One of the great films noir


Fritz Lang's The Woman in the Window (1944) is one of the great films noir. When I first saw it and saw that ending, I was surprised but not unhappy, as some of the posters here seem to be.

Then, years later, when I saw it for the second time, the whole thing fell into place beautifully... and my admiration for Lang, Edward G. Robinson, Joan Bennett, and Dan Duryea soared, that they could create such a beautiful motion picture.

Oh, I don't mean beautiful as in star-studded with color, marquee names, or a cast of thousands. I mean it is a beautiful film in the way it is constructed. Like a jigsaw puzzle that looks impossible to finish at first, but in the end you find that all the pieces fit together perfectly.

Don't want to make this post too lengthy. Just let me say that, if you've seen The Woman in the Window only once, you've had an enjoyable experience; but if you've seen it TWICE, the experience will leave you breathless.

How does a director -- Lang, in this case -- fit the pieces together so perfectly? From the opening scene, we find Robinson, as Professor Wanley, lecturing his class on the degrees of criminality involved in a murder. The points he makes come in very handy later, in his unexpected adventure. Also: The man (Arthur Loft) that Wanley supposedly kills halfway through the movie can be seen in the opening moments, as Charlie the hatcheck man. Dan Duryea, who plays the skunk who tries to blackmail Wanley and the beauty he's picked up (Joan Bennett), can't quite be seen as the doorman at the men's club in the early scenes, at least not on my copy... but the revelation is logical.

To my mind, this is a thriller twice as good as Vertigo (1958), that over-praised Hitchcock lollipop. In the latter film, Hitchcock cops out by revealing the ending to this mystifying puzzle to us, the audience, half and hour before it ends for real. I still haven't heard a satisfactory explanation for that abomination.

But The Woman in the Window neatly leaves all the pieces in their place, revealing nothing in advance, and challenges us to guess the ending.

And in a stroke of Wellesian genius, the great "transition" scene near the end echoes some of the stunning shots from Citizen Kane (1941). I dare say no more, for fear of revealing too much to those who have not seen this Lang masterpiece. But trust me, it is the work of a master indeed.

Cheers,
Dan





English subtitles are a MUST on all DVD releases!

reply

Fritz Lang's The Woman in the Window (1944) is one of the great films noir. When I first saw it and saw that ending, I was surprised but not unhappy, as some of the posters here seem to be.



They're unhappy because they think the ending is a cop-out.

I saw Scarlet Street later, and that one is a little too tragic for my taste.

Maybe something about halfway between Woman in the Window and Scarlet Street would be to more people's taste.

Besides, why did Lang make a second film with the same actors and destroy the happy ending?

Gabe

reply

"Hitchcock cops out by revealing the ending to his mystifying puzzle half an hour before it ends for real. I still haven´t heard a satisfactory explanation for that abomination".

How about: Vertigo is not a "puzzle", but an exploration of loss, grief and perverse obsession? It´s the ending of The Woman In The Window that´s a feel-good cop-out born out of sheer commercial calculation.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

I saw THE WINDOW IN THE WINDOW first when I was about ten, and I immediately loved it! The dozing off, waking up again seemed perfectly sensible and morally justified. Which is what gives the film a deeper level. Years later I saw it again, having good memories of the first viewing. I'm now happy to say that I have the dvd. It certainly is my favorite Fritz Lang film.




"When there is no more room in the Oven,
the Bread will walk the Earth."

reply

richard-III wrote:


I saw THE WINDOW IN THE WINDOW first when I was about ten, and I immediately loved it! The dozing off, waking up again seemed perfectly sensible and morally justified. Which is what gives the film a deeper level. Years later I saw it again, having good memories of the first viewing. I'm now happy to say that I have the dvd. It certainly is my favorite Fritz Lang film.



Right you are. But not everyone on this board seems to realize the true genius of this project.

When the Edward G. Robinson character takes the poison and appears to die in the armchair, what follows is an extremely long "take" during which we see him in closeup, but the objects around the armchair move. We see this peripherally, which to some means we don't see it at all. Then, when the attendant moves into the picture to awaken the Robinson character, we don't realize it, but it's still THE SAME SHOT.

Fritz Lang did not do a "cop out" by cutting to a different shot. He used THE SAME SHOT, during the nightmarish dream and afterward. I may be overstating by calling it "genius," but it certainly was a surprising touch.


Gabe

reply