MovieChat Forums > Bringing Up Baby (1938) Discussion > Why was the film not well-received?

Why was the film not well-received?


This is one of the few films I own (on DVD) and one of my favorites. Everybody I talk to says that it's one of their favorites. Can anybody offer up some reasons why audiences back in the 30's didn't like or 'get' this film? I really can't figure it out and would love to know.

Anybody?

reply

Kate Hepburn was on the verge of being labeled box office poison. Her films just weren't doing well. Also, I believe a lot of audiences didn't like how aggressive her character was and how fast paced the film was.

reply

Yes, the film was fast paced and Kate races from joke to joke, from what I've heard audiences didn't like this at the time, they preferred the type of humour that's slower and more deliberate. It says a little about the film's lack of commercial success on the trivia page:

'Howard Hawks said that he failed at making a good comedy here because of the characters were too "madcap", with no straight men/women to ground it. This comment may have resulted from his disappointment at the film's commercial failure at the time of its release, although many now consider it Hawks' best film.'

The comedy is appreciated now but it wasn't then.

reply

Grant played the equivalent of a retarded child at the mercy of a school yard bully. Where's the comedy in that?

reply

Because it isn't very good.

reply

'Cause audiences back then were apparently more sensible.

reply

Agreed, try as I might, I can never get interested in this movie.

reply

I had to watch this film in my film studies class. Half way through the movie, everyone in the class wanted to commit suicide or kill Katharine Hepburn's character. I seriously consider this one of the worst movie I have ever seen because it is the only movie that has actually made me angry just by watching it.

reply

yea, i really think they should only show you guys in the film studies class what you want. next movie would be Alone in the Dark...

reply

Exactly. The Hepburn character starts out 'wacky', then quickly becomes just incredibly annoying, her voice like fingernails on a chalkboard.

I've never seen a movie where each character calls the other one by their name every 15-30 seconds..."Yes, David", "But Susan", "yes David", etc., etc., etc.

Extremely overrated film.

reply

I've never seen a movie where each character calls the other one by their name every 15-30 seconds..."Yes, David", "But Susan", "yes David", etc., etc., etc.


Titanic... "Jack!" "Rose!" "Jack!" "Rose!" "Jack!"... etc.

.

reply

The "bad girl" conquers the hero and takes him away from the orderly girl. Probably not such a likeable story. The remake "What's Up, Doc" did gross better so that it seems that the open-mindedness had increased, meanwhile.

reply

Good question. This movie is AMAZING! I guess audiences back then didn't understand the humor.

reply

Because it's crap?

reply

Agree! It was a steaming pile of feces. The audiences back then didn't lie to themselves.



RIP Paul Newman 1925-2008. Words can't express how much you will be missed.

reply

What is wrong with you people? Are you that miserable with you own life, that you need to take out your frustrations on perhaps one of the top 5 comedies of all time? It makes me sad to read these negative thoughts on a movie that does nothing make me smile and laugh out loud through out. I can only imagine that your favorite movies are a sequential number of films that start with
"Police Academy"

reply

Maybe it's because back then they didn't have the current mass hypnosis problem tricking people into believing that BUB is: a) a great movie b) funny

This is truly the worst and least funny of the well-known screwball comedies. Hal Roach's Turnabout is probably worse and more annoying but much lesser known, while Hawks' own Twentieth Century may be nearly its equal in its ability to annoy audiences with screeching/yelling characters.

The fans of this film are either idiots or perhaps are wearing nostalgia-colored glasses. Obnoxious and overbearing DOES NOT equal funny. I feel like this is an ancient precursor to Adam Sandler movies. Yes, I said it, Katherine Hepburn's character in BUB is as annoying as Adam Sandler's worst characters. I can't imagine even Paul Blart: Mall Cop (mentioned by another BUB defender) being less funny than this film.

I can name two other screwball comedies with Cary Grant and Katherine Hepburn and BOTH were much better than this (Holiday, The Philadelphia Story).

----------
'Life is Beautiful' is to Holocaust movies what 'Twilight' is to vampire movies.

reply

[deleted]

It is a great movie, with a lot of hilarity. However, one has to be open to the dialogue. It's easy to miss a lot of it, if you're not listening. One has to be open to watching everything, as well. If you miss what you're meant to see, then you miss the physical comedy. It's a movie that does require your attention, but not in the sense that you'll lose what's going on, as in a suspense. I don't understand the hatred for this movie. I think people do try to read too much into movies. Instead of being entertained, they are disappointed because they spent the whole time overthinking what was supposed to be going on, and miss out on being amused. It has nothing to do with nostalgia, as I have read from posters/commenters, that this movie is so highly rated. It has to do with great comic timing and deliverance. I saw this movie long before I became the classic film fanatic I, now, am. It was one of the first truly HILARIOUS movies I'd ever seen. That's what I like about it. It helped ease me into the world of black and white movies. I loved this movie so much, and the dialogue especially, that I actually taped it to an audio cassette to listen to when I went to bed at night. My grandma was strict about bedtimes, and I didn't have a TV in my room. I was heartbroken when the tape broke. :'( Cary Grant's portrayal in this movie is pure genius. People that seem to hate this movie are appalled that he played such an emasculated character. I don't think of him that way, at all. He was just a naive soul, at least he starts out that way. I think by the time the film ends he is more masculine and more 'worldly'. But it's the in between time that makes his performance classic Grant, to me. His flustered actions appear in The Bachelor And The Bobby Soxer, as well. I love the scenes where he acts like he's going to speak but can't. His expressions are the greatest. He was perfect.Also, I don't believe the 'appletree' mistake was actually a mistake on Grant's part, but more so of the character's. He was so intent on keeping an eye on the dog, that he really paid very little attention to all that was going on around him. To me, that was the joke, but per IMDB it was a 'goof'.
Ms. Hepburn was great here, too. I've never enjoyed any of her other performances nearly as much as I did this one. I've read she's annoying, she can be, but that's the point, because she really isn't all that bright. We all know how annoying not-so-bright people can be. (Check out these boards.) I don't feel that what she did to keep David around was mean-spirited, either. Actually, most of the movies from the time that had a woman pursuing a man were of that manner. They used ploys to get the man they wanted and whatever ploy it took to get rid of the competition. Wait, that still goes on in today's movies...doesn't it?
The remaining cast, to me, was just as exceptional. All played their parts to the hilt.

reply

Good said. People object to the facts in this movie to much cos they compare them with themselves/analayze it.
Go with the flow, enjoy it, I'd suggest. That's the way this kinda movies should be seen.
And noone in this movie is evil. I can't think of one act that is done from evil in this movie. She wants him.,.just has a funny way of showing it.

There is time for everything. Don't hurry.

reply

[deleted]

Not what people were expecting from Cary Grant?

Tabby S.

reply

I first watched this some years ago and didn't know the popularity of it. I loved it the fist time and finished watching it for the second time earlier, today. Being a classic film fan I get the lingo. My guess is that modern audiences don't like as much, because it doesn't have any special effects! But it certainly has action! Also, I would think audiences, then, enjoyed the movie as much as I did. I mean, come on, it was different because it was so fast and funny. I just can't see early movie-goers hating this film.
Where are you getting this info that it wasn't a success?






"I have no memories I'm prepared to share with you."- Peter O'Toole

reply

BUB did very poorly at the box office when it was first released and was one of the reasons Kate Hepburn was labeled box office poison. I think it was unpopular then for the same reason its unpopular now with some people. Its very frenetic and Hepburn's character is very aggressive for a woman.

reply

Because in case you didn't know yet, people suck.

If you don't believe in Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, put this in your sig.

reply