MovieChat Forums > Prince Harry Discussion > Do women find him attractive?

Do women find him attractive?


Well?

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

Personally, I think the brothers are nice looking, but nothing to write home about.

reply

"They"?

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

He and William.Neither of their parents were stunning. Di was pretty, but come on.

reply

No chance Charles is Harrys father

reply

Get real, he could pass for Phillip's twin. Check out Phillip in his younger days.

reply

HAhahahahahaha. Can I please have some of what you are smoking ! If even he were Harrys dad (he's not). They look nothing alike. Harry even admitted that when addressing the rumors(that he tried to discredit)

reply

He was good-looking as a young man, but damn. Age hits the Windsor men like a runaway freight train!

reply

More importantly than the looks, I think women are off-put by his whine-fest.

His "problems" are not relatable to the common folk. He has resources to deal with them.

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

I read his horrible book, and that guy has FAR worse problems than his propensity for whining! I actually wonder if he's got a sub-functional IQ or one of the nastier personality disorders, after having a look inside his head, a look that he thinks makes him look good!

He's lucky he found a climber who wanted to marry her way onto the A-List. Believe me, nobody else would have him.

reply

I don't think it matters what women think of him now that he's happily married.

reply

Since he and Meg are trying to monetize their fame, then yes, it matters what people think of him, especially women. If he wants to regain even a fraction of his former popularity, then getting his looks back would be Step 1, so Meg really ought to be sending him to a gym and a hair restoration specialist, and limiting the amount of tequila he's allowed. (And yes, I know that no wife should ever treat a grown-ass husband like that, but having read his awful book I found he's a weird and immature grown man who really does need to be told what to do.)

And once he's got a bit of the hot back, the next step would be to do something worthwhile with his time! Be photographed building Habitat for Humanity houses for the poor or planting Greenbelt trees in Kenya, anything other than sitting around his Montecito mansion whining about his lot in life.

reply

Otter, are women really that shallow? Do women *only* sympathise with men who appeal to the female gaze?

Then again, I suppose the sad truth is a lot of my male brethren are the same with women (i.e. they will simp for the most beautiful women, but any woman who fails to give them a hard-on will be derided as 'evil', 'shrill', 'ugly', 'malign' and a 'Karen' *sigh* 🙄🤦‍♂️).

People tend to say I'm good-looking, and at the risk of sounding arrogant, I believe them (most people think I'm younger than I am, especially when I'm wearing a hat, and no-one can see the grey in my hair), but I instinctively relate to the homely and ugly. The homely and ugly need to rise up with pride, and strike back at the pretty people and the privileges that prettiness buys them.

I'm against white privilege and male privilege, but why isn't pretty privilege (for men and women) held to account? Why do we only simp for people who appeal to our gaze?

reply

I totally agree about pretty privilege. I had a supervisor who grew up with a lot of advantages based on her physical appearance and she was hell to work for because of it.

Decades earlier, I taught preschool with a woman who noticeably favored the pretty girls and cuter boys. So much so that she often passed on her children’s outgrown clothing to them despite the fact that they came from families with above average means. Meanwhile, children who could have really used this opportunity were passed over.

And don’t get me started on college girls using their looks to get better grades and to get excused from work they didn’t want to do.

reply

That makes a lot of sense, I guess I didn't know that they were marketing themselves for a career. What are they planning on doing? Other than the current book sales of course, it's not like he can write a sequel to it, do they plan on doing something big?

reply

Okay, I've been paying too much attention to them, so FYI: Yes, they are trying to turn their fame into money. Harry inherited millions from his mother, and while the income from that would cover a perfectly comfortable lifestyle, it isn't enough to fund a huge mansion in Montecito, private jets everywhere, couture wardrobes, and playing keeping-up-with-the-Joneses when Oprah Winfrey lives down the street.

