Brother/Sister (?)



Many years ago a friend explained that WUTHERING HEIGHTS was actually about incest. Would Mr. Earnshaw have brought home some random street urchin? There were a lot of hungry children in British cities back in those days. Earnshaw brings home this boy and wants him to sleep in Hindley's room -- not in the servants' quarters.

More likely Heathcliff was the illegitimate child of Earnshaw and some woman (mistress?).

Do you think the filmmakers were aware of this in the casting? Casting Heathcliff and Cathy so they truly do look like brother and sister.



"The good end happily, the bad unhappily, that is why it is called Fiction."

reply

One of the oddities of Romanticism when Bronte wrote the book was the preoccupation of writers like Shelley, Wordsworth, etc., with androgeny and the taboo notion of brother/sister love. Simply put, Cathy and Heathcliff are raised as brother and sister and can never be a real couple. Cathy herself says, "I am Heathcliff." Notice in the novel who astonishingly similar their anger is. If you want to read about this, consult the book "Sexual Personae" by Camille Paglia. She is a scholar and literary critic. The book is fascinating on this topic.

reply

I had never thought of it before but there is alot of incest and quasi incest in the books of the time...and i am reminded that in the book of frankenstein Elizabeth is Frankenstein's foster sister also.....

It is not our abilities that show who we truly are...it is our choices

reply

Nope, you're not the first to come up with that interpretation. What's more, the Timothy Dalton version practically states it outright! (Mrs. Earnshaw is heard to snap at her husband, "How dare you bring your doings into my house!")

The recent (2008, was it?) version on Masterpiece Classic also hinted at such rumors in town about Heathcliff, but never confirmed it.

And now that I've read that theory, it's hard for me to "unsee" it as a real possibility...doesn't it seem a bit odd that Earnshaw headed out of town on unspecified "business", just happened to take pity on a random street orphan with Earnshaw-like dark hair and eyes, and give him the name of a deceased son of the family? (I'm not sure if Heathcliff's actually supposed to have Roma-like features, or if he was just called "gypsy" because of his dark coloring and unknown parents.)

It's like Lucy Van Pelt once said...the perfect theory is the kind that can't be proven one way or the other. :-)

reply

The novel does not explicitly state so but strongly implies it.

We can probably thank Lord Byron as the theme is rare in Western literature before he arrived on the scene.

Prior to that, we have to go back to the Greeks, Romans and of course, the Bible.

reply

[deleted]

I am currently reading the novel and the introduction by Daphne Merkin includes this paragraph:
<<<<But by far the most intense psychological scrutiny was reserved for the close relationship between Branwell and Emily (Bronte brother and sister). After Charlotte (their older sister)had given up on him as a bad egg, Emily continued to stand by her older brother, calming him down and getting him to bed during his drunken outbursts. This aspect of the Bronte family life led to speculations about a possible incestuous aspect to Branwell and Emily's relationship, especially in regard to it's being the model for the relationship between Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff. (One theory suggested that Heathcliff was in fact the bastard son of Mr. Earnshaw and thus Catherine's half brother.)>>>>>

reply

One theory suggested that Heathcliff was in fact the bastard son of Mr. Earnshaw and thus Catherine's half brother.


High school was a long time ago but as I recall, that was a theory briefly raised by my high school English teacher. She had a wonderful way of pointing out things like that in her reading assignments.

I far preferred, both then and now, the movie version with Laurence Olivier over the book.

They should stop attempting to remake the movie. One cannot improve on perfection.

reply