It's November 13th in Michigan, and it's 9°...
...And she's preaching global warming. This bitch can suck my ass.
shareApparently you don't understand the difference between weather and climate. This young girl is smarter than you.
shareNo she's not. She's just been brainwashed better.
share[deleted]
Scientists can't even accurately predict the weather for tomorrow, let alone the climate 12-50 years from now.
shareYou can predict increased chances of a crash when you spot a damaged wheel. Doesn't mean you know when or where or how.
shareLoony Lefties have been crying "The sky is falling" for decades. And I'm talking about "scientists."
Here are a few headlines from a hundred years ago or more:
• 1895 - Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895
• 1902 - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times
• 1912 - Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912
• 1923 - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune
• 1923 - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post
So Gollum's -- I'm sorry -- I mean Greta's doomsday whining is nothing new.
I wonder what their explanation is on how the polar ice caps formed.
shareSorry Wuchak, you don't have much credibility as a scientist. But thanks for posting your google search results!
shareI'm not a scientist and never said I was (although my brother is), but I don't need to be in order to cite the documented conflicting theories of "scientists" bought by Leftwingers who keep claiming the sky is falling through the decades.
There's a reason the less ignorant amongst us responds to their dubious claims (not to mention their curious secular religion) with "Yeah, right." And their current strategy of using a brainwashed Gollum-like 16 year-old girl as their puppet for propaganda doesn't help.
If someone tells you there is a green flame and someone else tells you there is an orange flame then the correct response would be to start looking for a Fire extinguisher.
Another glaring possibility is that the flame was always there and isn't anything new. For instance, there was an ice age and it had zero to do with human activity. This isn't to say that we shouldn't be wise stewards of the planet, which is why my family -- and community in general -- doesn't litter and we recycle, etc.
I also have a problem taking a group of people at their word who often can't predict tomorrow's weather, let alone what it's going to be like 12, 50, 100 years from now, especially when their proposed changes (more like annoyingly haughty demands) include needlessly blowing gazillions of tax-payer dollars and absurd ideas about preventing cow farts, not using planes and so forth (rolling my eyes).
When the loony Left's top Climate Change "experts" are a former bartender (AOC) and a mechanically angry high school sophomore, only a fool takes it seriously.
[deleted]
It's great that you don't litter and recycle but the exhausts from our machines are important, too. I don't see how being obnoxious about a real issue makes that issue going away. That goes for climate activists and their opponents alike.
shareWell said.
Its a funny thing about humans, we think we are highly intelligent but then someone had the bright idea to use asbestos as insulation.
Temperatures broke records, with the coldest temperature ever recorded at −30 °F (−34 °C) on January 31, 2019. Wind chills got dangerously low as −58 °F (−50 °C) on January 30, 2019.
share"Apparently you don't understand the difference between weather and climate."
Whenever there's a heat wave, the warmists are always very quick to point out how it supports their claim. However, whenever you mention an episode of unusually cold weather, it's "you don't know the difference between weather and climate!" It's hard to tell if they're being hypocrites or are just stupid.
Weather is the daily manifestation of climate, something that Greta and other climate hysterics don't seem to understand. They are not as smart as you.
"unusually cold weather"
So good you're able to answer your own questions!
Whenever there's a heat wave, the warmists are always very quick to point out how it supports their claim. However, whenever you mention an episode of unusually cold weather, it's "you don't know the difference between weather and climate!" It's hard to tell if they're being hypocrites or are just stupid.
I noticed this too; good point. share
If Trump changed his name to Obama would you heap praise on him and love him? Of course not because aside from the new name he would be the same... that is just like "climate change" that was originally "global warming "... the same facts are underlying climate change and they were wrong before so why do idiots think they are true now? The state of Florida didn't sink beneath the ocean so just accept it was BS and stop believing in the big hoax... remember the origination of global warming was a scientist that made up the data.
shareLOL The idiots in charge changed the name because they were WRONG. Provably WRONG. Climate Change, Global Warming, or Shit Snax, whatever you name it, it is BS.
share[deleted]