altpensacola says > Let me ask you this, since this move is listed as a fantasy, and we as the audience are given clues to the Pooka's actual existence, in the scope of the story, IF Harvey is real, is Elwood still pathetic to you?
Yes, because it still sends, what I think is, the wrong message. Even within the context of the movie, Harvey is an oddity. He exists in the mind of Elwood and perhaps to some degree for those who choose to play along.
Movies are fantasies in and of themselves but the fantasy descriptors are added to let audiences know what to expect. If the movie contains elements of the supernatural, leaving it unlabeled would certainly mislead and sometimes even offend audiences; not all of whom are interested in partaking in such things.
Supernatural, by the way, refers to anything that does not abide by the laws of science and nature. If we can't understand or explain something in those terms, it's supernatural. That means a lot more movies should be identified as fantasy but are not.
As I said before, my main problem is the idea that everyone in town had to play along with Elwood's delusions. It's actually presented as a good thing. If they don't play along, it's as if something was wrong with them. Compassion is one thing and most of us have it but being asked to join in on the delusional thinking is something altogether different and unacceptable.
Some people would put Religion and Faith in that category as well. Technically they would be but, at least in this country, we are free to follow or not follow a religion or any set of religious beliefs. On the other hand, there are lots of other things, especially recently, in which we don't all agree but, like the movie, we are all expected to, for the sake of the delusional, pretend we do. Atheists don't even have to do that. That's the wrong message the movie sends.
Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]
reply
share