MovieChat Forums > Christoph Waltz Discussion > Anyone else a little dissapointed?

Anyone else a little dissapointed?


I am a huge fan of Christoph Waltz and I still am, but I am slightly dissapointed to find out he is doing a Roman Polanski movie, and regardless of how much I Love Christoph I won't be seeing it. Polanski is a great filmaker, but the fact remains that he raped a 13 year old girl and then fled the country.

I don't know, to me doing a movie with someone means you support them and I am kind of sad that Christoph Waltz would work with him. A little affected in my opinion of him right now. Not gonna lie.

Anyone else feel the same?

(please no huge debates on Polanksi's innocence or lack there of)

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by the poster

reply

Everybody is flawed. And despite I wished that Polanski would face justice in the USA. As he felt he couldn't get a fair trial there. What he did was very, very wrong true.

But also he is a gifted filmmaker. As he has an all-star cast. To work with on this movie. Should be a dandy one.

reply

Well, just imagine...you are *without a doubt* consuming goods made by people who have done far worse than polanski. Sad thing is, you will never know the kind of atrocities they have committed. Could be anyone. Could be your favorite actor or director, writer, or musician. Who knows. Stop looking at the people behind the work, and merit people solely based on the art they produce.

They are the unbiased eyes with which you should be viewing films.

reply

You might as well be disappointed in Harrison Ford, Johnny depp, evan macgregor, pierce bronson, adrian brody and many more actors, crews and studio managers. You can't isolate the man because he committed a crime. Many publicly famous people commit crimes that never come to light. It's not like he waged a war on 'terror' or something. And those people walk free with dignity !! leave the man alone

reply

Ramin_85, I understand what you are saying but I am going to respectfully disagree.

To say many people commit crimes so that makes his crime ok is complete apathy. If more people would sacrafice for what they people in (like shunning child rapists), then these crimes wouldn't be normalized. Really, I wouldn't work for a child drugger and raper, no matter how big the paycheck.

reply

It's great that she was able to move on with her life, but it doesn't negate the fact that what Polanski did was absolutely horrible. I think it's strange the way people try to make excuses for Polanski or trivialize what he did.

reply

Yes, but really not a great many people are trivialising what Polanski did. Think about it, if you compared the number of people whom call Polanski the Antichrist to those whom think that he should be granted clemency, you'll find that the former category are in significantly greater supply. He raped a girl and left the US before his final sentencing. Even his supporters acknowledge these things. Polanski is an incredibly vilified figure and I fail to see how 'people (which implies a majority in the sense that you used it)' are trying to excuse him.

You see, this is what really irritates me. People treat the viewing and production of a Polanski film to be akin to funding the Khmer Rouge while functioning under the delusion that they are being heard by only a small minority. Polanski is not some malevolent criminal overlord whom has committed large-scale acts of terrorism, he's a man who is living with a stupid mistake and the stigma of pedophilia (which technically is one that is not warranted, as he did not rape a child under the age of twelve), but people have been indoctrinated to see all crimes under a sexual banner as the worst kinds of transgressions imaginable and think that they are justified in their bilious rants because Polanski is a big man whom is bullying the little people. The only reason that Polanski was not extradited to the US was because he was a French citizen. Not because he was a director, or an artist, or some type of weird martyr, but because the French are just very stubborn people. If Polanski had just been some average schmuck, the result would have inevitably been the same: 'Up Yours, America'.

And really, that's why people are angry at Polanski. They just don't like the fact that he escaped the extra wrath of the American judiciary. I mean, if you were given an opportunity to escape prosecution and get on with your life, would you refuse it just because of mistakes past? Unless you were a pillar of virtue, then no, you wouldn't. Polanski was cowardly in his actions, but cowardice is only despised because the people whom allegedly made the more honourable decisions are now living awful lives and are jealous of the 'cowards' for being clever enough to dodge the consequences of their actions. That's it; and that is really why people hate Polanski... and I just find that pointless. Besides, it's not as though Polanski has escaped the consequences of his crime. Half the Internet community wants to kill him, for starters.

Polanski should not be pardoned, but he should be forgiven (especially as he has said sorry). His prosecution is justified, but the vindictive comments that people have made about him and the people whom work with him are COMPLETELY uncalled for.

reply