MovieChat Forums > Niagara Discussion > a truly mediocre movie, but with some in...

a truly mediocre movie, but with some interest (spoiler)


Where do we begin to show how mediocre this movie is? The dialogue is plodding and dull. No, wait, I can recall the wittiest line - "Her dress is cut so low it goes down to her knees." Not exactly a zinger. There is some terrible acting - the husband with his plastic smile ("Gosh, there it is! The Shredded Wheat factory!"), Don Wilson overacting as the company boss (stick to your day job, Don, as announcer for the Jack Benny Show), moments where Marilyn does her trademark mugging, Marilyn's much too long bit of singing, moments when even Joseph Cotton, with all his acting skills, can't make the lifeless dialogue convincing. The plot, for at least an hour, drags, and when it picks up it is mostly predictable - fleeing from her murderous husband, she climbs higher, higher, higher, my god, will she escape? - will anybody be rescued from the boat as it heads toward the falls? will the innocent lady perish? what will happen to the murderer? Come on, folks - Marilyn Monroe is caught making out right at a spot where tourists crowd around every minute, only barely hidden from plain view. Her boyfriend's whistling is badly overdubbed. Lots of the movie feels like a poor imitation of Hitchcock, from the use of the falls as a dramatic backdrop to the murder scene among the bells.

But it's an amusing bit of schlock from the early 50s. We see what was considered a hot piece of woman in those days. (Try not to giggle.) The virtuous wife definitely set my heart beating more than Marilyn with all her wiggly walking. And it's a great documentary showing what Niagara Falls looked like over 50 years ago. The best part of the movie might have been the police car.

reply

dschc535-Did you see this in original release? You do realize that this was made over five decades ago? I think that your comments are much too harsh.

This is a great film whether or not put into the context of the era in which it was produced, naturally things have changed, but I still find Marilyn to be enchanting.
She captivates me, especially during the phonograph scene, which is very provocative.

"Try not to giggle" at what? Perhaps this just isn't your type of movie.

reply

hattonmann, That phonograph scene is one of my favorites too. Loved the dress, and that line..."There is no other song."
I`d be curious to know the sort of films and actresses that dschc likes. The profile does`nt have anything to go by.

reply

I'm a gay guy and even I can appreciate her beauty! I think she looked very sexy in this movie. Her walk was a little bit too wiggly though.

reply

@NJgateway: re her walk, a lot of effort went into perfecting that walk. IT wasn't her choice, she was directed to go a little over the top. She ended up putting a pebble in her shoe as a tool to getting the walk right. It was definitely intended to be that way.

reply

We see what passed for a hot piece of woman in the 50's??? We also see what passed for a hot woman in the 60's, 70's 80's...well, you get the idea. I'm a young man myself and even I can appreciate Marilyn's timeless beauty!

reply



I for one really liked it, despite its many minor faults.
I watched it (this was a few years ago) without any expectations AT ALL - and with Joseph Cotten in the picture I could be comfortably confident that it, in any event, it couldn't be very bad. (I am not a die-hard Cotten's "fan", but I do think he was a very good - very credible - actor.)

As I said, this was a few years ago; I haven't seen it since. But the lingering overall impression, the "mood", is that it was a surprisingly effective "film noir" (in dazzling colour, but "noir" all the same).

I don't think it was ever intended to contain "zingers". (Also, I think that the expression referring to the decollete was then much more "novel" - therefore witty - than it is today, when we have all heard it so many times in different films and contexts.)

About the "making out" in a very conspicuous, public space where, as you said, people could be expected at any moment to come by: I've always had the impression that Rose perhaps WANTED it that way, either out of pure exhibitionism (which would be consistent with other traits of her personality) or because, maybe, she wanted to get caught. (After all, we're not talking about a "normal" person here.)

OH, and BTW: while I am not the most ardent "fan" of Marilyn Monroe (nor do I "hate" her, of course), I must say she was perfect - or thereabouts - for this role.








reply

My problem with this film is that it spreads itself too thinly between three lead characters. None of them have the required psychological depth to make them really believable. And for a thriller-cum-suspense film, it's notably lacking in, well, thrills and suspense. The film has plenty of nice touches to keep our attention but when the cinematography is the best thing about a film....

reply

It is a sub par Hitchcock wannabee.

Its that man again!!

reply