I was expecting to hate her as some sort of racial feminist token. But she's brave and independent even if you don't like some of her views.
I expect a Justice to apply the Constitution as it is written, not according to some emotional frenzy on the part of the contemporary hoi polloi. Miss Thaaang will do that.
Really, she can't even answer basic law 101 questions w/o fucking her answers up. How about asking her how she feels being nominated only for her skin color, she sure as hell didn't get nominated on Merit.
shareOn paper, she's more qualified than literally every current Justice on the Supreme Court when they were nominated. Probably a 100 times more qualified than Amy Comey Barret.
shareReally, she can't even answer basic law 101 questions w/o fucking her answers up.
I didn't see that. Do you have an example?
How about asking her how she feels being nominated only for her skin color, she sure as hell didn't get nominated on Merit.
You could say the same thing about every white justice who's ever been on the court because their whiteness certainly played a part, did it not?
But sure, the court needs to represent the people and cannot exclude black people. So her race is part of her selection just as it has been for "whites only" for 250 years.
She's cute. I'd probably hang out with her. But her answers suggest she is not a good candidate for Supreme Court Justice.
Qualifications should be submitted in writing, without name, race, biological gender, or imaginary gender. Questioning could be done in an on-line written chat format, no video, so the candidate would remain anonymous. Nobody would know if it was a man or woman (or ?) or what his, her, or its race was.
The Republicans kept trying to crucify her on Critical Race Theory and then they tried to pull the pedo card on her -inflame redneck emotions. Seriously, they tried to trip her up and she didn't fall for it.
I went into it expecting not to like her but she handled it adeptly.