Tone of the ending


Now I would like to begin with stating that I really liked this film. It had some very strong scenes and memorable characters, probably more so than most other Hitchcock films. However the ending is bizar. Hitchcock himself was reportedly unhappy with the it. He found it to be awkward for the audience to sympathise with the real saboteur, Fry as he hangs by mere threads from the Statue of Liberty. I share that view. When Barry ultimately fails to save him it is strange that upbeat music begins along the credits not much later. Perhaps it would have been more interesting if Barry the protagonist was the one in danger as he did with North by North-West. I really like the setup of the scene, the sleve ripping and so on but ultimately it could perhaps have been saved had Fry not dropped the gun thus still making him a threat.

reply

It is kind of odd, but I think it works in an odd kind of dark way. That he is, in the end, just a helpless man dangling by a thread. That Barry, in spite of everything, will still try and save him.

___
http://tinyurl.com/62gch4o

reply

He found it to be awkward for the audience to sympathise with the real saboteur

Personally it depends on the individual viewer but in my case I did not feel sympathy for Fry. The ending was not designed to feel sympathy for Fry but to create a tense finale. The silence of the scene along with the various camera angles from the high angled shot of Barry holding onto Fry to the close up of Fry's sleeve tearing away created a tense atmosphere.

Commenting on the last message of this thread, the only reason Barry attempted to save Fry was so he could be apprehended by the Police.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply