MovieChat Forums > Benedict Cumberbatch Discussion > Excellent, lengthy article about Season ...

Excellent, lengthy article about Season Five on Digital Spy


While nothing is stated as set in concrete and rebar, this is a far more measured article than what sparked the adolescent (whatever their ages) meltdown at the places of abbreviated speech. Some nice pictures included, info about possible stories, upbeat Mofftiss, etc.

Is this a Holmes Heaven alternative? Enjoy!

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/sherlock/feature/a819122/sherlock-season-5-air-date-cast-episodes-news-and-everything-you-need-to-know/





A Checkered Life speaks of myriad diverse adventures being the rewards of endless curiosity.

reply

Thanks Checkered.

I especially loved reading the long list of untapped Holmes stories. Brought back a lot of exciting memories of reading all of those stories when I was a "sprout"!

:-))

"You're going into the water... short-arse!"
- Sherlock

reply

Here's another summing up of the final episode that helps explain a lot of things that some of the more confused fans out there might have overlooked.

http://screenrant.com/sherlock-the-final-problem-season-4-ending-explained-eurus/

:-))

"You're going into the water... short-arse!"
- Sherlock

reply

Thanks for that- interesting article!

reply

Excellent, article, RoverPup!! Thank you for posting the link.

I have felt extremely sad about the vitriol from people who obviously thought that their Johnlock desires would occur if they could bully the Sherlock creators into providing the often stated impossible dream. Plus, separately from the first issue, I cannot comprehend the motives of so many people watching television as umpires, looking for errors rather than enjoyment.

In the first episode as Piccadilly Circus's night appearance opened, the credits arrived, and the music was rooting itself in my heart and mind, I accepted that imaginary world of present day Holmes with complete joy. To be given living time with my favorite detective (from among the many hundreds I have read or seen) has been such an unexpected gift that I can only say "Thank You. If you return, I want to be among the grateful to greet you."

Steve's and Mark's passion for all things Conan Doyle was an unsought, unexpected blessing that occurred accidentally and was shared during their long train trips from London to Cardiff. Over the years of gaining substance and fruition with the embodiment of Sherlock it was not only serendipity; it was a miracle in timing.

What if they had never worked together? For one thing, none of us would have known what we would be missing because you evidently cannot miss what never occurred, There would be no loss because there had never been a gain. All of the acidic criticism of each brilliant episode would be gone, as would be the pleasure of every brand new take unfolding for us about ACD's famous stories.

Since the series first aired seven years ago, I have watched with completely suspended reality, yet with gratitude, pleasure, tension, wonder, and amazement at the creation displayed for our enjoyment. I have had no needed to be a critic seeking negatives since every Sherlock episode have been more than the sum of it parts and better than any other mystery that year. The acting alone made Ben and Martin into internationally recognized and sought actors beyond most of their peers. The writing has always been so clever that I have seldom noticed or cared about an inconsequential plot hole.

Why, when all of us have been given one of the rarest gifts in television history, do so many seek fault in the ninety minutes? Most of each hour and a half is more brilliant than we will see anyplace on a screen.

I had no expectation of Sherlock because I found the show by accident, so its extraordinary qualities have become a treasure. I remember what there was before Steven and Mark shared their incandescent passion for Holmes with the rest of us. Nothing like there has been since , , , , so many clips of these iconic episodes can play completely if a scene comes to mind because they feel engraved there.

None of this is to say that I have thought each episode has been perfect, but that I didn't care because it has always been better than any other mystery I've ever seen,




A Checkered Life speaks of myriad diverse adventures being the rewards of endless curiosity.

reply

,, to everything in your post Checkered.

That is exactly how I feel when I watch the show. I have said it before and I will say it again - I approach this show with 1)Trust (in the writers, actors and all of the team that brings it to me) 2) Respect (for all their efforts, talent and dedication over the many years and finally 3) Enjoyment (I always gravitate towards the positive in life, so I look to be entertained by the programming I am watching as well as enlightened into the humanity of the given situation).

And Sherlock has allowed me to indulge in all three things in copious amounts.

