Infowars files for bankruptcy after defamation suits

That's rich, coming from a Nazi hypocrite.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23120

Here's a link to the scientific consensus among anthropologists.

And here's a link to the Human Genome Project:

https://archive.is/oQ5ut

QED, scientific consensus established. Nobody cares about your altcensored nonsense videos, you Nazi dumbass, nor am I going to click on any of that BS.

"The ones in Eastern Europe or East Asia overwhelmingly acknowledge it."

Again, no valid sources or proof whatsoever. We both know why you can't link to scientific journals.

Also, Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia lolz... The East Asians used to be considered white in the 17th century and Slavs weren't considered white by you Nazi geniuses as far back as 50 years ago... For example, Nazis wanted to kill 50-100% of Slavs based on their nationality, enslave (they had approximately 10-20 million slave during the war) and ethnically cleanse the rest. There are still Nazis that believe Slavs aren't white.

...

Anything that can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Hitchen's razor. Again with the false analogies. Nothing that you wrote is true, nor does it demonstrate races exist. Humans don't have subspecies and the last work to claim that was published almost 50 years ago (in 1974). There's only one species and that's Homo sapiens.

So-called "foreign aid" is just a tool to penetrate new markets so US corporations can expropriate wealth, steal natural resources and exploit the local populations.

For example, in Cuba:

"Back in power and receiving financial, military and logistical support from the United States government, Batista suspended the 1940 Constitution and revoked most political liberties, including the right to strike. He then aligned with the wealthiest landowners who owned the largest sugar plantations, and presided over a stagnating economy that widened the gap between rich and poor Cubans. Eventually it reached the point where most of the sugar industry was in U.S. hands, and foreigners owned 70% of the arable land. As such, Batista's repressive government then began to systematically profit from the exploitation of Cuba's commercial interests, by negotiating lucrative relationships both with the American Mafia, who controlled the drug, gambling, and prostitution businesses in Havana, and with large U.S.-based multinational companies who were awarded lucrative contracts."

Earl E.T. Smith, former U.S. Ambassador to Cuba, testified to the U.S. Senate in 1960 that, "Until Castro, the U.S. was so overwhelmingly influential in Cuba that the American ambassador was the second most important man, sometimes even more important than the Cuban president." In addition, nearly "all aid" from the U.S. to Batista's government was in the "form of weapons assistance", which "merely strengthened the Batista dictatorship" and "completely failed to advance the economic welfare of the Cuban people".

"Haiti is poor due to low intelligence of it's inhabitants."

The only one of low intelligence is you. It's written "its" in this case, not "it's", which is a contraction of "it is".

And no, I haven't watched that documentary, that's a fact I've known and no amount of Nazi videos are going to change that. If it weren't for the American Civil War, something similar would've happened in the South as well. Which is why support among Southern conservatives to invade, colonize and spread slavery to other countries (because they couldn't spread it to new territories) was at its highest just before the start of the American Civil War (the Manifest Destiny bullshit).

Entirely due to natural resources... Why do you think the US is rich? Or that various European countries are rich? Because they stole natural resources from others. The Nazis tried to colonize half of Europe. The British looted 45 trillion dollars from India.

Let's blockade Great Britain and pressure them into paying back 45 trillion dollars to India. India, where a 100 million people died in the period of 1949-1979 alone due to economic liberalization, and tens of millions after. Before that, in the 19th century, there were various famines attributed to colonial rule, like never before in history.

Fascists are to be tolerated up until the point they instruct their followers to resort to violence. Then they are to be suppressed, by violent means if necessary.

Karl Popper:

Less well known [than other paradoxes] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

You have a habit of making claims with no evidence. Sad thing is I believe you feel more sympathy for Alex Jones than you do the victims of Sandy Hook.