Who *should* have directed this?
I'm enjoying this on TCM now, not for the first time, and astounded at the parroting of 1948's conventional Hollywood wisdom by 21st century commenters. It's a strong story, albeit with a couple of creaky joints. I'd give it a 7 or 8 of 10. If George Cukor begs to differ, fine.
Robert Osborne just ran through the 4 director names attached to one or more shooting days - now, about 1 hour in, I'm surprised Jacques Tourneur wasn't among them. The setting (full of local customs, deeply felt), the noir tones, the emotional fragility overmatched by practical deviousness - these were his bread & butter. A Tourneur[?] joint would've been more languorous, perhaps, but at least as suspenseful, maybe more so. Anyway, that's tonight's parlor/den game. If you could go back in time to prevent all the off-camera drama, who would you ask to direct this film?
Optional fragility