stupid indians?


at first,
scenery and cinematography in this film is awesome,
even in lousy 4:3, as i saw it on tv...
john wayne acts great and the beginning seems pretty
realistic. but as the film approaches the end it becomes
more and more ridiculous.


*SPOILERS!!!*

- the first battle scenes seem logic and i was very
delighted not to see stupid indians riding and attacking
for their own bloodshed or the old "one shot - one kill"
cliche, but for me all this means nothing,
when it comes to the climax:
- as it seems 1000 (!!!) indian fighters (including families and old)
cannot guard their horses from 30 (!!!) attacking horsemen.
and the best: NO ONE of those gets killed or even injured
in the stampede and the indian defence.
this is even worse then the climax of king arthur
regarding logic and reality...
- the scene where 4 soldiers ride to the indian camp and
watch them selling guns from a hundred yards or so
is absurd. one would suppose that the indians had some guards
around their camp or as they watched the cavalry constantly
would follow them to the camp.

another weak point is the triangle love story.
i really could not gain ANY sympathy for that
selfish chicken stnading between two man, constantly
defying the first and adoring the other just to do
vice versa in the end with a lousy "sorry man,
it's like that..."

so with a crying eye i rate this 4, even though i love
western, john wayne and classic movies in general...

what do you think?
hepe

reply

Hepe,

I have to say I completely agree. Some good cinematography, particularly the scene where they ride through Monument Valley during a lightning storm, but the plot moves really slow, then whizzes along suddenly at the end.

Didn't really get why some of them were left behind to dig a trench or something. And what was Tyree supposed to have found when he got to that burned-out stagecoach? An Indian massacre, I guess, but that was poorly explained and unclear to those of us who aren't familiar with US history (e.g. me!) Maybe you have to be really into US history, and really into how the army works, to like this film.

As for me, I was bored. And what was with that fight scene at the end?! Suddenly it becomes a ridiculous and brawling over-acted comedy for 5 minutes. And yeah, that girl, the one with the yellow ribbon fooled around with both those guys and didn't deserve either of them (plus they were both really droopy and pathetic anyway).

I thought Fort Apache was great, but I couldn't get into this. Plus points were Wayne's portrayal of an old man (proves what a versatile actor he was), and the dry-witted Tyree.

4 out of 10!

Live slow, die old.

reply

Hey, duncmacdonald, here's some answers to the questions you brought up. Or at least I hope they answer them.

Brittles left Lt. Cohill and two squads behind at the Paradise River to buy them some time. C Troop needed to get back to Ft. Starke, and the Indians were following them as Ford shows in the different chiefs looking down on C Troop as they snake through the canyon. Then, as they're moving out you hear gunshots, which I assume means Cohill and Co. are under attack.

As for Tyree, one of my favorite characters, he's supposed to meet up with the Paradise River patrol and then head to Sudro's Wells where the stagecoach departs. They're supposed to get there and hold the stage so Mrs. Alshard and Olivia Dandridge can depart and get out of the area with the Indian tribes on the warpath.

And the fight scene, that's just John Ford being John Ford. In almost every movie he made, you'll find some unnecessary fight scene that has nothing to do with the story/plot. It was just his style. In this case, it gives Victor McLaglen a chance to show off his comedic chops. I'll agree though, the tone of the scenes doesn't always fit, but its entertaining if nothing else.

Hope this helps!

"Congratulations, Major. It appears that at last you have found yourself a real war." Ben Tyreen

reply

I'll agree though, the tone of the scenes doesn't always fit, but its entertaining if nothing else.


I thought the fight scene in the bar was out of place too, but like you said, it was indeed entertaining.

I think it showed how tough Quincannon was, in addition to showing McLaglen's comedic chops.

Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Cried

reply

There were some good points made about this movie (my all time favorite) but about Cpt. Brittles et al sneaking up on the gun runners in the Indian camp, they were Indians, not soldiers. Brave fighters, (the finest light cavalry in the world, to quote the film) but they were not into marching a guard post and other basic military procedures, I'll bet even Crazy Horse never got a snappy salute. Of course they were very good about sneaking up on soldiers who DID have guards posted but that's another topic.

reply

Raal indians were very stupid, or at least slack, about keeping guards posted. Otherwise the cavalry would have lost a lot most battles and would have had far fewer survivors in the old soldiers homes.

