What's the point of having a gun if you can't save your own life with it?
?
shareThe point of having s gun is to kill. So yes, terrorist Vile Rittenlouse should spend a lifetime in a cage with Dylan Rooff and Nicholas Cruz. But also the gun manufacturers, the NRA, and all their supporters should be jailed for complicity.
share^^
share^^^
The point of a gun is to defend yourself against scum like BLM who are trying to kill you. He was a law abiding citizen who utilized his second amendment rights and his right to self defense. When this is over you and your cult need to be arrested and sued for slander and character defamation. Your president called him a "white supremacist" with no evidence whatsoever and he is responsible for any riot or insurrection that happens as a result, the motherfucker should immediately be impeached and prosecuted.
share"Your president called him a "white supremacist" with no evidence whatsoever and he is responsible for any riot or insurrection that happens as a result, the motherfucker should immediately be impeached and prosecuted."
I won't tell you where, I'll let you try to figure it out for yourself, but this sentence needed a semi colon.
I’m glad that you agree that your president is an insurrectionist.
shareHaven't figured it out yet, huh? You better get off hooked on meth & get hooked on phonics.
shareYour concession remains noted and your deflections are dismissed.
Also there was no point in saying “hooked on meth”, to tell me to “get off hooked on meth” is redundant not to mention illogical, your sentence should have read: “You better get off of meth.”
It was a form of alliteration.
There is no point in 99% of the stuff you type, but you do it anyway.
(And actually, 99% is giving you credit for 1% which you don't really deserve.)
You need to get off of the hooked on being a pathetic libtard cultist, and persue a pathway back to reality.
shareHa ha! You really ARE struggling now!
(You could have ditched the comma on that last one. I can also explain that rule to you. But only if you want me to.)
Suck on that ruling, Rittenhouse was found “not guilty” on all charges. They should sue the shit out of Biden for slander.
shareAs long as your "embarrassment is being impeached and prosecuted."
shareGood I’m glad I’m getting through to you on what an evil motherfucker Biden is.
shareIt is how "your embarrassment is being impeached & prosecuted" that I am curious about.
shareI hope the son of a bitch is kicked out of office. The Rittenhouse family should sue the shit out of him as well. Your cult leader is going down, you'd better prepare for it.
shareThe Rottenhouse family will run out of money before the end of 2022. They won't sue anybody as they have no case.
shareThe president lied about him by calling him a “white supremacist”, that is the very definition of slander. If I were a judge I would award the Rittenhouse family the entirety of Joe Biden’s assets and then throw the miserable fuck in federal prison.
shareThere are many reasons that you are not a judge, first and foremost would be your inability to successfully complete a pre-law course. The best bet the Rottenhouse clan has, is to keep a high profile utilizing platforms such as the one Fucker Carlson will provide for them. They may be able to con right wing suckers (like you) into donating to their Go Fund Me account for a couple of years that way. But that will only last so long.
shareI see you can’t defend your motherfucker of a president. I accept your concession.
shareIf Fat Donnie could not be sued for slanderous speech related to all the lies & insults he levied, it is safe to say that President Biden will not be sued for any comments he made about Crybaby Kyle Rottenhouse.
shareIt’s hilarious that you can’t even defend your cult leader, Diaper Joe. Now you’re talking about someone named “Fat Donnie” for some reason. It’s quite odd.
Also if you had been falsely accused of murder and then slandered by the entire DemoKKKrat media along with the President you would have pooped yourself and would have had to be coddled by your Mommy the entire time.
Fat Donnie has told so many slanderous lies about so many people so many times, that President Biden hasn't even started to touch the tip of the Dementia Donnie lying iceberg.
shareSo then you can’t defend diaper Joe? Also I don’t know who “Fat Donnie” is but it sounds like you have a very unnatural obsession with him, seek help you loser.
EDIT: Whoever "Fat Donnie" is, whether he has lied or not has literally nothing to do with the evilness of Dementia Diaper Joe. Just another one of your pathetic deflection attempts.
"There is no point in 99% of the stuff you type, but you do it anyway."
Ironic coming from you. A self described troll. I've been watching your post count shoot up by hundreds over the past few days. Mainly on this page. Have you even made a single interesting or relevant post on anything else? Or are you only capable of replying to every comment made by posters you think you have superior opinions to?
You're so predictable. You're like a moth to a flame with only the most basic brain function. It's really quite sad. You can play bingo with your responses. "mush for brains senile judge hurrr durr". Do you have a word document with all your nonsense ready to copy and paste from? You're trolling is such low effort.
Get a hobby.
Says the troll with 1899 posts.
You don't even know the definition of "irony," you just heard Fucker Carlson use the word a few times & you thought it sounded good.
