than MGM's comedy-record setter "Father of the Bride".
I think alot of that had to do with the fact that not only were the Arnazes - in their "Ricardo" mode - presented in color, they were also larger than life.
I wish I could see this movie in a theater. All of us have only known them on the little screen. This movie is the one opportunity to see them 8 feet tall (projecting an episode of "I Love Lucy" on large TV screen is just not the same thing).
"Don't call me 'honey', mac." "Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"
I think MGM was banking on the success of the popular chemistry that Lucy and Desi had on the small sceen, and, to some extent (especially given the financial success of the movie), they were right; however, I would have loved to see a feature-length Technicolor "I Love Lucy" movie featuring the Mertzes. One the other hand, the Lucy-Desi hour long show (with the exception of the first one) were pretty lame.
I liked the 2nd LDCH "The Star Next Door" with Tallulah Bankhead - I'm surprised you didn't like it - but the reaction to the hour-long shows has always been mixed.
I guess I'm just one of those "Ricardo-Mertz" junkies: any episode with the four of them is "watchable".
Re "The Long, Long Trailer" - it's a real pity they didn't just turn it into a movie-length "I Love Lucy" episode - there was so much potential for Ethel and Fred to have their say - and indulge in appropriately "Mertz-y" antics - on a X-country tour with the Ricardos and a trailer.
"Don't call me 'honey', mac." "Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"
by shandy8 (Mon Jun 23 2008 15:57:38) Ignore this User | Report Abuse I have seen this movie many times over the years, and I find it delightful in many respects (as I do "Forever Darling); however, many of the scenes that are supposed to be funny just make me cringe. I wish there were more of Nikkie and Tacy enjoying themselves. It seems as though it is nothing but conflict, and most of it is excruciating to watch.
Love the small part where they are driving through Yosemite singing, but, other than that, it seems like they are either fighting or suffering through the problems of the trialer. The scene with Madge Blake ("Poor Grace" scene) is just miserable to watch.
How could Minnelli have let this movie be released as is? Does anybody else feel that the 'comedt' is unfunny?
"I love corn!"
Well, it's actually a "chick flick". That is the market is actually the newlywed woman or females with marriage on their minds. It's essentially a date film from 1953. The humor is in the woman getting her man to do things for her, and showing the struggles and lengths he's willing to go to please her.
reply share
I actually think that it's 'Tacy' who goes out of her way to please 'Nicky'... Both seem willing to compromise, but the humor seems to come out of the problems they deal with.
I love the Arnaz's and wish they had mane more pictures together (wouldn't it have been great to have Vivian Vance and Bill Frawley on the big screen?), but this movie always leaves me depressed.
"What do you want me to do, draw a picture? Spell it out!"
How funny should a movie about a troubled marriage be? It's definately not slapstick like I Love Lucy. I've always loved this movie since I saw it as a kid in the 60's. I probably even saw it the first time on a B&W TV. I guess there are a few funny parts like Ma Kettle and Floyd helping with Tacy's sprained foot, backing the trailer into the rose bushes, falling out the door into the mud, and off course trying to cook in a moving Trailer, but mostly I see it as a character study with a series of mishaps and turmoil. I also like it more as it ages, as a great nostalgia piece.
I love the scenes in the trailer park with Marjorie Main too (slipping her a sleeping pill on her wedding night! Haha). I love all the scenes while they are traveling through the cities and the countryside. The Technicolor is gorgeous.
"What do you want me to do, draw a picture? Spell it out!"
It would have made a great 30 minute sit-com episode. I felt like I was watching a variation of the same joke for 96 minutes. The TECHNICOLOR was beautiful though.