I’m hoping he gets Jared Taylor on his show
Jared should be a regular contributing guest. A lot of people would get red pilled as a result.
shareWhite identatarians really dropped the ball with the opportunity they had to insert themselves into the mainstream right a few years ago with the Trump/Alt Right phenomena. They shouldn't have done those retard rallies in Charlottesville. That's what killed them. Instead they should have done their best to open dialogue with the mainstream right and try to push pull them to their side. People who are ideologically in between like Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson and Douglas Murray - the so called Alt-lite would be a good example how to do it.
sharePJW and Douglas Murray aren't White nationalists. They're homosexual libertarian libertines.
Molyneux is an even more extreme form of libertarian. He's an An-Cap who hates minorities because they vote for the Democrats. He praises places like Poland because they're economically Right-wing but he might as well go live in Singapore.
All of them are useless grifters who have no real influence on the GOP.
The GOP has no interest in pursuing actual White nationalist policies. They have and will continue to bait voters based on identity angst and grievances but that's just to win extra votes.
The only reason why Trump was sent to become president was to defuse the whole issue; to be an absolute failure and such an outrageous fraud that he would demoralize all sane individuals who might've once had hope for America. There was never an opportunity with Trump for anything whatsoever because he was always a controlled opposition.
One does not have to be a literal White nationalist to be a White advocate. The latter is what's important. They are pro White. Murray said Europe belongs to Europeans. That is White nationalist rhetoric nowadays. That's good enough for me. PJW is as based when it comes to multiculturalism as it gets. It's a miracle the still let him keep his YoutTube channel. Also I forgot to mention Vince James and RamzPaul and even Ann Coulter.
I'm talking about more mainstream conservative pundits who want to preserve American values like limited government, gun rights and ideology. It's not difficult to show these people that these values are going to be gone if non White immigration continues. That's what should have been drilled into them until they accept we have a point and if they don't after we reached out to them with dialogue, then they will expose themselves. We have to realize we are a small marginalized community and if we want any hope we have to build coalitions. The worst thing to do is to make the mainstream right alienate us.
Whatever you think about Ben Shapiro the fact is he has a much bigger influence than anyone in the Alt Right and people like him should have been invited to dialogue by the Alt Right instead of picking fights with him. Fuentes harassing him in public didn't do anything but giving him an excuse to ignore and counter signal us. Now he might have counter signaled us anyways, but if he did that after a respectful outreach, his followers would see that and perhaps become more sympathetic to us. That would have been a strategic thing to do.
If Murray really believed that Europe belongs to the Europeans, why would he support the Conservative Party, the party that sends the greatest amount of immigrants to Britain than any other party? We're seeing the same scam as the Republicans are running in the US on large sections of their electorate. The Rothschild/Sassoon Conservative Party has no sympathies for the "native" British nations. Just the opposite, in actuality.
We see Murray writing here for various rags like the Telegraph that belongs to the Barclay barons who are world famous for tax evasion. That which has become a national sport in Britain, tax evasion. Ah yes, these sociopathic snobs; highly reclusive but there are some lovely pictures of them. They surely care so much about Britain that they don't even want to pay taxes to its people.
And then there's the obvious reason why Murray and PJW hate Muslims.
At this point, a Caliphate might actually be preferable. But I fear the future will be worse.
I agree that the aforementioned group of "influencers" aren't directly Anti-White in their rhetoric; which in the eyes of many is enough to kind of grasp a straw of hope. But in the long run many of their followers will become disillusioned, they'll grow up, they'll see through the con, they'll see through the useless grift.
Or maybe they won't. Maybe I'm underestimating the stupidity and the evil of the masses. These entertainers will
continue to "Trigger the Libs"; these merchants of sadism, wasn't Ben Shapiro the one who began selling "Liberal tears" mugs from early on? That's pretty much all they're going to give you and in exchange they'll take away everything you believe in.
That's an interesting question, why do they still allow PJW on YouTube? One consideration worth mentioning is that YouTube is extra careful when it comes to removing channels with large numbers of subscribers like Crowder and PJW because they're afraid they'll lose many viewers to rival platforms... (tbc)
I don't know why Murray supports the Conservatives, perhaps because they are still slightly better than the Labour and there are absolutely no viable alternatives. There isn't any party to the right of Conservatives who would be against immigration that has any chance. Perhaps Farrage, too bad UKIP collapsed after Brexit, I don't know weather or not Murray supports Farrage. Parties like For Britain and Patriotic Alternative are too small and carry too much of a stigma. If he was to endorse one of them, he and all his reputation would be out the window and all his arguments along with him.
