What was the deal with Davis coming back in and fainting and her misogynist fiance had to cover for her -- was that about she'd witnessed an execution and couldn't handle it? because she's a woman, of course! (As if men never fainted or got sick at something like that) The next thing I saw was where they had written identical stories for their respective papers, not about the execution but about a singer named Mabel Gaye who'd mysteriously dropped dead on stage, is that right? But how did they get from the execution to Mabel Gaye?
No, all I saw was the headline, and the reporters all repeating the words "Mabel Gaye dies singing" because the identical one appeared in both papers having been written by Devlin.
I think you were right the first time, I think Mabel Gaye was the condemned criminal. This is what happens when the cat starts asking to go outside and the teakettle starts whistling at the same time and when I read the words "dies singing" the first thing that comes into my head is Jackie Wilson.
The next thing I saw was where they had written identical stories for their respective papers, not about the execution but about a singer named Mabel Gaye who'd mysteriously dropped dead on stage, is that right? But how did they get from the execution to Mabel Gaye?
To answer your question a mere four years after you posed it: Mabel Gaye was a Broadway singer who, as near as I could make out, ended up killing her lover (or perpetrated some other "crime of passion").
The story Curt Devlin (George Brent) first composed (for his own newspaper) had him telling the editor over the phone something like "Her career began with a song on Broadway and ended with a song at 4:33am this morning" (I'm paraphrasing here). Of course, he meant to rewrite the story he gave to Ellen's (Bette's) paper so that it would be different than the one he filed for his own, but, of course, things got fouled up and the two stories were printed as dictated (i.e. they were exactly the same).
Anyway, the gist was that Mabel Gaye was a singer who went wrong and ended up in the electric chair as a result (just as you surmised in your later post).
One other thing:
What was the deal with Davis coming back in and fainting and her misogynist fiance had to cover for her -- was that about she'd witnessed an execution and couldn't handle it? because she's a woman, of course! (As if men never fainted or got sick at something like that)
You have to remember that the movie is all about Ellen and Curt competing against one another. Without Bette fainting at the beginning, how are we, the audience, to know that, compared to Curt, she is relatively green and inexperienced? The idea is that, as the film progresses, she becomes more and more savvy and, of course, ends up scooping him in the end.
(I mention this because I think you're being a little too hard on the screenwriters who came up with the plot in 1935. The important thing is that, in the end, Ellen becomes a Front Page Woman exactly the way she set out to be.
If a woman fainting gets the film charged with misogyny, what of the misandry? The all-too-typical storyline of simple girl surprises arrogant man and gives him his comeuppance? Typical film misandry. All men are arrogant fools and all women are more clever than men and beat them in the end.
Yeah, I can't stand it when they do that, either. It's why I don't watch sitcoms, except ones like MASH or All in the Family where everyone is guaranteed to be made out to be an idiot and a wise, clever person sooner or later.