And it is quite possible that a troop of cavalry could charge an Indian camp and stampede the horse herd and get away without any soldier being wounded. Even young Indian boys would shoot their bows with very impressive accuracy, but in surprise attacks, Indians, being human, tended to get very excited and shoot wildly.

reply

When I watched the film I assumed that the fight scene was added as a decoy? John Wayne's character wanted to distract the men while he got back into uniform and slipped from the fort un-noticed?? This was the day he was supposed to be retiring...not going out on a mission. And his loyal sergeant would hardly have let him leave on his own. And Capt Brittles wanted the sergeant kept safe until his retirement hence why he asked for him to be kept in jail for the next 2 weeks! Or I could be entirely wrong......

reply

[deleted]

hepe---you might be too young to be overly critical of a 60 year old movie. Try Kung Fu Panda.

reply

It wasn't just to protect him from harm. He was protecting Quincannon from himself. He knew the Sgt. would likely get drunk and and risk his pension in the few weeks without Brittles. So, he arranged trouble to keep him out of greater trouble until his retirement. That's why he gets Major Allshard's word that there won't be charges and Quincannon will retire with his full rank and pension.

reply

Well.... I'm not sure why you wrote your post like a poem. The film was in 4:3 because it was made before widescreen processes were invented... And for the other points, I think that you're forgetting that it's a film.

I'm not sure whether this is a wind up post or not.

reply

hepe,

I agree with every word you say.

You wrote my post for me.

reply

Any movie made before The Robe in 1953 should be shown in 4:3 aspect ratio, with very few exceptions (e.g. The Big Trail), as for the rest of what the original poster said...whatever.

reply

What you seem to have missed is the fact that the warrior indian was pretty much on his way out at this time in history. The army was more of a policeman that kept the indians in check even though they could not do much. One line in the movie hints at this, something about being old warriors and the young ones just weren't enough in numbers. The Indian wars were very hard on native americans and it was more like the end of a holocaust than their robust earlier selves.

reply

Where IS this line in the movie?? I don't remember it.

Are you sure you're not thinking of the place in the movie when JW goes to see Pony that Walks with Ben Johnson (Tyree), and he leaves him with their horse, and tells him to locate the pony herd. He then walks toward the chief, and has the arrow shot at his feet by Red Shirt - he picks it up, breaks it in half, spits on it, and throws it back in his face (showing GREAT disrespect toward, and absolutely NO fear OF Red Shirt).

He then greets PTW, and says he saddened by what he sees - the young braves with war paint on, the drums beating war songs...PTW then says many will die. "Your young men - my young men" The women will sing the death song in the lodges tonight," and that he is and Nathan are too old for war, and that they should go way together and hunt buffalo and get drunk - let the young ones fight it out. Then JW agrees that they're too old for war, and then says that it's the old men's job to STOP wars. Upon hearing this, PYW sadly says goodbye to "Nathan, my brother." He knows that Nathan must do what he has to do, and that is basically it.

Of course, bloodshed is avoided, and, for the moment at least, order is restored

Nothing about numbers of warriors either old or young. Are you certain it was in THIS movie?

I don't act...I react. John Wayne

reply

Actually, as Indian Wars deceased in frequency, the military capabilities of the Indians increased.

General George Crook said that the Indians were more dangerous with bows and arrows than with muskets, but they were really dangerous when they were armed with repeating rifles.

During the 1860s through the 1890s more and more Indians obtained repeating rifles. The US army used single shot rifles and carbines from 1873 to the late 1890s. So in much of the 1880s and 1890s the US army was greatly outnumbered by the Indian men who had superior firepower and yet there were very few Indian Wars.

reply

I do agree with you about the ending. Very anti-climatic. It shows Indians coming out of their tents with their rifles and just firing them up into the air with no aiming to try to shoot soldiers. Some of the soldiers are just a few feet away from an Indian with a rifle and the soldier doesn't even pay attention to him, they just keep "whooping" the horses on with no attempt to stop the Indian from shooting! I am a BIG John Wayne fan and John Ford was his best director, but the ending was very thin. That may have kept them from getting an Oscar nom for this one.

reply

Most fights between the Army and Indians in the post Civil War period were skirmishes and running fights between small bodies of men and casualties were usually light. And it was actually fairly easy to catch Indian camps by surprise as Indian men were warriors, not soldiers, and lax about security and discipline.

The scene in which the soldiers run off the Indian herd, without suffering any losses, reminds me of Ranald MacKenzie and his 4th Cavalry capturing the Comanche herd in Palo Duro Canyon during the Red River War. MacKenzie's capture, and destruction of the herd, by putting the Comanche afoot took the fight out of them and ended the war. MacKenzie was the greatest Indian fighting cavalryman of the post Civil War army but it seems only those who know their history are familiar with him.

In short I think SWAYR is among the most realistic of the pictures about the Indian Wars.

reply

I can live with the ending. It seems rather unlikely that there would be no casualties, but it is within the realm of possibility.

I do agree that the love triangle was rather weak. Olivia Dandridge comes across as a selfish brat toying with both men's affections and I have no idea with the Captain kept defending her, but I suppose that could be overlooked too because the rest of the film was certainly impressive.

The only other thing I can't understand is everyone saying that John Wayne really acted like he was 60. His acting was great here no doubt, but he passed off as closer to 50 than 60. He really didn't look that old, especially when compared to Chief Pony That Walks and they were supposed to be around the same age.

Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Cried

reply