Her or Megan Fox


I prefer Rachael

reply

likewise...compared to rachael megan is so overrated

You met me at a very strange time in my life-The Narrator

reply

Why not both?

reply

Oh very much so. Everyone talks about Megan Fox being the hot babe from Transformers. I barely even noticed her as anything other than a young kid in tight shorts. Now she's older but still over-rated.
Rachael Taylor was the hot babe I was paying attention to in the film. :) I think she played a far more likable character in the film too. Even the robots showed more warmth and emotion than megan.

reply

well, there's a reason why Megan became famous and Rachel not, they both had basicly the same chance after Transformers... but I'm sorry, Rachel is very pretty but compared to Megan she seems just boring.

reply

bazinga!

reply

Hmmm... I'll have to try them BOTH on for size and get back to ya! Looks alone, it's close but Megan.

reply

RE: KazKazui.... I guess you didn't know that Megan Fox was famous even before Transformers, right?..... I guess not.

Rachael is much more attractive...and of course there's that australian accent which is much more attractive than that nasty "about to die" accent of Megans... it's awful listening to her talk.


"The world moves for love, It kneels before it in awe" - The Village

reply

I think Megan is definitely better-looking than Rachael. HOWEVER, I would not say that the two had the same chance in getting popular/having more opportunities because their roles were so different in that Megan obviously had to play a sexpot and it was even written in the script for other actors to focus on her looks and sex appeal whereas Rachael was very much a specialist just doing her crucial job in resolving mysteries of the security system. It's not just about looks; a woman who flaunts her stuff in demeanor and attire, let alone have a script aimed at such, will usually get a lot more attention than a woman who doesn't even if the latter woman is equally or more attractive physically.

reply