Movie name
Anybody know why this movies is called Mr. Skeffington instead of Mrs. Skeffington? Mrs. seems much more appropriate than Mr.
shareAnybody know why this movies is called Mr. Skeffington instead of Mrs. Skeffington? Mrs. seems much more appropriate than Mr.
shareIt is based on the book Mr. Skeffington
shareBasically, though the movie appears to be "all about Mrs. Skeffington, in the end, we understand it was never about her at all. The moral of the story is that it is indeed a story of what real love means and that is personified in the character of Mr. Skeffington's quote that "a person is beautiful if they are loved".
shareWell Bette wanted Claude Rains to be the first one to be credited for the movie but Jack Warner thought that the movie couldn't be sold under his name so thats why she has the first credit.
I've been lucky. I'll be lucky again--Bette Davis
[deleted]
But hold on a minute. Up until the point that Fanny realises that Job is blind, the audience is not convinced that she'll take him back. It's only when she knows that he can't see her that she can accept him back - ie when she once again is controlling the relationship. She is self centred and narcissistic throughout, and the apparent magnanimity of her acceptance of Job is in reality a mixture of pity and power. So I can't agree! I also find her portrayal of Fanny rather one dimensional particularly in the early part of the film.
share[deleted]
You say that Job gave her a moral position. But I still argue that the script tells all. WHY was Job blind in that last scene? Because Fanny simply wouldn't have taken him back unless he had been blind. Fanny has no moral position. She realises that the pragmatism of the psychotherapist is right and cannot stand being alone. So, she takes Job back - keeping the power in the relationship- living the role that she is still beautiful. She is self delusional in that regard and still self obsessed. Her relationship with her daughter is a reference point here- she has left and Fanny is determined not to be deserted again. Fanny, at the end is more shallow and unpleasant than she has ever been.
share[deleted]
You bring up very good points that are (possibly unintentionally) even backed up by the movie, itself. Particularly at the end, when Cousin George says Job will always "think of her as young and beautiful" in his mind.
Good grief, as if the constant reinforcing of "woman is only beautiful when she is loved" isn't enough, they had to keep on talking their way, what could've been, a great ending.
I believe your excellent point is borne out in the final line in the film, in which Fanny tells Manby to phone the (fictitious?) lady friend to say she won't be able to meet her for lunch. Not only is that an indication that she has a new preoccupation (the line has been used several times previously when Fanny needed an excuse to pursue a new interest) but it also suggests that she is-- despite her seeming epiphany-- "the same old Fanny." Her sudden realization that she is a woman alone is made less onerous by the knowledge that not only is faithful old Job back in her life but there is the added bonus of his not being able to see her as aged and less than beautiful. In addition, Job's blindness will make him more dependent upon her, a circumstance which gives Fanny even more power over him.
share[deleted]
Mrs. seems much more appropriate than Mr.
To err is human, but it feels divine.
-Mae West-
In her autobiography, THE LONELY LIFE, Davis herself mistakenly (?) refers to the film as Mrs. Skeffington - the error appears in the original Putnam hardcover edition published in July, 1962, and also appears in a November, 1990 paperback reprint by Berkley Books.
Having spent a lot of money on the film, Warner Bros. was in quandry as to how to market it - they used a contemporary head-shot of Davis in the advertising and played down the period-setting of most of the film . . .
I just found it ludicrous the way all these men were trailing after her as though no other woman existed - even when Fanny was practically middle-aged (before her illness) - all those young swains at the country-club, tongues a-hanging...it just never seemed real to me, though whether because of the shallowness of the character herself, or Davis, I just can't really say. In that light I suppose it actually is one of Davis's most commendable performances (though not among my favorites), because she certainly made no attempt to downplay Fanny's shallowness and vanity, which a more physically beautiful actress might well have done (and which would have been a complete mis-reading of the part).
"I don't use a pen: I write with a goose quill dipped in venom!"---W. Lydecker
[deleted]
Mr. Skefftngton is one "Beautiful Movie" on which Miss Davis uses her magic on screen to give us another great performance!!
share
I think it should be called simply "Skeffington" - or "Mrs. Skeffington".
As it is, it always strikes me as being somehow odd.
Why "Mr. Skeffington"? Because when this movie was made it was still a man's world. And that's what this movie is all about. The tag line for the movie and the final message of the movie is Mr. Skeffington's words, "A woman is only really beautiful if she is loved.". Obviously by a man. Fanny's previous beauty, her legions of admirers, everything she had ever done in her life were meaningless and her life only came to have meaning when she took Job back into her life and allowed him to love her and returned that love. It's a lousy message but a lot of great movies were made on the premise of this and other lousy messages.
shareNothing to do with the title, but in the original novel by "Elizabeth" the setting was English, not American.
"I don't use a pen: I write with a goose quill dipped in venom!"---W. Lydecker
[deleted]
Not really. Bette Davis was the "name brand" at the time. When someone said, "Let's go see the new Bette Davis movie", people got excited and went, not even necessarily even knowing what the movie was about. People knew who Claude Raines was, but he didn't "sell" a movie, sight unseen the way that Bette Davis did.
[deleted]
[deleted]
True. This is isn't as common today. People don't follow the actor brand as much as they follow the director and/or screenwriter brand today.
sharei'm used to the swedish title of this, and agree that it didn't quite feel right when i saw the original english title. funniest scene was when her daughter had returned, and the man says "i cant call you both fanny, i'll call you young fanny, and you... well.. ill think of something".
you said you would be here tonight,
you let me down so many times,
until you put out my pride,
as any hope for better times,
though you're the girl of my dreams,
cant stand the careless way you're treating me,
i don't receive a bit of affection from you,
but still can't reason with my heart making me a fool.
It's because in those days they played it straight. You had to be a good character to be the title character, not like today where hit men, womanizers and other bastards headline films and series. It''s a Bette Davis vehicle all right, but the title tells you from the start which character to admire.
share