After all, blubbermouse got off scottfree despite the letter of the law being explicitly clear that it’s not self defense if you didn’t need to be there or could’ve ran away.
Rittenhouse was running away, you f'ing moron. He shot in self-defense, at criminals who were attempting to kill him. Mangione, in great contrast, waited until his intended victim, who was no threat to him, walked into view, then shot the guy in the back. It's astounding that you are so stupid you can't comprehend the vast difference.
Rittenhouse was running away like a bitch after pointing his rifle at bystanders you f'ing moron. He shot a guy that threw a plastic bag after being provoked by aiming his gun at them.
Mangione, in great contrast, waited until the mass murderer CEO, who was a threat to millions of people walked into view, then dispensed social justice.
Yeah that's not what happened. The mob was trying to start a dumpster fire and burn down the entire business. Kyle put out the fire with a fire extinguisher. The criminals were so mad, they chose to attack Kyle instead. Joseph Rosenbaum threw his bag with all of his belongings at Kyle, since he had just be released from the mental hospital that day, and he charged at Kyle and said I'm going to kill you. He was shot, and nothing of value was lost.
Wrong, he was aiming his gun at people on the street and goaded them into reacting. What a cowardly lil bitch he is. Not self defense. By your logic you can walk around aiming your gun at bystanders and then claim self defense? Coward, micro-dick republitarded logic
That’s also false, his father lived in Kenosha. The narrative that his mom dropped him at the protest, and he brought a weapon crossed state lines is a flat out lie, repeated by the msm.
And no he’s not a hero, but he should’ve never been charged in the first place.
That’s false, I just told you what happened. They weren’t just minding their own business, and he walked up to them and pointed a gun. They were on the lot causing chaos, and attacked him when he put out the fire. It’s in video.
lol what a horribly wrong interpretation of distorted events you have. There’s video evidence of him pointing his gun at people who never even approached him. Succ iiittt!
You can explain it to these people over a hundred times and they still won't listen. They'll just cover their ears & scream and continue living in their own delusions. You got a better chance with a bricked wall than an unhinged leftist.
Republitards are the biggest intellectual cowards in the world! Basic facts apparently don’t register in your peanut brains, so you have to hide on the internet behind a keyboard! 🤣 🤡
You Libtards are the ultimate cowards, you abuse women & groom children and then have the audacity to accuse the otherside of lacking humanity when you people have none to begin with and this is coming from someone that isn't part of any political party but you people assume anything that thinks you're insane is a republican and you wonder why Trump won. "Fact" doesn't go with anything you lefties say, you people don't even know what a woman is.
If you know NY law on murder, why this mystery tap dance? People here are saying he is guilty of intentional premeditated murder and you seem to argue he’s not charged with that. You tell us to read NY law instead of just explaining your point. Has he not been charged with an intentional premeditated murder in NY?
It gives the impression you’re only arguing bar exam technicalities about the degrees of murder crimes under NY law to avoid admitting this guy has been charged with intentional, premeditated murder
You are the one I educated, I know a shitload more than you.
You are the one shouting "I'm not a leftist, I'm a libertarian" you inbred moron. Like that means anything to the left-right dichotomy. Exactly, you retard, it DOESN'T.
The only left right dichotomy is the one inside your schizoid brain, sheep. Keep having a meltdown about the fact I’m libertarian. And seek a mental crisis counselor for your random outbursts
Are you illiterate? I said he wasn’t charged with first degree murder. What part of that is wrong? You’re the people doing the tap dance in order to not admit Rottenmouse couldn’t claim self defense according to the letter of the law.
Left wingers have got to be the most dumbest people on the planet, it's amazing how stupid they are. If the CEO was a racist child molester looking for a trouble, you'd want Mangione to get a death penalty because you lefties admire people like that.
Some guy threatened me at a 7-11 but I had to run away because I was only buying lotto tickets that I really didn’t need. The problem is he was a track star like Usain Bolt and everywhere I ran, he chased me down. Each successive confrontation occurred at a place I didn’t need to be and when I could run away. So, I am still running away to this day because I remembered the MovieChat definition of self defense by AnthonySocksss
Apparently you’re too retarded to understand the letter of the law that Rottenfaget wasn’t “running away” but in fact was standing his ground and also didn’t need to be there with a gun in the first place, retarded faget 😆🤡
Your bullshit doesn’t hold up when it’s all on camera. And if you are going to reference the law, he was found not guilty in a court of law.
He also had just as much right to be there as anyone else. Protesting is protected by the first amendment, and the right to bear arms by the second. He wasn’t the aggressor in anything, which is why he was found not guilty
Wrong faget, he was aiming his gun at bystanders, the letter of the law explicitly says it doesn’t count as self defense. Doesn’t change any of those facts, lol