MovieChat Forums > Kamala Harris Discussion > I'm not voting for Harris. Neither shou...

I'm not voting for Harris. Neither should you.

posted 2 months ago by Phids (776)
25 replies | jump to latest

Kamala Harris has often been referred to as a "DEI candidate", meaning she landed her job as vice president on account of her identity as a non-white woman. In other words, it wasn't because of her merit that she was chosen by Biden to be his running mate. In fact, when she was running for president in 2020, she was polling at around 2% support by Democrats(!) before she dropped out.

Once in office, Harris bumbled through her time, dropping the ball on tasks given to her - most notably as the "border czar" (a title used by the media to describe her role). At other times, she has done little of note as VP, but she has been filmed dancing, or acting as a "TikTok performer".

As a politician, she has been thoroughly unimpressive. This is quite clearly revealed during unscripted interviews in which she provides excessively wordy and confusing responses to important questions.

In order to attack Trump, she has had to repeat false points. For example, she repeats the false claim that links Trump to "Project 2025", despite the fact that Trump has repeatedly disassociated himself with it. She also claimed that Trump will create a 20% national sales tax, which is not true.

I could keep going about her utter lack of demonstrated leadership, the nuts-and-bolts of her policies that are bad, or her phoniness, but I'll leave it there. I'm not voting for Kamala Harris, and neither should you.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

If anyone is interested in finding out more reasons why Kamala Harris should *not* be our next president, please take a look at the recent 60 Minutes interview with her.

[–] DarthAckbar (2076) 2 months ago

LOL!

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Don't tell me you're voting for Harris....

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

I can't wait to vote for Harris on my mail in ballot which I received on Friday.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Stop to consider that maybe she just doesn't have what it takes to be president.

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

Too late. I received my mail in ballot Friday so I've already voted for Harris and every other Democrat on that ballot. Now I just need to drop my ballot at a mailbox since return postage is paid.

Why would anybody stand in line for hours with the unwashed masses to vote when voting by mail is so much easier? Trump votes by mail, genius. Well, he used to be able to vote but Trump lost that right because he's a convicted felon.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

I encourage you to rip up your ballot and reconsider, particularly after Harris' painful interview with 60 Minutes.

[–] vader (112) 2 months ago

It's a futile exercise, you're speaking to the human equivalent of a pre-programmed bot. Their behavior is directly imbued into the prefrontal cortex via mass media insertion.

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

Signs that MAGAs are in a cult.

1. Absolute authoritarianism without accountability
2. Zero tolerance for criticism or questions
3. Lack of meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget
4. Unreasonable fears about the outside world that often involve evil conspiracies and persecutions
5. A belief that former followers are always wrong for leaving and there is never a legitimate reason for anyone else to leave
6. Abuse of members
7. Records, books, articles, or programs documenting the abuses of the leader or group
8. Followers feeling they are never able to be “good enough”
9. A belief that the leader is right at all times
10. A belief that the leader is the exclusive means of knowing “truth” or giving validation

There is still time for you to be deprogrammed from Trump's cult before it's too late.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Uh, let's dismantle #1 in your list, and let your claims all fall.

Is Trump an "absolute authoritarian"? Because it seems to me that if he was, he did a pretty horrible job at it.

After all, he couldn't finish the border wall after Congress failed to fund it. Not so "authoritarian" there.

He was investigated by the FBI, Congress, and Special Counsel(!). They didn't find he committed crimes, but the fact that those investigations went on make Trump seem like he was not an "authoritarian" there.

The media regularly published fake and misleading news about Trump. Did he shut down newsrooms across the country as a result? After all, even an "authoritarian" could so something as simple as that, but the fact that Trump is alleged to be an "absolute authoritarian", this would 100% be the case. So did Trump do it?

Nope.

Instead, he sent out mean tweets about the media.

So this idea that Trump is an "absolute authoritarian" is simply leftist doomfiction.

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

That's cute and it's fun watching you make excuses for Trump. You went on and on about the first item on this list so what about the other nine? Why aren't you making excuses for those?

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

I spilled a lot of ink just dismantling that first obviously false point on your list. Based on this, people can determine for themselves whether they find your list, as a whole, credible or not.

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

Why are you only focused on the first item on this list? Why do you ignore the rest of the items on this list? Quit acting like a retard. You are in a cult and it shows. Hurry! There is still time to be deprogrammed from this cult. Just ask for help.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Like I said, I dismantled the first point you tried to make. That's all I needed to do. I don't feel like spending time debating an entire list of claims. Others can do that if they wish.

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

You are a huge pussy! Why are you only focused on the first item on this list? Why do you ignore the rest of the items on this list? You didn't dismantled anything, Goober. All you do just make up excuses for Trump.

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Why are you repeating the same questions that I've already answered?

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Did you vote yet?

[–] robocat893 (15960) 2 months ago

I already told you I've voted so why are you asking? Read my post that you replied to. Your stupidity cannot be cured and it is fatal.

[–] itsbananas2024 (1835) 2 months ago

"most notably as the "border czar" (a title used by the media to describe her role)."

What's also notable is how the MEDIA is now flat out lying that she wasn't the "BORDER CZAR".

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

Yeah, that stuck out to me as well. The media gave her the elevated status of "border czar" when they originally reported the story, but when she failed at her job and it became a liability, they backtracked and actually said that they reported it incorrectly.

So either Kamala Harris failed as the border czar or the media published misinformation. Either way, the left has egg on its face.

[–] spraghetti (33) 2 months ago

a good video on that for anyone interested:
https://twitter.com/SirSven33/status/1816905910490714275

[–] Phids (776) 2 months ago

That pretty much hits the nail on the head. The media's credibility has been slaughtered since Trump entered politics.

[–] JoWilli (20271) 2 months ago

it would be the end of america if Kameltoe stole the election.

[–] SweetTooth43 (2054) 2 months ago

Anybody with half a frickin' brain should know not to vote for that nit wit. Unfortunately there are a lot of stupid people out there. Sigh

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12121) 2 months ago

the false claim that links Trump to "Project 2025"

Trump was smart to distance himself from P2025. But most the people he'll use to fill his cabinet and his appointees in general support it. So if he wins parts of it will make its way into law regardless. If you want Republicans in the legislature and the courts, deal with it, P2025 is now the theoretical basis of Republican policy.