Couldn't be sexy if sne tried
She did apparently try.
shareGain some weight, buy some boobs, and get some tattoos removed.
sharefake titties are way way worse than small boobs. feels like ur having sex with a living sex doll it is gross!
shareAgreed. Fake boobs are a turn-off.
Natural tits come in all shapes and sizes and should be embraced. If a woman has been severely short-changed and is literally flat-chested then fine, get some tits. Same goes for a woman with deformed or damaged waps.
But most boob jobs are unnecessary, unattractive once you’ve got to actually see and interact with them, and point to a vain and shallow personality.
There is no substitute for big naturals.
lolz @ the super studs here hating on her, like they would ever have a choice in the matter.
She’s a phenomenal talent, and I suspect she would graciously extend the middle finger to the sad haters while she’s currently sitting at the top of the charts, counting her money while you lot rate her out of 10 like pimply virginal fourteen year olds.
🤣 ^ spot on
She’s sexy as hell. Especially when she’s naked.
shareI was trying to be funny in my previous two posts on page one.
I just don't think she's all that sexually attractive, i mean, she's not ugly. But she blew her chance at being "sexy" when she displayed her lousy twerking skills way back when.
Not that twerking is all that sexy but some girls are actually pretty good at it. Miley isn't, and it was an embarrassing moment for her.
She also took a lot of heat for letting Robin Thicke grind on her during the grammies or whatever it was. Wasn't she still underage too? I can't remember.
She tries every fucking time she shits one of her subpar godawful "songs".
She never succeeds.
Her posing, stupidity, trashyness and utter lack of class and talent would offput a man on death row.
That's precisely the problem. She not only tried, she tried way too hard. In doing so, she became raunchy, vulgar, and honestly skanky. She's naturally good looking -- not devastatingly beautiful or anything, but genuinely attractive, at least physically (your mileage here will vary depending on tastes and preference; beauty is in the eye of the beholder). But most men would rate her as at least good looking. But like a lot of child stars it seems, who were groomed to have a wholesome, family-friendly image, she rebelled against it extra hard when she reached adulthood and tried to be "mature," by being overly provocative and scornful of what were considered decent conventions. By doing so, she overcompensated for her previous wholesome, saccharine, Hannah Montana image to the point of becoming skanky: i.e. repugnantly filthy. Squalid. Low.
And the problem with that is that because inner beauty -- in other words character -- is so much deeper than physical beauty, the sordid character she's shown couldn't be compensated for by skin-deep physical beauty, even if hers were fifty times as great as what it is.
The short version: yeah, she's good looking at least, but she's damaged goods. Badly damaged enough not even to be tempting to anyone with discriminating character.
She is not bad looking but her presentation is terrible.
share