MovieChat Forums > Rebecca (1940) Discussion > My one quibble with Rebecca and Suspicio...

My one quibble with Rebecca and Suspicion...


Joan Fontaine was so delightful in both movies and I loved her performances, but in my opinion she was way too attractive to be considered "plain." I almost have to laugh when the other characters treat her like she was a frump. Boring sweaters and flat heels can't disguise the fact that she was just lovely. :)

reply

Yes--but she played a 'frump' very well. Her shyness and hesitancy were endearing. So I believed people would treat her that way. But yeah--Fontaine was a doll.

reply

. . . c7, I agree, she was attractive, but was shy, a stay-at-home, not worldly at all . . . and she does carry it off well . . .

reply

I agree. When Ms. Danver said something about how Rebecca was the most beautiful woman, I just thought, more beautiful than Joan? Seriously, those people needed glasses or something, Joan was gorgeous and I highly doubt Rebecca was more endearing. And the fact that Joan's character was so naive and modest about her beauty made her even more likable.


reply

I agree with the OP. I loved her performances, but she was ultimately too pretty.

I recently watched "Nothing But the Truth" with Kate Beckinsale and she was far too pretty for her character. It's funny because after it was over, the first thing I thought about was Olivia in The Heiress and Joan in Rebecca.

reply

My quibble is that her performance is Rebecca is far superior to her performance in Suspicion. She did deserve the Oscar for both films, but ESPECIALLY Rebecca.

reply

Joan Fontaine was absolutely beautiful and incredibly under-rated.

reply

Well, moviebuff-11 is right, Joan Fontaine was too beautiful to be considered plain, but as c7c7c7r pointed out she played the frump well. Her shyness was almost painful to watch.

Also, as someone else pointed out, Olivia in "The Heiress" was the same case.

But then again, people forget that "plain" women on film can never be portrayed by really plain women. They have to be portrayed by beautiful women made to look homely. Nobody would watch a movie with a really unattractive actress.

Jessica Rabbit
"I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way."

reply

IMHO I think the movies defined beauty= glamour... Joan Fontaine a beauty but not glamourous (spl?)

reply

I think in the movie the point was meant to be that this was the 40s and it was the time of glamour and glitz and when I think of how Rebecca was MEANT to look, I'm thinking probably sequins, dark hair always elaborately styled, dark smouldering makeup and red lips, just seeing briefly what was in her wardrobe it's obvious that she was supposed to be the epitome of fashion and glamour.

Then comes the Second Mrs. de Winter, and here she is, a mousy blonde who doesn't wear makeup (or if she does, very little of it), does very little with her hair, wears drab and practical clothes, and in comparison to someone AS glamourous as Rebecca is supposed to be, it'd be impossible to find her as attractive.

When I think of how Joan portrayed the character, it's as a woman who is shy, skittish, and has no idea of how attractive she is - thus shocked Maxim is in love with her. Then you have Rebecca, and from what I can tell of the character, Rebecca was stunning and quite fully aware OF it. Someone who isn't aware of her beauty and has very little confidence would be compared in such a way to someone who was confident AND stunning quite the way that is shown in this movie.

It's her lack of confidence that allows people to treat her the way she does. Yes, people are aware she's pretty, but they're also aware she is nothing in comparison to how fantastic Rebecca appeared to them and that is why they don't find her stunning.

reply

Boring sweaters and flat heels can't disguise the fact that she was just lovely. :)


hahaha, I totally agree, Joan Fontaine was stunning, she was so ethereal and lovely. And her performances were always so endearing, she was a good actress as well.

In the book, I thought of Mrs de Winter as someone normal looking, not ugly, but nothing special.

I agree with the person above me. It actually kind of added to the character in a way. Joan Fontaine's Mrs de Winter I think is someone who is beautiful but doesn't know because she's never been glamorous or had anyone to tell her how pretty she is. Max loves her because unlike Rebecca, she is stunning but doesn't even take any pride in it. I don't think it was supposed to be like that, but it added to the movie!

I agree about Suspicion though, and also Jane Eyre. Do you see anything at all 'irregular and marked' about her features?

Songbird, you've got tales to tell.

reply

^ exactly this. and its not that she is meant to be ugly, i suppose next to rebecca she must have looked plain, but ugly, i doubt it. besides that, she could be pretty and no one would have noticed it, being so dazzled by someone like rebecca. she was in the background because she didn't stand out enough but it doesn't mean she was ugly. compared to rebecca, plain maybe but its not quite the same as being truly ugly or boring or frumpy

-------------------------------------------------------
OCOE - obsessive compulsive olive eater

reply

Couple of comments on this thread.