Troll posts make up about 4% of my posts. You will see I contribute to countless other pages.
Whereas you're still just a sad little troll obsessed with Kyle, sitting in your parent's basement. I pity you.
More deflection from the facts.
I won't tell you where, I'll let you try to figure it out for yourself, but this sentence needed a semi colon.
AMEN, Bro! You stole my thunder! Also, since the idiotic Democrat Governor refused to send the National Guard to help keep order, there is BLOOD on his hands.
🤨
The AR-15 was a phallic substitute for Young Crybaby Kyle Rottenhouse.
shareYeah, you really seem to have a phallic obsession.
shareHe keeps talking about dicks, licking, sucking - and specially the one of his sex idol, DT
share "[. . .] licking, sucking - and specially [. . .]"
Oh my. I see we need to work on the em-dash next.
(A hyphen separated by a space on either side was not the punctuation mark I would have expected from an unrecognized genius, such as yourself. )
Oh, we go back to punctuation when you have NOTHING to say?
shareWell, you are always telling me how dumb I am and how smart you are, so I was just checking to see if I could offer someone as smart as you are a little help.
sharewell, if we are talking about help, have you EVER heard of em dashes??? Google is your friend.
here is a synopsis: "Em dashes are often used to mark interruptions within sentences. They can be used with or without spacing."
And no, I'm not a genius, but you sure are dumb :D
What you typed (with or without spaces) was a hyphen.
The em dash is also known as the long dash.
But if that is the way you did it back where you immigrated from, who am I to argue with you.
And it takes a genius to figure out what was the intent, right? And we know that you are not a genius so no wonder...
As I was saying, when you have NOTHING to say ...
"And it takes a genius to figure out what was the intent, right? And we know that you are not a genius so no wonder...
As I was saying, when you have NOTHING to say ..."
Ah, so now it's only the intent that matters?
Unlike an 'e' for 'u' typo?
That is certainly an interesting statement from someone as smart as you are.
Those last two sentences are interesting. Almost as if you couldn't make up your mind how you wanted to format that ellipsis you placed at the end of each sentence. You know, the sentences that you didn't feel needed to be terminated with a period prior to the ellipsis.
But, being you are so smart, I am sure that there was a reason behind it.
No idiot, the reason for which I was doing that research was to see if you are full of shit and to correct my possible mistake, if needed.
As I was saying on another thread: I'm not afraid to admit when I make mistakes and sometime I might learn something.
That alone and makes me smarter than your stubborn dumb egotistical brain.
Btw, beside dementia are you hunted by a bit of alzheimer's?? I see that the memory fails you as well, it wasn't me that spotted that "typo" (lol). Weird for someone so young to have so many problems ...
PS: answering both your posts.
"[. . .]are you hunted by a bit of alzheimer's?? I see[. . .]"
No, I have never been "hunted" by Alzheimer's.
(And, for your own knowledge base, "Alzheimer's" needs to be capitalized.)
And yes, it was movie chatter box who had to point that typo out for your enjoyment.
And obviously all those archaic websites that you dredged up didn't help you as you continually make the same error(s).
But you are a genius in disguise, so I know there is a reason for it.
(You want to remain in disguise.)
I know that you are dumb beyond imagination (and I have a wild one) but to call a 2020-2022 edition book archaic it's a bit too much ...
https://www.amazon.com/Associated-Press-Stylebook-2020-Briefing/dp/1541647572/
You should buy it, enlarge your horizon. Although might be a bit too expensive for you, but I swear it's worth 2h of your paycheck ...
No thanks, I'll stick to MLA.
shareAP style:
https://www.bkacontent.com/ap-style-how-to-use-ellipses/
"An ellipsis … consists of three periods."
"If the ellipsis follows a grammatically complete sentence, place a period after the last word preceding the ellipsis, and insert a space between this period and the ellipsis.
Example:
Ellipses can be tricky. … Use with care."
Obviously too tricky for you. You still haven't figured out the part about the period at the end of a "grammatically complete sentence." That could be because you have yet to figure out how to write a grammatically complete sentence.
"are you hunted by a bit of alzheimer's??"
Is it possible that you are being "hunted" by Alzheimer's?
Wait, who the fuck are you?
share"Btw, beside dementia are you hunted by a bit of alzheimer's?? I see that the memory fails you as well, it wasn't me that spotted that "typo" (lol). Weird for someone so young to have so many problems ..."
Did you learn how to write this one (I like the part about being "hunted" by Alzheimer's (which you failed to capitalize) from your AP writing handbook? If you did, you should request your money back.
I am sure that you are going to dig up some archaic off the wall web site for this one, so it probably wouldn't do you any good to quote chapter & verse from a legitimate collegiate Grammar & Comp book, would it?
Let me know if you want me to.
In the mean time, here is the very first link I clicked on:
https://punctuationmarks.org/em-dash/
And again, that was not an em dash you typed, that was a hyphen.
"And no, I'm not a genius, but you sure are dumb :D"
No, you are definitely a genius. those emogies you are always using prove it.
Vile Rottenlouse.
shareYou forgot Alec Baldwin.
shareThis.
shareThe gun is just a tool. It can be used for a variety of purposes. In fact, all over the civilized world it is mostly used for fun.
Yeah, I'm afraid it just doesn't work that way. There's always that pesky Constitution to contend with. You know, that outdated document that allows you to sit here and say stupid shit?
shareI totally support the 2nd Amendment and the Constitution. The Militia (i.e. National Guard) definitely has the right to own muskets (the kind of gun that existed when written). As for Vile Rottenlouse: GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY!
share"The Militia (i.e. National Guard) definitely has the right to own muskets (the kind of gun that existed when written)."
I bet that argument killed on the playground during recess.
The national guard is jot the militia.
shareWhat about Alec Baldwin? He also had a gun.
share
You're a fucking moron! The point of having a gun is SELF DEFENSE, and that's what Rittenhouse did!
Rittenhouse was found NOT GUILTY on all counts And this is GREAT NEWS because it confirms our constitutional right to defend ourselves against thugs and criminals like Antifa! And YOU are guilty of SLANDER!
As to the rest of your moronic rant, how can you be so fucking stupid? Were you dropped on your head when you were
a child?
🤨
Well, the original intention of gun ownership according to founders of the constitution was to defend yourself against a tyrannical government.
It really wasn't meant for weekend warriors to slaughter each other with. But it wasn't that long ago when men settled their differences with a gun duel. I for one am glad we don't have this today. We have it so much better in this day and age. lol...
Yeah, but the Founding Fathers were rather short-sighted concerning the technological development of firearms in the future from their time.
I mean, back when the "right to bear arms" was written into the Constitution, those arms were things like flintlock pistols and similar basic, slow and unwieldy weapons with almost no accuracy to them, and not much of a threat so duels were necessary.
I'm sure that if the Founding Fathers saw the much more advanced weapons that exist now like six-shooter revolvers, machineguns, shotguns, and rocket launchers, they'd BALK at what they started!
The same could be said about the First Amendment as it pertains to technological advances in media: TV, Internet, etc.
shareAmendments don't become obsolete just because technology improved. It doesn't matter how advanced the weapon is, that never factored into the second amendment. They made the 2nd so that people could defend themselves.
If the founding fathers saw the weapons we have today, they'd be even more solidified in their decision. All those weapons you mentioned? The government has access to all of them via the military. Times may change, but people still deserve the right to defend themselves from tyrannical governments, government thugs, and terrorists.
Personally, I feel that is a flawed argument. It relies on the fallacy that the Founding Fathers had not witnessed and were stupid enough not to anticipate any kind of technological advancement in weaponry whatsoever. It requires ignoring thousands of years of advancements in weapons. Not to mention, when the second amendment was written, "assault weapons" already existed (Girardoni air rifle, Pepperbox revolvers, Puckle gun & Belton flintlock)
When you look at the second amendment, it is actually very intelligently written to include technological advancements in weapons.
Fair enough.
Exactly! They didn't want to safeguard our right to own flintlocks. They wanted to safeguard our ability to change our government and effectively defend ourselves. Hence the use of the generic term "arms". Only liberal idiots with no perspective are able to twist it into whatever fits the agenda.
shareIt doesn't mean you can use them to force your way into government sponsored no go zones.
shareHello, police??? Yes, there are rioters outside my family business setting it on fire. Yes, I know. I can see your officers standing across the street doing nothing.
shareI agree. There is now the provocation conundrum. If a guy is threatening a gun owner, has a gun owner provoked a violent response by pulling out their gun? The prosecutor in the Rittenhouse trial even said that Rittenhouse brought a gun to a fistfight and the other prosecutor said that getting roughed up in a barfight isn't too bad. In some of these states, you have to be in your home to be able to use your gun. If the lefties succeed in defunding the police, citizens will need to carry guns in order to protect themselves.
https://nypost.com/2021/11/15/prosecutors-use-road-house-photo-in-kyle-rittenhouse-trial/
They are not going to succeed in defunding the police, that is a fantasy. Just look at the skyrocketing crime rates lately with just less police around. Having no police would be anarchy. Hey, maybe that's what they want though.
shareMaybe pointing it at peaceful protesters?
share