Didn't this movie violate the censorship code? (spoiler)
Although obviously based on the Leo Frank/Mary Phagan case, the film claims
to be fictitious. If so, how did it get away with its ending? Not so much the
lynching itself, but the success of Claude Rains' character at the end. Wasn't
this a violation of the Hollywood production codes of that era, as it was
depicting the triumph of evil? Griffin's primary motive in getting Hale
convicted seemed to be based less on the likelihood of his being the murderer
as it was that he seemed to Griffin the suspect most likely to get Griffin the
maximum amount of attention.
I'm not crying, you fool, I'm laughing!
Hewwo.