I was a fan of Cumberbatch before I saw him in Sherlock (I saw a number of his movies before seeking out M&G's version of the show) but have loved ACD since childhood so am very familiar with the character of Sherlock Holmes.

When I did start watching the show I was first struck by the fact that despite it being out of its original time period, and despite BC looking nothing like the classic Paget drawings, I instantly felt I had finally found a human form for the Sherlock of my imagination from when I had read those stories from so long ago. His looks didn't matter, the time frame didn't matter - BC's character held the essence of what was at the heart of all the ACD stories about the great detective... a remarkable friendship that took hold and flourished in spite of all their surface differences.

And, thanks to the brilliance of M&G's writing and stewardship over the 13 "episodes", this feeling has never left me or the show. Each set of new programmes has always been made with this end in mind.

Everything else is extra as far as I am concerned. So a few plot holes never have bothered me - ACD had plot holes too but it doesn't diminish for one second the complete artistry of his work.

And if at times I seem a bit too reverent about the writers of this show, it comes from a personal place to be sure. My husband is a writer and I know personally how difficult it is to take words and make them do what you want them to do in an interesting manner. It takes a huge amount of dedication, blood, sweat and tears on every page to come up with the barest of manuscripts. To do it professionally over many years is absolutely an accomplishment beyond most people for sure. So it truly irks me when I see folks who have a difficult time stringing six words together on the internet claim that they could do "better than the garbage that M&G have come up with". They don't have a clue what it takes!

So I will continue to be amazed at what the series was from every conceivable aspect and never stop marveling at what a great, beautiful ride it has been from start to finish.

Glad you are along for the ride as well Checkered!

:-))



"You're going into the water... short-arse!"
- Sherlock

reply

I will continue to be amazed at what the series was from every conceivable aspect and never stop marveling at what a great, beautiful ride it has been from start to finish.
Me too.

I have always felt that the show was made especially for me. Somehow, M&G knew what I wanted before I even knew, so anything they've chosen to do wth it has been absolutely fine with me. I have no complaints or criticisms about anything they've done in 13 episodes of Sherlock, because the show has brought me nothing but joy. And there's the added bonus of discovering Benedict through Sherlock - a wonderful actor and a wonderful human being.

As soon as my blu-rays of S4 arrive, I'm going to re-watch the episodes until I know them as well as I know S1-S3, i.e. I'll be able to say the dialogue along with (or even before) the actors onscreen - and usually while imitating their voice! That should take a while. I can't wait!

reply

There is a Holmes fan who comments on every episode of Sherlock on the Onion AV Club review, listing all the canon references. These are their notes for this week:

Nebuly • a day ago
Notes on ‘The Final Problem’; mostly canonical, but with a couple of Sherlock references as well. I almost certainly didn’t catch everything, so please add away if you noticed something I didn’t.

The home movie and flashbacks show Mycroft as a portly child, which is in keeping
with his ‘obese’ appearance in the canon.

As has been noted, the ‘east wind coming’ reference is from ‘His Last Bow’ (1917),
where Holmes is talking about the approach of World War I.

The fact that Mycroft is seven years older than Sherlock is established in ‘The
Greek Interpreter’.

The name of the Holmes ancestral home—Musgrave—is from ‘The Musgrave Ritual’, where it is the home of Reginald Musgrave, a man with whom Holmes had had a slight acquaintance in university. Later on Euros calls it the site of Holmes’s very first case, which in the show is a reference to Redbeard/Victor Trevor. Canonically, ‘The Gloria Scott’ (which involves Victor Trevor) was Holmes’s first case, as it took place while Holmes was still in university; ‘The Musgrave Ritual’ is Holmes’s third professional case after becoming a consulting detective. Mycroft’s comment about the house—where there was always honey for tea—is a reference to Rupert Brooke’s 1912 poem ‘The Old Vicarage, Grantchester’, with its famous closing lines ‘Stands the Church clock at ten to three? / And is there honey still for tea?’

