Fritz Lang's moralistic fight for the 'dream' ending
I read here and there that Lang had to give in to the Hayes code and to the studio, that it was censorship working... all this was simply not the case!
The ever moralistic director made a moralistic choice by filming this 'dream' ending. And it was no trick ending, we can see the professor - at the beginning - dose off and fall asleep in his club chair.
Fritz Lang thought that it would be unjust to professor Wanley, to play a cruel trick upon him by giving him a bad ending. It's like killing off dear Mr Fezziwig in Dicken's Christmas Carol, or amicable Mr Micawber in David Copperfield!
Lang wrote "this would have been a defeatist ending, a tragedy for nothing brought about by an implacable Fate."
Lang really had to argue with his screenwriter to end the film as it does now. And Lang wasn't interested in keeping the studio happy. He thought it was a moral issue. It would be cruel, unjust and unnecessary to leave an innocent and good man - as he saw the professor that way - with such a fate. So Lang used the gifts of the gods: sleep. The professor fell asleep in his chair, and woke up again in his chair.
And this dream framing, a friendly reality frame around a noir nightmare, is exactly why it's my favorite little Fritz Lang film. Humanistic, like the films from the other famous director from the same period, Jean Renoir.
Sources:
- Lotte Eisner's book on Lang
- Frederick W. Ott's book on Lang
"I don't discriminate between entertainment
and arthouse. A film is a goddam film."