A 'Dream ' Remake


I think this film is amazing for it's first 90 minutes. The ending keeps it from being an all time favorite though. It is so obvious that the studio interfered. I haven't been able to get past it in order to push this film into one of my all time favorites. But it is extraordinary for most of it. The ending does have a sort of smirking glee, like Lang is saying "here's your happy ending!" while he is really just mocking it.

Anyway, it's always fun to re-cast old movies with modern actors. This thread isn't a call for a remake -- just a healthy modern exercise. I think most people re-cast movies in their heads with modern actors, not as a disservice to the original actors, but rather -- what if this script came out now with the original ending, who would you cast?

Mine would be:
David Strathairn - Richard Wadley
Marion Cotillard - Alice Reed
Mark Ruffalo - Heidt
William Hurt - Frank Lalor
Ray Wise - Michael Barkstane

reply

And yet, 57 years later, one particular director would release a cult movie where the very ending that felt cheap to you here, was utilised to great effect and to the delight of many an audience :)

I didn't know that the end of the movie would have supposed to be different, in fact I didn't know much about the movie at all when I started watching it (which is always a good idea.) So after thinking that I was watching a "regular" film noir classic, the surprise ending did not feel cheap to me at all. Because I watched the above mentioned more recent movie before this one, I found it very amusing to find such an obvious inspiration to one of my favourite modern-day movies in a film from the 40s!

As for the topic of this thread, I am far from able to name a 'dream cast' because I just don't know enough about the names, looks and strengths of current actors (I only know one of the five names you mentioned yourself).

reply

Edward G Robinson was so amazing - it's really hard to imagine anyone else in one of his roles, isn't it. William H. Macy?

"It's as if God created the Devil...and gave him...JAWS"

reply

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'I think this film is amazing for it's first 90 minutes. The ending keeps it from being an all time favorite though. It is so obvious that the studio interfered. I haven't been able to get past it in order to push this film into one of my all time favorites. But it is extraordinary for most of it. The ending does have a sort of smirking glee, like Lang is saying "here's your happy ending!" while he is really just mocking it.'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I take a totally different view regarding the ending. When I first watched the movie (without knowing anything about it beforehand) I thought the entire movie was excellent, moving at breakneck speed and keeping the viewer constantly occupied. Then the shock ending added something extra making it an even more excellent movie.

The studio did not interfere with the making of the movie, it wasn't even a major studio production, it was made by an independent producer.

Without the surprise ending the movie would never have been allowed a release to be shown in cinemas!!!!!!! Film production at that time was rigorously examined and controlled not only by the Hays Office but also by the Catholic Legion of Decency and suicide was considered a mortal sin and would never have been permitted to have been shown on film in 1944!!!!!!!!!

reply

[deleted]

Richard Wanley... Harvey Keitel - towned down
Alice Reed... Maggie Gyllenhaal
Heidt... Vincent Cassel
Dist. Atty. Frank Lalor... J.K Simmons - under a hair hat
Dr. Michael Barkstane... Seymour Cassel

reply

Paul Giamatti - Richard Wadley
Catherine Zeta Jones - Alice Reed
Matt Damon - Heidt
Joe Montagna - Frank Lalor
Kevin Kline - Michael Barkstane

reply