I don't know that that is true. Could have just been a lefty just taking his responsibility and running with it.
BUT, even if they did give some form of justification, the professional responsibility of the general in charge of RECRIUTMENT, is to get the numbers needed for our defense.
He should at least be honest to the congress about the conflict between trying to do DEI and the need to appeal to the traditional backbone of the us military ie, WHITE MALES.
Any group that celebrate people, by how much they are NOT a group, ie gay instead of straight, black or brown instead of white, female or trans instead of male, is clearly sending a message of being hostile to that group.
And that group is who hte US military really needs, if they want to make their recruitment goals.
That military recruitment officer needs to be fired, and replaced with someone more interested in getting the slots filled with able bodied men, and less with pushing the DEI agenda.
reply
share
CalvinJarrett (470)
6 months ago
You don't know if it's true if Congress gave some form of justification or if the general was a "lefty taking his responsibility and running with it?" That's a pretty important distinction, Corbell. If no congressional justification, he's rogue and wrong. If there is, he's following through on the will of the legislature and right.
reply
share
Corbell (10995)
6 months ago
EIther way, the point stands. The general is not neutral on the political side of the issue, and focused on his actual job of recruitment. He is a lefty partisan.
That is the point of this in the context of Project 2025.
reply
share