Euros’s song holds the clue to Redbeard/Victor’s disappearance: all I could make out was ‘deep down below the old beech tree, 16 by 6’ (I understand the BBC
subtitled the song; does anyone have a transcription?), which is a conflation of elements from two different Musgrave rituals. The ritual in the canonical story goes thus:
'Whose was it?' 'His who is gone.'
'Who shall have it?' 'He who will come.'
'Where was the sun?' 'Over the oak.'
'Where was the shadow?' 'Under the elm.'
‘How was it stepped?' 'North by ten and by ten, east by five and by five, south by two and by two, west by one and by one, and so under.'
'What shall we give for it?' 'All that is ours.'
'Why should we give it?' 'For the sake of the trust.'
So the tree and the 16 by 6 reference come (sort of) from that ritual, while ‘deep down below’ comes from the 1943 film Sherlock Holmes Faces Death starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, which is loosely based on ‘The Musgrave Ritual’. The ritual in the film is completely different from that of the story, and ends with the words ‘Where shall he go? / Deep down below / Away from the thunder / Let him dig under’.

Sherrinford Island is a reference to Sherrinford, the original given name Conan Doyle gave Sherlock in the draft version of A Study in Scarlet.

In ‘The Cardboard Box’ we learn that Holmes’s violin is a Stradivarius worth 500
guineas (£525) that Holmes purchased for 55 shillings (two pounds and 15 shillings) from a dealer in the Tottenham Court Road.

‘The Vatican Cameos’ is an unrecorded case mentioned in The Hound of the
Baskervilles. It’s also a warning used between Holmes and Watson in ‘A Scandal in Belgravia’.

Moriarty’s brother was a station-master: in The Valley of Fear we learn that one of Moriarty’s two brothers (who were both also named James, apparently) was a station-master in the west of England.

Nathan Garrideb is an eccentric antiquarian in ‘The Three Garridebs’, who never leaves his flat on Little Ryder Street. Unbeknownst to him, a criminal named Killer Evans had had the flat before him, and hid a counterfeiting machine in it. In order to lure Nathan out, Evans tells him that his name is John Garrideb, and that an eccentric American named Alexander Garrideb has willed his substantial fortune—$15 million—to three men with his strange surname, if they can be found. Evans eventually tells Nathan he has found a third Garrideb—Howard—and sends Nathan off to get him, so that Evans can ransack Garrideb’s flat and retrieve his machine.

The deductions about the Garridebs, with Sherlock and Mycroft trading deductions, are similar to a scene in ‘The Greek Interpreter’, where the brothers make deductions about a half-pay officer they see in the street.

Static on some of the screens within Sherrinford looks like a waterfall (‘The Reichenbach Falls’, where Holmes met his death in the canonical ‘Final Problem’).

Victor Trevor—Redbeard—was a university friend of Holmes’s. During a visit to Trevor’s house, Holmes solves his first case (‘The Gloria Scott’).

At the end, when the policeman with Lestrade says of Sherlock ‘He’s a great man,’ Lestrade replies ‘Better than that; he’s a good one.’ At the end of the first episode of Sherlock, ‘A Study in Pink’, Lestrade says of Sherlock ‘He’s a great man. Some day he might be a good one.’

Mary’s ‘final court of appeal’ is what Holmes calls himself in A Study in Scarlet.

The stick-men figures on the chalkboard are from ‘The Dancing Men’.

Mary describes Sherlock and John as ‘Two men sitting in a scruffy flat, like they’ve always been there and always will.’ Sherlockian scholar Vincent Starrett wrote a
much-loved (by Sherlockians) sonnet called ‘221B’, which begins ‘Here dwell together still two men of note / Who never lived and so can never die.’

Mary calls Sherlock and John ‘the best and wisest men I have ever known.’ Watson describes Holmes thusly at the end of the canonical ‘The Final Problem’.

If this is indeed the last episode of Sherlock, it’s been fun doing these, and I hope people enjoyed them.

Beryl Stapleton, BSI

http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/frustrating-brilliant-sherlock-stays-frustrating-r-248468

Arthur, put the kettle on and dig out those lemon hand wipes.

reply

This was the article I read yesterday and mentioned in the other thread about a possible season 5. I like they've got ideas to adapt these other Sherlock cases and I hope they are able to do it. It'll probably be a few years but there's still hope for more.

reply