I dislike this technique of storytelling -- to start with the conclusion and then flashback to the details. I would prefer not knowing what is to come.
Love Story is another movie that starts with the ending, and I think it would have been much better if done differently.
But that's really the only flaw I can find with the movie. I just wish it didn't spoil its own ending.
I can understand your complaint with this technique, but I think it can be used very effectively. Billy Wilder used this technique very effectively in both Double Indemnity and Sunset Boulevard. What he did so well is that there was still very much mystery that needed to be revealed so that the viewer was constantly trying to aline the storyline with the conclusion. Incidentally, I think both films contain some of the best narration I've ever witnessed.
(Spoilers for Brief Encounter)
What I think is done so effectively with Brief Encounter's opening is that you first see their goodbye scene out of context. When you see it again in context there is so much added meaning and emotion. I actually think it is a rather nice technique.
The absolute must-see of this technique is Pinter's Betrayal, with Jeremy Irons and Patricia Hogue. Because you know about all the damage their affair does to themselves and their loved ones right up front, all the subsequent flashback scenes - which in any other context would be romantic and sexy - fill the viewer with dread. Instead of wanting the lovers to find some way to be together, you're dying for them to get the hell off the railroad tracks. You know a train is bearing down on them while everyone on the screen is oblivious.
Truly different. And Ben Kingsley is magnificent as the cuckolded husband.
_______________
Nothing to see here, move along.
Indeed.
share