Are you looking forward to more assassinations ? - Luigi Mangione Discussion

[–] acelesson (810) a month ago

I mean when you think about it we have a nation that is increasingly busting at the seams with hate and anger at a quick rate, all with access to thousands of guns.

Plus citizens of this country take it in the ass from these huge corporations daily. People are getting sick of being price gouged with no repercussions for these corps.

Long story short: I wasnt surprised when a health insurance CEO was murdered, and I definitely would not be surprised if it happened again.

reply

[–] DoctorThirteen (14658) a month ago

I'm not in the US, but when you put it like that it seems pretty likely!

reply

[–] leader (2063) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] Toomer (179) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] Porsche911 (3741) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] tvfan (13755) a month ago

That’s not going to solve the bigger problems.

That CEO was set to testify against some bigger fish (elites and politicians in congress) for corruption and other shenanigans.

That means the actual assassin provided them with an escape route while this patsy takes the fall.

And even if Luigi was the real assassin, he’s still their patsy and accomplice (directly or indirectly).

reply

[–] fc31 (5870) a month ago

That CEO was set to testify against some bigger fish (elites and politicians in congress) for corruption and other shenanigans.

Please provide a source when you say something like that.

reply

[–] tvfan (13755) a month ago

Thompson was accused of insider trading/fraud and was going to be investigated by the SEC.

In order to save his ass; he was going to testify against others before Congress.

I don’t provide links for NPCs that constantly rely on propaganda scriptures and the fake news msm, however, since you also rely on bullshit gaslighting fact checkers, you can use one to verify/confirm what I stated.

I don’t expect anything less than more dumbassery and gaslighting in your next reply:

There is indeed an ongoing case of insider trading involving Thompson, but it targets him, not Pelosi. In a lawsuit filed in a district court in Minnesota, the plaintiffs, which included the City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Fund in Florida, have accused Thompson and other executives of UnitedHealth Group of selling their shares of the company after they found out the U.S. Department of Justice had re-launched an antitrust probe into UnitedHealth Group, but before this investigation was made public:

UnitedHealth was aware of the DOJ investigation since at least October 2023.

Thompson was facing a DOJ investigation and a lawsuit.

reply

[–] fc31 (5870) a month ago

I just need you to provide a source, anything is OK, as long as it contains facts.

Even conspiracy theories need to have basis, it can't be just imaginations.

Yes, he was investigated for inside trading: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgpl2qn7l5o

And UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty, Thompson’s boss I assume, testified in congress about cyber attacks against the company: https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/unitedhealth-ceo-testifies-before-senate-on-cyber-attack-against-change-healthcare/641625

But that is all I can find.

Do you have anything on the rest of your claims?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16049) a month ago

Requests for source is like water off a ducks back to TVfan
I mean , for the love of god , just look at this pearl
"I don’t provide links for NPCs that constantly rely on propaganda scriptures and the fake news msm"

To call him a brainwashed Trumper would be a disservice to the sheer imagination and fantasy world building this guy is capable of.

reply

[–] fc31 (5870) a month ago

I think he is more of a paid troll, because he was making things up.

reply

[–] MCguy (1292) a month ago

Do you have links from a credible source for your claim? Rhetorical.

reply

[–] fc31 (5870) a month ago

Well, I think that is why all the American corporate websites took off the photos of CEOs.

They knew they had it coming.

reply

[–] Burk48917 (11440) a month ago

You're a clown.🤣🤡

reply

[–] parkerbot (9886) a month ago

Could I look forward to better healthcare coverage instead?

reply

[–] fc31 (5870) a month ago

From the treatment of this guy, I mean state cases and federal cases and death penalty, no, it is not happening.

Even CEOs are expendable, they are in the end highly paid workers, they are doing what the owners wanted.

reply

[–] Burk48917 (11440) a month ago

Lol, he's going to get ass raped for the rest of his life. He's completely mentally unstable. Most rational people don't want to be asses raped daily in prison, so I don't suspect there will be a sudden onslaught of fuckheads like this guy following suit.🤣😂

reply

[–] Porsche911 (3741) a month ago

He might learn to like it! In time he might do the rectum penetration himself.

reply

[–] darkpast (8884) a month ago

just like school shootings. just another day

reply

[–] footlegger (1465) a month ago

Yes, all evil CEOs must die.

reply

[–] Porsche911 (3741) a month ago

The world will be a better place !

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

That’s an alarming world view.

Unless we are defending our homes from night time thieves we should leave our firearms out of our disagreements.

A legitimate complaint and lawsuit can solve what hot lead cannot, we have a proper legal system.

Leave your guns at home boys, call a lawyer!

reply

[–] Porsche911 (3741) a month ago

The incident father was healthcare pirate stealing and scamming those that need medical attention the most! It was just kill.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

Murder is no solution.
Call the papers. Hire a lawyer. File a lawsuit.

Shooting an unarmed business man in the back is a cowardly and lousy way to make a point.

reply

[–] MCguy (1292) a month ago

Who determines who "evil CEOs" are? You?

Who determines the replacements for the "evil CEOs" are? You?

Do the replacement then become "evil CEOs"?

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

Certainly not.

America has a legal system for airing out grievances and seeking settlements.

Gunplay just leads to worse trouble and I’m not hoping for that. Shooting an unarmed father and husband in the back is NOT how we address complaints.

reply

[–] SemiAnimus (2781) a month ago

You may be onto something here. Had he taken a note from Jack Palance in the movie Shane and tossed a gun at his feet first, Luigi would be in a much better position now from a PR perspective.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

I’m not rooting for any kind of gunplay. We have a very extensive legal system to sort out our problems and as frustrating as it all can be a trigger is hardly ever the answer.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

I’ve been quite clear about cold blooded murder. Where was I unclear?

reply

[–] Toomer (179) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

I was not discussing that. In any event I was very clear on my disdain for murder as a means to settle disputes which a court could have worked out peacefully.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

You do not assign me homework nor do you get to derail the discussion.

Feeble attempt boy.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) a month ago

[deleted]

[–] SemiAnimus (2781) a month ago

This checked out for that CEO.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

Ambushing a defenseless man must make that list. Taking away a husband, a father, blasting away on a busy street like anyone has the right..?

Grow up, we live in a society of laws.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) 25 days ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) 25 days ago

Back-shooting is a coward’s way to deal with complaints that could be settled peacefully in a courtroom.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) 25 days ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) 25 days ago

Ask yourself, are you both pro-murder and unable to control your life?

That’s a dire outlook, good luck, I sure hope you don’t own firearms!

reply

[–] Toomer (179) 25 days ago

[deleted]

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) 25 days ago

We don’t have the right to make such calls. We have laws and a government.

Don’t be a fake tough guy. You’d be typing this from prison if you acted the way you talk.

reply

[–] Toomer (179) 25 days ago

[deleted]

[–] MCguy (1292) 25 days ago

Take the advice of strntz. These are loons.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) 25 days ago

Reason does not always work.

Hopefully these nuts are on a watchlist somewhere.

reply

[–] MCguy (1292) 25 days ago

You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

reply

[–] strntz (12735) a month ago

Honestly Sho, I wouldn't waste much time debating these loons. They are either trolling or truly deranged. I've pretty much stopped except a snipe here or there.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (78050) a month ago

As usual you give wise advice and I appreciate you.
You are no doubt correct, thanks.