HOWWWWWWWWWWWWOLDISSHE?
This movie's story was simple, quite plain, but it's worth taking a peek at just to see the lovely Ms. Stanwyck in her underwear. She was quite a hottie.
[deleted]
I think this is Barbara at her sexiest and best-looking under age 30. The publicity stills for this movie (in books like STARRING MISS BARBARA STANWYCK) are gorgeous.
shareShe is so gorgeous, and look how healthy she is, she's naturally small framed but she has just the right amount of meat on her, no skin and bones, she looks so soft, also, she never had a bust to speak off, no actress today would show that off, but who cares? It doesn't matter, she's still sexy, guys, this is what a real woman looks like!
shareI really like that she didn't look cookie-cutter and processed, like the typical Hollywood star/starlette of the times did. She was allowed to retain her own unique look.
shareI don't know if a still exists, but this movie has my favorite of Stanwyck that I've seen so far and that's right after she slaps George Brent in the bedroom, she doesn't have much make up on but she looks so good, such pretty hair and eyes.
I just love her body when she disrobes in the bedroom scenes, her arms, legs, just the perfect right amount of meat, and creamy skin, she's really beautiful here, like I said in my last post, this is what a real woman looks like.
Stanwyck was plenty sexy in the 20s and 30s.
Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Criedshare
To answer the original poster's question: the movie was released in July of 1932, the same month she turned twenty-five. So, she was twenty-four when filming took place.
share