How much did it make?
Of course the budget was over $4mil, which was huge in that era of filmmaking, but how did it pan out $ wise?
shareOf course the budget was over $4mil, which was huge in that era of filmmaking, but how did it pan out $ wise?
shareThis film cost $3.8 million, so expensive that it made no profit on its first release. (Found in the "trivia" section for this film.
I finally got to watch The Aviator tonight and it fueled my interest in Hughes.... I found this tidbit on a bio site about him...
"Following the summer of 1924, Howard and Ella moved to Hollywood to pursue Howard's interest in making movies. When his first attempt failed, he hired Noah Dietrich to head the movie subsidiary of his tool company, and Lewis Mileston as director. The new team won an academy award for Two Arabian Nights (1928). Their next film, Hell's Angels (1930), written and directed by Hughes and starring Jean Harlow, was the most expensive movie of its time at a cost of $3.8 million. This movie, about World War I aviators, lost $1.5 million at the box office but allowed Hughes to indulge his interest in flying."
But then I got to thinking... How much is that in today's dollar... So I searched...
$3.8 million in 1930 would be about $45 Million in today's dollars... The amount the movie cost...
$1.5 million would be about $17.5 million in today's dollar... The amout he lost...
So compared with today's movies and how most of them flop and lose money, he did't do bad... Not to mention when he died in '76 he was worth $2 billion... That's nearly $7 billion in today's dollars...
Obviously, your source for the rate of inflation is way off.
shareI'm replying in 2022 to a post from 2014, which in turn is replying to a post from 2005...
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
$3.8 million in 1930 is equivalent to $65.5 million in 2022.
And the dude from 2005 was correct with $45 million...
According to an article in a 1990 issue of "Air Classics" magazine, "Hell's Angels" had a final box office gross of about $7 million.
But Hughes wasn't done making money. He used the leftover action footage to pad out two additional features ("Cock of the Air" and "Sky Devils")--then sold the footage to other studios, who made at least a dozen movies from that stock!
[deleted]
Hughes was worth $2 billion at death, every dime of which came from the tool company. It was "the goose that laid the golden egg." He inherited it and it was run by another man. He did hire that man.
All of his other ventures lost money, usually quite big money.
" most studio films in 1930 cost between $500,000 - $1,000,000 "
Really?
You must be kidding.
Seriously......you MUST be joking.
Wait....are you intentionally being stupid?
Most movies, until the 1940s never came close to 1,000,000.
Citizen Kane cost 700,000 and Casablanca cost 900,000.
Where th hell do you get 1,000,000 on average?
Oh wait, you're saying in 1930? The year? At teh start of the Great Depression?
Are you fataly high?
Or drunk?
No, when Howard Hues reached the 500,000 mark of the film's production people were laughing at him thinking he was crazy.
Get your facts straight buddy, wait....you're not my friend, away with you.
I'm sure we'd all rather that you left. You're both wrong and obnoxious, an annoying combination.
shareNot only is maximusxxx rude, but he is also uninformed. It was not uncommon for silent and early sound films cost a million dollars or more, here are only a few examples: All Quiet on the Western Front (1.4 million), Wings (2 Million), Noah's Ark (1 Million), Ben Hur (3.9 Million), The Black Pirate (1.3 million), The Ten Commandments (1.9 Million), The Thief of Bagdad (2 Million). Foolish Wives (1.1 Million). These figures all came from IMDB, the same web site on which maximusxxx is making his comments. One can argue that the "average" motion picture did not cost more than a million dollars in those days, but films costing a million dollars or more were not rare enough to warrant such a rude rant.
shareThat is actually quite incorrect. Hughes involvement in space technology and electronic develoupments for the US Military such as radar seeking missles made him a great deal of money. His fortune was not due to only his tool company, and can be easily found out with just a little bit of research.
shareHere's the link that has the info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell%27s_Angels_%28film%29
ii:iv
He also got half a billion for selling his shares in TWA according to a History Channel special.
shareAccording to Turner Classic Movies and several other movie sites I visited it net about the same as its production costs - basically 4 million profit.
"I do not like mixing up moralities and mathematics."
Churchill
My guess would be not much because it was a mediocre film.
Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar and doesn't.