In any case Murray wrote a book called Strange Death of Europe in which he presents all the arguments why immigration into Europe is a bad thing and that's good enough for me.
Of course I disagree with Murray on a lot of issues, but you don't have to agree with someone on everything in order to see him as a force for good. The same applies to others I mentioned. Ann Coulter for example thinks that Whites owe Black people, which I strongly disagree with and she of course won't touch race and genetics, but at this point even the cultural arguments go in our favour. Hell, even Thomas Sowell's ideas are better than the leftist orthodoxy.
Well, I haven't seen much from Douglas Murray apart from the odd video here and a podcast there. But when I browse through the latest articles he's writing in relation to the Conservatives, I find him outraging about the Conservatives taking too much action against Climate Change (or at least saying they would) and not enough to deal with public debt. Right-wing economic issues that are dear to the stony hearts of his tax evading Barcley Brother Billionaire Barons. Murray is like a British Milo, he'll prostitute his services to the billionaire class, it's not hard to see; setting up traps for the unsuspecting masses that lead them to vote for the same people who are killing Europe.
Saying that there are no viable alternatives in a 2-Party state is like saying there is no Democracy. People might as well come out and start saying it. At least the illusion that's keeping people in chains might finally be broken.
Hey, big things have small beginnings. Rome wasn't built in a day. People have to rally around a new party and leadership and establish an ideologically pure movement that's directly accountable to the people, not to a small clique of donors and manipulators. It's been done in various places in Europe; just as an example, Sweden Democrats, and the various Nationalist factions in France were tiny just a couple of decades ago but are now major players, even contenders for primacy. It's amazing, French nationalist candidates supporters are now up to 38% of the population in the latest poll I've seen.
In all honesty, I don't trust Farrage; he was sent in to destroy the opposition; I don't know if he's even relevant now, and I don't see a way of turning things around either in the UK or in America. There's no promising leadership emerging in either country. It's over.
It's not like it was a bad soil but it's been salted too much to the point that nothing can grow out of it.
You really seem black pilled.
shareI remember Molyneux had less than 1 million subs when they booted him while PJW is now approaching 2 million.
This is interesting though, according to SocialBlade analysis PJW's channel has significantly slowed its accumulation of subscribers and views in the last few years. In contrast, Ben Shapiro has seen a scyrocket increase of his subs and views over the last few years. This might have something to do with the now famous and infamous YouTube algorithms that select what political content gets popular and what doesn't.
Nonetheless, why YouTube has chosen to keep PJW; I think he summed it up well in one of his videos, it was from these recent years, where he covered a number of society's ailments but also asked the rare question of "What is the solution?" to our problems and he gave the answer that "there is no solution". Well, I'm not Anti-PJW posting here because we can't expect everyone to have all the answers, even a former janitor like himself.
So I think his role is to be kept as a dead-end, "limited hangout" and it's even more sinister because people are given hope and they see this rebel swinging fists over there but the algorithms makes sure that it stagnates and doesn't grow.
Thus, nothing gets accomplished. For me personally, the less is said about how Sargon "that rape guy" of Akkad destroyed UKIP, the better. It's just nauseating at this point.
Oh yeah, I love Ann Coulter ever since she said she'll personally perform abortions inside of the White House if Trump builds a wall. I've been a fan 100% ever since.
I don't think that ordinary people, the commoners, have much power and say over government policy. Public opinion isn't unimportant but it's also manufactured to a huge extent. Kind of like Chomsky's idea of the Manufacture of Consent.
I don't think America is a Democracy; it's arguable that maybe there exist some Democracies in Europe. France certainly appears to be much more open to debate, original ideas, discussions, human agency, reason.
So to finish up on this section, I may have my own thoughts on whether the people should take back control of their government and what does that even mean; I may have my own opinions on gun control, and other ideologies.
That ultimately doesn't matter.
