MovieChat Forums > The Bishop's Wife (1948) Discussion > Grant's least favorite role

Grant's least favorite role


According to Grant himself, this was his least favorite role.



http://www.imdb.com/user/ur2533227/ratings
www.kittysafe.net

reply

I can understand why. This is my least favorite of his films, too.

reply

Ya, after seeing it I would agree with that as well.

http://www.imdb.com/user/ur2533227/ratings
www.kittysafe.net

reply

I agree. I think he's terribly miscast.

reply

I agree. I think he's terribly miscast.
Well, that's his fault, according to another thread on here, which says he was supposed to be the bishop and Niven was to play the angel originally, but Grant was adamant that he wanted to play the angel. Huge mistake on his part!

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

I wonder if that's because he was originally supposed to play the bishop.

How do the angels get to sleep when the Devil leaves his porch light on?

reply

I had always thought the role he truly hated was "Arsenic and Old Lace". I believe he felt he hammed it up way too much in that film.
Personally, I think this is a charming and heartfelt movie and he is just fine in it. Today, it is so rare to get such a positive and uplifting message from a film.

reply

His least favorite role was Arsenic and Old Lace. I think both movies are great. Cary Grant was actually first cast as the Bishop in this film and David Niven was the angel.

___
Think about what you learned today. One: Don't screw with me. Two: Invite me... to your crap!

reply

Personally I think it is one of Grant's best performances in one of his best films. I agree with your assessment.

Oh Lord, you gave them eyes but they cannot see...

reply

I agree with your ending sentiments. It was a really enjoyable film.
Merry Christmas.

Can you fly this plane?
Surely you can't be serious.
I am serious,and don't call me Shirley

reply

This is one of my favorite movies. Bringing Up Baby and Arsenic and Old Lace is his movies I don't like.

reply

You and I are opposites, I love Bringing Up Baby and Arsenic and Old Lace, but my favorite is The Philadelphia Story.




Web www.kittysafe.net
Fcbk https://www.facebook.com/catnipdream

reply

It's unrealistic. If I had an angel that looked like Cary Grant, I'd be in big trouble for all the impure thoughts!

Edit: To clarify, in reality, angels are androgynous.

Tabby S.

reply

"in reality, angels are androgynous"

Not sure where you get that from. Angels have often been depicted as either male or female and blatantly so.

http://imgur.com/zmJ4ZR4

reply

Only male - in the Bible when referenced, they are referred as masculine. When they appeared as humans, they appeared as men. Have you personally ever seen an angel? Once I saw an angel very clearly that was with someone who was about to pass away, and you definitely could not tell if "he" was male or female. I've only seen angels a few times in my life, and each time they appeared androgynous, imo. If you ever see someone in public who you can't tell if they're a boy or a girl, that's what an angel looks like. They are known as the "sons of God" because of their spiritual position in the heavenly realm - versus "daughters of God".

Tabby S.

reply

So basically like that kid at the beginning of Jurassic Park?

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090430165421/jurassicpark/imag es/c/c1/JP-VolunteerBoy.jpg

I'm like... "Boy?... Girl?..."

is.gd/cagedvirgins!

reply

lol. Yep, a real angel face.


Tabby S.

reply

Only male - in the Bible when referenced, they are referred as masculine.

In which languages?

In English, until *extremely* recently, it was always simply a rule of grammar that the masculine form always be used if the gender was indeterminate or unknown. The exclusive use of masculine forms in the language does not necessarily imply physical male-ness.

If you know more than I do about the original (untranslated) text, and the grammar rules of the ancient languages involved, then I would be interested in that information.

reply

Gee, that's a real shame you can't translate names like Michael, Gabriel, Raphael, etc. from the ancient languages.


Tabby S.

reply

I have read this also, but he is never less than professional. And very good in the role.

reply

Agreed!

---

Web: www.jmberman.com

reply

I thought Grant had the charisma for this role. If there are any of his roles I dislike, one which stands to mind is Kiss Them for Me (1957). There Grant seemed too old to be a genuine ladies man.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply

Cary is on the record as saying that ARSENIC AND OLD LACE was his least favorite of his films.

He loved THE BISHOP'S WIFE. It was his wacko ex wife Betsey Drake who later said she didn't like it.







"Do you indulge in any form of worship?"

reply

Robert Osborne, commentator on Turner Classic Movies, said that the film was supposed to star Dana Andrews and David Niven
as the angel. Cary Grant read the script and loved it. However he wanted the part of the angel. Since he was a bigger star
than Niven, he got the role of Angel Dudley. Dana Andrews was loaned out to another studio in a trade for Loretta Young.
I've read that Grant rather liked The Bishop'sWife. Personally, it's my favorite Christmas film.

reply

Kittysafe says > According to Grant himself, this was his least favorite role.
If that's true it's probably because he exuded all that usual charm but this time there wasn't the usual payoff of him getting the girl in the end. There's also no telling what went on behind the scenes; that often affects how an actor feels about a role. Whatever led him to say that, it certainly didn't keep him from delivering a magnificent performance!


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply