Is the Judge on the Rittenhouse defense team? - Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion

[–] Padeen (6459) 3 years ago

I'd really like to hear why you think that? From what I've read, this Judge has an excellent reputation.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

Did you watch the prosecution trying to cross examine Crybaby Kyle today?
That would be the answer to your question.
I am surprised that senile sounding old fuck didn't just go ahead & set Crybaby Kyle free!

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 3 years ago

Yeah, I did watch it. From what I saw, the Judge scolded the Prosecution for a constitutional violation, which is his job. If anything, the Prosecution are the ones acting completely unprofessional and desperate, probably because they see where this trial is going.

reply

[–] triplea (3577) 3 years ago

Toys are starting to be thrown out of the cot i see.

The prosecution were acting against the constitution. But I guess that's ok?

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

Here is my imitation of Rittenhouse on the stand:

"BOOOO HOOOO BOOOO HOOOO BOOOO HOOOO, waaaaaaa!!!!!!!"

reply

[–] triplea (3577) 3 years ago

Will you accept the ruling if he is judged innocent?

I'll accept if it comes back guilty.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

If he is judged innocent, I'll accept that it means that I can wander around with an AR & take pot shots at people. The NRA would probably be on board with that.

reply

[–] triplea (3577) 3 years ago

I get the impression you don't have much experience with firearms.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

You get the wrong impression.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

In fact, after listening to that crybaby punk on the stand today, I'd bet that I know way more about firearms than Rittenhouse does.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

But I don't get mine out & go to the nearest riot looking for a firefight.

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

So, it was a riot, and not a protest?

And, as rioting is an aggressive act, you can't claim it wasn't self defense when the whole mob of rioters tried to assault him.

reply

[–] TerraFirma69 (2269) 3 years ago

"So, it was a riot, and not a protest?"

Interesting that you didn't get a reply to that. Oopsie!

reply

[–] Topcat81 (222) 3 years ago

immattj do you pee sitting down? Typical leftist soyboy, you'll can dish it out but you'll cant take it. I hope to God kyle gets off because I want to see you antifa creeps just try to riot over the verdict.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

I only pee sitting down when I am sitting on your mom's face. The old bag seems to enjoy it.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13848) 3 years ago

🔥(burn)

🥃(I'll drink to that)

reply

[–] Topcat81 (222) 3 years ago

Bloodshot, I can only imagine whose bodily fluids you're drinking. Probably from a trick named Jim.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13848) 3 years ago

Not funny. Try harder.

reply

[–] Topcat81 (222) 3 years ago

I'm laughing. You nasty whore you.

reply

[–] Topcat81 (222) 3 years ago

If you peed on my mom's face, she'd have aids right now. Meaning: You have Aids.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

The old bag has AIDS then.
Tell her I am sorry about that.

reply

[–] triplea (3577) 3 years ago

I think he demonstrated his effectiveness and ability to defend himself.

You come off as more an agressor, so it's more likely you'd end up on the other side of this mess.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

Hardly.
As I typed a couple of minutes ago, I don't get my stuff out of the safe & go looking for firefights.
When I am not at the range or in the field, it is for home defense.
MY HOME, & that of my CLOSE neighbors.

reply

[–] RogueDemonHunter (2684) 3 years ago

Oh, so if someone comes into your home or your neighbour's and points and gun at you, it's OK for you to shoot them?

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 3 years ago

If you knew about firearms you wouldn't be talking the way you do. You're a funny troll.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

That's amusing. I'll be happy to educate you whenever you want me to.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2239) 3 years ago

Another retard off to my ignore list.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13848) 3 years ago

No one, and I mean no one, actually gives a fuck. I hope you have no one to talk to, at the end of the day.

reply

[–] ProgsReturn (2097) 3 years ago

Who do you think you are? Alec Baldwin?

reply

[–] CrabgrassWilly (1616) 3 years ago

Hell no I won’t accept it if he’s ruled innocent. I need to get the new PS5!

reply

[–] asom (6870) 3 years ago

You in Chicago??? Let's join forces ... I need some new Nike shoes. And a PS5!!!
Maybe a new iPhone/iPad as well ...

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 3 years ago

Why Chicago?

reply

[–] asom (6870) 3 years ago

There's where the big party will be, heard it from a friend ;)

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 3 years ago

Why Chicago though? Is it because Rittenhouse is from Illinois? I don't get how rioters and looters pick their targets.

reply

[–] strntz (12473) 3 years ago

When I riot and loot, I always pick the stores that have a finer and more complete selection of goods, hopefully with a liberal exchange policy in case of one of the items I deserved is defective.

reply

[–] RogueDemonHunter (2684) 3 years ago

How long until something like that turns up in a Babylon Bee article I wonder?
"Yeah, so I looted this a couple of weeks ago and it's actually the wrong size. I want to change it for the correct size"
"Yes. No problem sir. I can exchange that for you"

reply

[–] strntz (12473) 3 years ago

LOL. SNL could do such a sketch but then it would go against their "sensibilities".

reply

[–] CrabgrassWilly (1616) 3 years ago

Strangely enough, I do live in Chicago. I’ve found that all the best protesting happens on Michigan Avenue

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13848) 3 years ago

Get a brain while you're at it. When they were handing out brains you thought they said trains. Go ahead I'll catch the next one.

reply

[–] asom (6870) 3 years ago

Neah, I only get things that I need.

Since you need one you can join us.

reply

[–] PrimeMinisterX (8761) 3 years ago

This case should've never even gone to trial. It's clear-cut self-defense.

Kyle has been victimized twice now -- once on the streets of Kenosha and second time by the United States government. And that's not even to mention the assholes talking shit with their "public opinion."

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

Crybaby Kyle will probably claim he is a victim when he is some one's bitch in the near future.

reply

[–] RogueDemonHunter (2684) 3 years ago

You seem to be awfully obsessed with this train of thought. Sounds like you have some issues you need to work through. Were you molested or raped? As it seems you're projecting. Have you considered professional counselling?

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

Your mom tried to rape me but I was able to fight the old whore off.

reply

[–] Threadkiller (3080) 3 years ago

Yep. Not being too particularly subtle about it either. A typical SWS good ol' boy judge like this is going to do whatever he can to ensure Killer Kyle Rottenhouse gets as little of a slap on the wrist as possible.

reply

[–] SuperMangua (74) 3 years ago

So the judge might be an evil Republican Boomer, like all Boomers. This is bad news. Trial might be rigged.
Business owners and mega giant corporations have a reason to be on the side of vigilantes blowing people away and obliterating human beings as long as Saint Product and the Holy Dollar are being guarded and patrolled by gun toting mentally ill maniacs like this murderous lunatic!

reply

[–] Topcat81 (222) 3 years ago

Better to be a republican boomer than some libtard asswipe democrap. Why would the trial be rigged? If elections arent rigged, according to democraps, why would this trial be?

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

It's looking increasingly likely that the prosecution are on the defense team.

I mean, just because its obvious he acted in self defense, it doesn't mean the prosecution should just give up so easily.

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 3 years ago

NO...THE PROSECUTION IS SOMEHOW MADE UP OF MORONS.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

So is this forum.
You are a perfect example.

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 3 years ago

AWW...HIM THINKS HE'S FUNNY...VERY CUTE.

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

I think your all posts in all caps are somewhat amusing.
And a perfect example of my point.

reply

[–] Kendricks (2239) 3 years ago

You seem upset about that.
Even if they would be brilliant - Kyle is clearly not guilty, it is all on tape from all angles, the witnesses (even those that should be against him) make it clear.

It was clear the first time I've seen the first footage that this was textbook self defense.
If this kid does not walk, you should worry...

reply

[–] Kowalski (76313) 3 years ago

I REALLY DO NOT CARE...WASN'T EVEN AWARE OF WHO THIS KID WAS UNTIL I CLICKED A FEW THREADS HERE...TRIAL HAPPENED TO BE ON MY FATHER'S TV THE OTHER DAY...I HEARD A FEW MINUTES...THE PROSECUTION SOUNDED RIDICULOUS...THAT IS MY ONLY INVOLVEMENT.

reply

[–] Adam60z (3774) 3 years ago

Definitely the 75 year old Reptilian is in bed with the rightwing defense. The prosecution is doing a great job, which is why the judge is so mad.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/politics-policy/sobbing-kyle-rittenhouse-won-before-ruling-rcna5114
He needs to recuse himself and have an objective judge preside. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/bruce-schroeder-kyle-rittenhouse-judge-phone-b1955443.html

reply

[–] asom (6870) 3 years ago

WHat an idiot, that "professor", the author.

"If Rittenhouse is convicted, he will likely stop being a right-wing mascot and become a right-wing martyr." - how the fuck is KR winning if he is sent to jail for life?? What a moron ...

"His supporters have basically guaranteed those outcomes." - no idiot (the author) - you did.

reply