Joan Fontaine in Suspicion. This is really a subject for the board for that film, but for this film, I think there is a singular distinction between the two characters. Lena in Suspicion is very early in the film seen in an unattractive outfit, with glasses hiding her face, and an awful hat that also was covering her. This was during her first meeting with Carey Grant's character, Johnnie. The second time we see Joan Fontaine without any hindrances to her appearance, and she is literally dazzling, this being where she is riding on a horse. One could argue there has never been a more dazzling actress shown on screen than in that shot.

Johnnie says to himself "That can't be the same girl!" But of course what he really means is she is the same one. So that imo greatly differentiates the two films and their respective portrayals of Joan's characters.

Maxim's view of Joan's Character v. the stated views of others. While it is true specifically in the boathouse scene that Maxim refers to Rebecca as beautiful, it is also true that he never says she was more beautiful than the second Mrs. de Winter. He does however strongly imply that his second wife's manner of dress, hairstyle and makeup is preferable to him. Of course this is to a great deal because after many years he has no doubt had it with the kind of pampered and glammed up look that his first wife used. But he is also I think quite happy to have found Joan's character as she was, and is amused by her lack of self confidence. But he is not confused by such lack, and at no point I think is there a single shred of evidence that HE sees her as plain or less than beautiful.

Who then gives the viewer the impression that Rebecca was so beautiful? Early on we get that info from Edythe van Hopper, but we also note that she is generally impressed by "personalities" of the sort the de Winters certainly were. I do not mean to suggest Mrs. van Hopper is in this respect an unreliable source so much as that any comparison between Rebecca and Joan's character is not one she would be inclined to make in the first place, and certainly not fairly if she was so inclined, in any event.

The most overt expression of someone speaking from personal knowledge about Rebecca's appearnce comes from Frank Crawley, and of course we must acknowledge he makes quite an overt testimonial in that regard. I even find the scene a bit odd, even if he believes every word he says. Can't he see and hear his own words how he is running down the second Mrs. de Winter to her face, at least in comparing Rebecca to her?

Perhaps Frank, unlike Maxim, was still dazzled by Rebecca's glamour. As someone mentioned above, that period was one where the ideal look was only slowly moving away from the highly made up and elaborately hairstyled looks that were ascendant in the twenties into the thirties. Joan Fontaine herself had pictures that can be found around the internet showing her with that glamorous look. But in the context of the film, perhaps we are to understand that Maxim has in effect seen through the artifice and all the effort, in terms of clothes, hairstyle, makeup, and Frank has not. Frank has not seen that Joan's character is merely shy, and her natural look is not what he expects.

I have elsewhere noted that there is a class element here as well. The highly stylized look took a certain amount of money among other things. Time and money. Rebecca had both, and she used them to her as they used to say advantage. Perhaps we are meant to see Frank as still under the sway of that kind of conventional perception.

Ironically Jack Favell seems to find the second Mrs. de Winter quite attractive, although we can't be sure whether he would pay attention to any if you will merely pretty woman. But I think he certainly finds her attractive, on balance.

In other words it is not all that clear that in the end we are really meant to literally believe that Rebecca was more attractive than Joan Fontaine.

And yes, ftr I agree with those who say Joan Fontaine was exceptionally beautiful. She has even aged extremely well. Count me a huge fan. But perhaps you all might also catch her in Jane Eyre, where much was in fact done with makeup, hair and lighting to make her less than the great beauty she was. But still many feel she was far too pretty for that role as well. oh well...

reply

i don't think favell was exactly fussy about women if the second wife took his fancy also

-------------------------------------------------------
OCOE - obsessive compulsive olive eater

reply

" don't think favell was exactly fussy about women if the second wife took his fancy also"

Geez how does that follow? I don't think that makes any sense.

reply

self explanatory. favell appeared to have an eye for the ladies. he may have been romping with rebecca when she was alive but if the second mrs de winter also caught his eye, it gives the impression that he would go after anything in a skirt. how did that not make any sense?

reply

True, but she was good enough an actress to convince me that she was a "plain Jane" in this movie.

~~
💕 JimHutton (1934-79) and ElleryQueen 👍

reply

It's not so important that she was beautiful as that she was able to convey insecurity. She didn't seem to believe she was beautiful. That's all that matters. It makes her sympathetic as well because we all wish she could see herself as she might be and take command of the situation. Her insecurity is a vulnerability that makes her appealing.

reply

Manin,

Very much so. To be exact her insecurity in the context of her overall character added to her appeal.

In other words I don't think insecurity by itself is appealing. I trust you know what i mean.

reply

People have had a similar discussion about The Enchanted Cottage (1945), in which the idea that the woman is plain and unattractive is a major focus of the film, but most people seem to agree that Dorothy McGuire was not unattractive, no matter how plain they made her hair and clothes for the film.

In Rebecca, the emphasis is not so much on the idea that she is unattractive, but more--as others point out in this discussion--that she is not glamorous and self-confident.

reply

Yes, well that's a movie tradition. A beautiful woman in flat shoes or eye glasses is to be accepted as plain.

reply