Forlorn_Rage says > Austin may have "loved" Catherine as he claimed as he showed by refusing to ever "disown" her, but that doesn't mean that he "liked" her. Catherine was correct when she said that.
1. He probably didn't like her but that's different than despising her, being cruel towards her, or being contemptuous of her; as Catherine said. She wasn't likable in the sense she wasn't good company: she didn't make conversation, she wasn't witty, they didn't share any interests, and she was just boring. As her father, Sloper also worried she wasn't living up to her full potential and couldn't look out for herself.
He didn't dislike her because she wasn't her mother though that point was painfully obvious and a constant reminder of what he'd lost. Think of it in terms of baking a cake. You put in all the right ingredients but it doesn't turn out the way you expected. You're going to be especially unhappy with the results knowing the quality and care you had put into it doesn't match what you got out of it. You would be embarrassed to serve it to your guests and, if you do, and the rave over it you won't believe a word of it. Either they have really bad taste or they're humoring you with their dishonesty.
2. Leaving Catherine her full inheritance didn't prove her father's love. The money was really the biggest problem in her life and he knew it. He didn't want to disinherit his only child because he wanted to provide for her after he was gone but it probably weighed heavily on him knowing the money would cause her to end up exactly as she did; alone and unable to trust the motives of any suitor.
If she had other things going for her, the money may not have factored into the equation as heavily as it did but it would still be a problem. Ironically, if her assets were great beauty, a glowing personality, and a sharp wit, it would be expected that men would be attracted to her for those reasons and it wouldn't matter. Women were expected to find husbands who could be good providers. Their other traits didn't matter nearly as much but the reverse was not acceptable. Morris had the looks, intelligence, wit, and was likable but as a man they were not considered sufficient assets for a good husband.
3. My point is that it wasn't Sloper's but society's conditions that were not being met. Sloper's 'dislike' of Catherine would have been on par with the how the parent of an unambitious son would feel; especially if his father had been very business-minded and successful. It's more frustration than dislike but it would be expressed in such a negative fashion it would be hard to distinguish.
Similarly, the money issue was societal as well. A Gold-digging female raised warning flags as well but only if they were from the wrong side of the tracks or were from outside the family's social class. Morris was within the Sloper's social circle especially since a close relative of his had married one of the Sloper's close relations.
Those standards didn't just exist at the time the story was set; they continue to exist today. The gender roles have changed only slightly.
Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]
reply
share