Funny you should ask, Ellen. I just read an article in Radio Times that answered some of your questions: If there is to be a series five – and it appears that all parties are keen to make that happen at some point in the future – then it will be from this starting point, according to the writers, who have indicated that Benedict Cumberbatch’s Holmes has now discovered the humanity that it is at the heart of the detective’s brilliance.
Gatiss explained: “Our original intention of the series was to go back to the beginning and see them as younger men and… restore it to its factory settings. But I think what’s actually happened is that we have now done the story of how the Sherlock Homes and Doctor Watson that we have always known, how they became those men. It’s actually really a backstory.
“The reason we [ended with] Rathbone Place is that, actually, if we do come back – and we would love to come back – we could absolutely very easily start with a knock at the door and Sherlock saying to John 'Do you want to come out and play?'. They have become the two heroes that we always knew them to be."
Moffat added: “I suppose it’s that Sherlock now finally understands that’s he’s stronger and smarter than Mycroft in a way. But not because he is actually smarter – he’s less smart – but because his emotions, his connections to other human beings, the wisdom he has gained from his connections he has made in the world, make him stronger.
"He sees that, partly because the extreme of [his sister] Eurus who has no connection to anything, is just pure brain, not understanding anything about what it is to be human. [This] makes him realise everything he has worked towards, everything he has tried to get away from himself and deny about himself, is what makes him the strongest.
“He isn’t as smart as Eurus, he isn’t as smart as Mycroft but he is always going to win against them because he is better and stronger. That is him becoming the Sherlock Holmes of Basil Rathbone and [fellow Holmes actor] Jeremy Brett, the one we’re used to, the wise old man… who is still terrifying and still cold but has a heart that you never doubt."
As to whether there will be a fifth series, Moffat added: “If this was the last time – we’re not planning it, but it might be, it’s possible – we could end it there. We couldn’t have ended it on any of the previous series because they always ended up with whopping great cliffhangers."
He said a fifth series would see Sherlock and John – no surprises here – "solving crimes".
Moffat also revealed to RadioTimes.com that he and Gatiss toyed with the idea of flashing the line “The Beginning” across the screen at the end of The Final Problem.
But while it accords with the theme of the episode, he said that in the end they decided it would have been “too cheesy”. http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2017-01-17/mark-gatiss-and-steven-moffat-reveal-where-sherlock-could-go-in-series-5
I just got home late last night from London. (Took me 8.5hrs to get back.) I watched the episode when I got in when I was very tired, and I'm still processing. First impression: Loved it! Off top of my head, I'd say:
Could we handle a warmer, gentler Sherlock? Absolutely! The cold, 'sociopath' detective isn't an accurate reflection of the character in Conan Doyle. Mofftiss have simply now brought him into line with the original creation. He's never going to be warm and fuzzy (dangling babies on his knee in the final scenes notwithstanding), but he is much more compassionate. Doesn't mean he won't still have some walls up, or prioritise his work over romance.
I shuddered to think of them going down the JohnLock route. Everyone connected with the series has denied that option for years. Benedict, Martin, Steven, Mark and others have repeatedly said it wouldn't happen. Only wooly-headed, self-deluded, and 'entitled' fans insisted it must be so because they wanted it. One wishes the little darlings would just hold their collective breath until they turned blue. Foot stamping might be an option, too. I'd suggest they could do both at once, but I doubt multi-tasking is something many could do.
I deliberately avoided all social media until I'd seen the episode and I was shocked to see such a negative reaction all over the 'net. In all honesty, I think the issue is far less to do with the show or the writers, but more with this 'Christmas tree' mentality some people have. They see the show as something upon which to dangle the pet theories or hobby-horses of their choice. If that particular ornament isn't on their tree, they'll burn the tree. Shame on people for their appalling behaviour. Death threats and demands for the creatives commit suicide because the little darlings didn't get their way? Unconscionable.
https://rycardus.wordpress.com/2016/11/02/sherlock-and-the-sorcerer/
reply
share