So, they need to bring in income, and so they signed deals with Netflix and Spotify and son on, have produced nothing but a podcast from her and a reality show from them both, neither of them breaking ratings records (as far as I know the primary audiences were hate-watchers). The only financial success they've had on their own is Harry's book, which sold like a mofo, but which was widely derided. I mean I got a library copy, and it convinced me that Harry is some kind of psycho, so fucked-up that I can't even begin to play armchair psychologist! My comments are all over this board if you're interested, but mainly, the money from a best-selling book won't maintain their extravagant lifestyle for long. So, they've got to find new ways to bring in money, lots and lots of money...

reply

"Happily"?

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

He seems quite happy with her.

reply

There are loads of vids on youtube that convince me he’s not really happy with her. But it’s what they chose and now they are stuck with it, else end up alone with nothing. Like the late Duke and Duchess of Windsor, living a shallow, pathetic existence.

reply

Spot on.

I think there's a tendency for most people to see themselves as 'the victim,' and admittedly Harry's role is a rather thankless one (and unlike Anne, Randy Andy and Edward, he had no-one his own age who understood his conflicted position as a man of immense privilege but little real purpose). Still, none of that excuses the clueless whining and self-pity. If he owned his own mistakes (e.g. the Hitler costume, calling a colleague a 'P-word', and his generally feckless behaviour) he'd generate a lot more sympathy among the majority of the population than playing a faux-victim. Then again, there are certain generations (i.e. younger Millennials and Gen Zers) who only seem able to relate to individuals who also see themselves as innately 'oppressed'. Anyone who is matter-of-fact about their own privileges is treated as a complacent symbol of the patriarchy/white privilege, and so the super-privileged feel compelled to create a 'victim narrative'.

reply

His uncle was Andy was good looking too eons ago. But like you say, sometimes time can be harsh to people. Beauty fades, charm and personality, and humanity do not.

reply

Uncle Andy is still moderately handsome for an older guy... on the outside anyway. All rot and corruption within, of course, and there's more than bone structure to actually being attractive.

reply

I find him very plain and average-looking, and the beard makes him look scungy. The balding top makes him look older. He looks like the kind of guy you'd normally find working at the counter at a gas station or fast-food joint.

Of course, certain women certainly found his title and money attractive, if not his looks.

reply

It seems these days there are a lot of balding men even in their mid 20s!

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

That's the sad part. He's not in his 20s, but he's also not even 40 yet, and is growing thin on top already. It appears the Windsors don't age very well. That, and the Queen had a very strong rule on not using plastic surgery or any age-defying treatments in any part of her family. She apparently wanted to keep everything natural, even going so far as not dyeing her hair.

reply

To be fair now, that is a good rule from the Queen. I'd rather age gracefully than look like Michael Jackson, Joan Rivers or (ugh!) Madonna. Too many times plastic surgery makes it look obvious. It should be subtle.

--Michael D. Clarke

reply

I figured it out because one time, years ago, someone tried airbrushing the wrinkles out of her face on an official portrait made of her. The Queen got mad and demanded they re-do the portrait, wrinkles and all.

reply

A lot of aristocrats are quite good-looking, contrary to what you may have heard/read.

Have you seen Charles Spencer's daughters (i.e. Harry and William's cousins)? They look like movie stars (better-looking than a lot of modern movie stars in fact, and healthier too because they're classically good-looking but not super-skinny).

https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/royal-style/20220725146343/lady-kitty-spencer-wears-black-lace-dress-instagram/

https://www.insider.com/lady-amelia-spencer-princess-diana-niece-2023-3

https://www.gala.de/royals/briten/amelia---eliza-spencer--prinzessin-dianas-wilde-nichten-sind-los--22393200.html

Princess Madeleine of Sweden is a genuine royal hottie:

https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/445012006903526155/

https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f234/princess-madeleines-fashion-and-style-part-1-september-2003-ausgust-12-2009-a-817.html

https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=183065&d=1124607594

reply

Some women might find his status, fame and money attractive...

Am I being unfair (to Harry and some women...)?

reply

I think he's homely and has awful pointy teeth.

reply

I will transition to answer this.

He's butt ugly. Only thing that makes him attractive to some is his wallet.

Transition reversed.

What the fuck are all these cans of Bud Light doing in my living room?

reply