OK, moving on. Well, I think the Republican Party has overwhelmingly and irreversibly decided that its focus on growth is going to consist of winning minority voters. All that Steve Bannon ever talks about on his War Room podcast is winning over the Rio Grande Hispanic voters (by the way, the real reason why they went Trump in 2020 was because they work for the Oil industry over there but Bannon deliberately misrepresents the facts) and building an Afro-American coalition that's going to run the country for the next 100 years.
Now they say that they won the majority of Hispanics in the Virginia governor race. Some claim 54%.
While it is true that the area of Virginia close to DC is home to exceptionally wealthy immigrants from around the world and wealthy individuals are more likely to vote Right-wing; I think this is going to further embolden the GOP strategists and supporters in the Media that this is the right strategy and approach.
Besides, they love immigration. Even the elder Murdoch was at a conference and supported the need for more immigration to America. The big corporations and even so many small business owners love the influx of cheap labour, both legal and illegal. This is their preferred modus operandi for as long as they can keep getting away with it. And for the present and foreseeable future, this is going to be the future of America. At least until technological automation of jobs changes the direction of their greed.
So, is the GOP going to remain a competitive party in the foreseeable future? They won in Virginia, Trump is polling tied to Biden. They seem to be stuck with African-Americans at very low percentage of support, even among wealthier African-Americans... (tbc)
The GOP seem to be stuck with African-Americans at very low percentage of support, even among wealthier African-Americans duo to various Media influences, cultural, historical, education system ideologies, and so many factors.
They see a fertile ground of voters waiting to be exploited among Black business owners and wealthier individuals. Even Trump saw this opportunity and invested government money in Black businesses and minority "development zones".
I saw recently even a figure such as Alex Jones was airing clips of poor old Colin Kaepernick's latest video; I didn't unmute the stream but I can guess that he was talking about how America isn't racist and therefore Blacks should vote for the GOP.
So far they haven't been successful with African-Americans. On the other hand, it seems that there is a real growth with the Hispanic community; Trump did better with them in 2020 than he did in his first run. The Virginia race now.
There are divisions to be exploited among Latin Americans; they have their own significant racial divisions.
Is Texas going to turn Blue? Next elections are going to be exciting.
But in any case, it seems to me that the Republican Party is simply going to have to move a bit more to the Center in the near future. Sort of in a way of the Right-wing parties in Western Europe; building compromises to stay relevant.
This current form of far-fetched libertarianism of Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kirk, the Koch brothers, even as they're throwing all the money in the world to promote those views;
I think the momentum is against them and the enormous, infuriating, social inequalities, personal debts, health crisis, perceived and real discriminations; these grievances are going to find an answer and it's definitely not going to be the small government Republicans. This is where Biden was sent to enact a controlled New Deal that attempts to satiate grievances while serving Corporate interests at the same time.
Speaking of reaching out, forming coalitions, influencing the GOP; didn't Nick Fuentes and Vince James attempt to do that? I haven't followed their videos but that's an impression that has variously been presented.
Some say Nick Fuentes destroyed himself with cookie monster jokes and they may be right. Others believe he destroyed himself on January 6th. The consensus is that he's destroyed.
Vince James also appears to have been scrapped from YouTube.
They're irrelevant. "Goobers", as Bannon used to call them.
Ben Shapiro despises "identity politics" and I don't think there's any chance he would be convinced. These aren't some helpless children that just need to have their eyes open and suddenly they'll see and support you. They also have millions of dollars thrown at them from billionaires and financial influencers to keep a certain ideological and Party line. Just as an example, take a look at the Wilks brothers - major funders of conservative causes, including The Daily Wire, Prager University, and Senator Ted Cruz. Also, notice how Ted Cruz was the first choice for president among precisely such famous influencers.
By the way, not only are they into fracking, but you can read about how the Wilks brothers run their own "Assembly of Yahweh". Their parents being expelled from a Church, their newly founded "church" is not Christian, believing that Yahweh is the only god. It teaches that "the true religion is Jewish (not a Gentile religion)"
Very interesting stuff. Basically, and briefly as I see it, the Super Wilks Bros and their parents hated the Universal prosperity for all people of 1950s New Deal Christian America and decided to join the Jews and to become a sort of Jews themselves in a tiny coalition of exclusivity and aganist collective humanity. In other words, they turned to the Dark Side of the Force and took part in funding its destruction of America.
An old bane of humanity, seeing yourself as a superior being, a Nazi, despising universal egalitarianism.