Thinks Only Biologists Know What a Woman Is
...therefore she is not qualified for the Supreme court.
share...therefore she is not qualified for the Supreme court.
shareshe is woman but doesnt know what a woman is, our society and way of life is effed...
shareEverything you're seeing that's fudged up in America has a Dem/Lib fingerprint attached directly to it.
shareTruth^^
shareThis is the real problem... people who think voting/elections make a difference.
shareIt obviously made a difference in Nov, 2016, which explains the brazen voting fraud in 2020 to 'win' the election for OBiden.
If it didn't make a difference why were the LIEberals in an uproar for 4.5 years trying to stop Trump at every turn? Why was the cost of living so livable under Trump?
as far as I know, he is the only President who was under attack since the vote in November 2016.
shareWow
shareIt isn't just America unfortunatly.
It is the same here in the UK. Politicians being asked what is a woman and they either don't answer or say and this is a quote by the way.
"A woman is a biological human female and Transwoman". That is a quote from a politician (MP) who is intrusted to lead the country.
You couldn't make it up really
So she is admitting biology is a factor in what a woman is? In clown world this is enough to be called transphobic (made up word).
Is she cancelled yet?
Politicians are so afraid of upsetting the woke mob that they give the most politically correct answer they can. Even though they know damn well what a women or man is. In the end they just end up looking like insincere idiots.
shareExcept she is not a politician and does not set a policy position from the bench.
You should be cheering her position and her experience.
Why should I be cheering?
shareIf their was no political aspect to a supreme court justice then they wouldn't be asking these questions to begin with. The sad fact is the supreme court strayed from what it was supposed to do decades ago. All they should be doing is applying the actual words of the Constitution to laws to determine if things are Constitutional. It isn't that difficult to do, and their aren't really any ambiguities. But these fuck heads on the court have agendas and will go through extreme mental gymnastics to twist things so that they get to set policies from the bench. Hell the most clear cut example is when the court has struck down capital punishment as being unconstitutional. Common sense would clearly indicate that if capital punishment is being carried out year after year that is can never be considered cruel and unusual punishment as even if you somehow think it is cruel it is still not unusual... But these shit heads that were against use mental gymnastics to twist things around and ignore reality in 1972 when they struck down capital punishment in specific cases. Hell Look at Roe v Wade, yet again they pull out some bullshit right to privacy that isn't even in the Constitution as the basis of knocking down abortion laws. These were all agenda driven rulings that should never have happened. If people are unhappy with what the Constitution allows or doesn't allow then changes need to be made through amendments not from pushing shit heads into the Supreme Court that are willing to ignore their duty to twist ruling around to give politicians what they want.
shareAre you telling me there's a fucking Senator stupid enough to be asking bullshit like that?
shareThere's a bunch of them ... for some comedy relief listen to Ted Cruz raging like a rabid poodle.
shareYou're so mad Brown's insane bias was exposed.
shareLeftists are the dumbest, most delusional people in the world. This woman couldn't answer the simplest of all questions and all the leftards here are trying to make it seem like the person who asked the question is at fault. Anything to deflect from the truth.
Ask this question in 99% of the countries outside of the US, UK, Australia and NZ and you'll be laughed at for asking what even 2 year olds know.
Conservatives are so good at pretending to be dumb, but it's a shame they forgot how to stop pretending.
shareThat's what I was thinking because they never asked that before. I know someone who is in her 50's now and she was born intersex, she is a woman despite having XY chromosomes. She can't get pregnant but has always been a female, even though it's obvious a lot of people on here wouldn't consider her to be an actual woman.
shareThinks right-wing nuts ever tell the truth, therefore not qualified for posting on the Internet.
shareShe has to lie. Of course she knows what a woman is, but if she says what she knows she'll be rejected by the left. So she just sidesteps by saying she's not a biologist. To rational people, her answer is absurd, but it's not the judgement of rational people she depends on to get the job.
shareGreat post
share