MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > On the edge of my seat for Trump’s next ...

On the edge of my seat for Trump’s next tweet.


LOL

With Sweeping Document Request, Democrats Launch Broad Trump Corruption Inquiry


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/us/politics/trump-obstruction.amp.html

reply

Here Are All 81 Of The Trump Associates Who House Dems Want To Hear From
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/complete-list-81-trump-associates-democrats-request-documents

Alan Garten
Alexander Nix
Allen Weisselberg
American Media Inc
Anatoli Samochornov
Andrew Intrater
Annie Donaldson
Brad Parscale
Brittany Kaiser
Cambridge Analytica
Carter Page
Christopher Bancroft Burnham
Columbus Nova
Concord Management and Consulting
Corey Lewandowski
David Pecker
Department of Justice
Don McGahn
Donald J Trump Revocable Trust
Donald Trump Jr.
Dylan Howard
Eric Trump
Erik Prince
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Felix Sater
Flynn Intel Group
Frontier Services Group
General Services Administration
George Nader
George Papadopoulos
Hope Hicks
Irakly Kaveladze
J.D. Gordon
Jared Kushner
Jason Maloni
Jay Sekulow
Jeff Sessions
Jerome Corsi
John Szobocsan
Julian Assange
Julian David Wheatland
Keith Davidson
KT McFarland
Kushner Companies
Mark Corallo
Matt Tait
Matthew Calamari
Michael Caputo
Michael Cohen
Michael Flynn
Michael Flynn Jr
National Rifle Association
Paul Erickson
Paul Manafort
Peter Smith (Estate)
Randy Credico
Reince Priebus
Rhona Graff
Rick Gates
Rinat Akhmetshin
Rob Goldstone
Roger Stone
Ronald Lieberman
Sam Nunberg
SCL Group Limited
Sean Spicer
Sheri Dillon
Stefan Passantino
Steve Bannon
Ted Malloch
The White House
Tom Barrack
Tom Bossert
Tony Fabrizio
Trump Campaign
Trump Foundation
Trump Organization
Trump Transition
Viktor Vekselberg
Wikileaks
58th Presidential Inaugural Committee

reply

Probably a bad idea to post the actual list.

reply

Why?

reply

I was concerned when I read the headline but now I see it's just a clown show.

reply

I see.

reply

But it’s always a clown show and the clowns are dangerous and corrupt.

reply

Please House Investigators add Ivanka to that list....

reply

The National Enquirer and the NRA lolz ..

These guys really do dig their own graves online don’t they? Even their tweets are criminal. LOL

reply

"Please House Investigators add Ivanka to that list...."

I find it really curious that Ivanka isn't included on that list. Why not? One of the investigations deals with self-enrichment, and she's been implicated in cutting deals with China to favorable deals on her products. She also undoubtedly has testimony to give about her husband's security clearance issues. She's also an executive of the Trump Organization, too, and there's dozens of investigations dealing with corruption there.

She's also The Donald's favorite child, so it's a given he's probably whispered sweet stories of corruption in her ear at one time or another.

reply

Ivanka, Roy Cohn, John Kelly, and others are most likely on the next 'target' list which will be released by the Dems.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-list/ivanka-trump-could-be-on-next-target-list-from-house-democrats-panel-chairman-idUSKCN1QL2BP


Then again, there's speculation (from the cable shows last night) that Ivanka may indeed be the next target of Mueller, and Dems don't want to infringe on his investigation. (Same with Kelly).

reply

"The committee said Monday’s tranche of requests would not be the last, suggesting that investigations by House Democrats could become broader still with time. For instance, panel staffers expect that Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump will receive a document request in the coming weeks. She did not receive one Monday."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-democrats-demand-documents-from-more-than-80-people-and-institutions-affiliated-with-trump/2019/03/04/51c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

reply

President Donald Trump pressured his then-chief of staff John Kelly and White House counsel Don McGahn to grant his daughter and senior adviser Ivanka Trump a security clearance against their recommendations, three people familiar with the matter told CNN. While Trump has the legal authority to grant clearances, most instances are left up to the White House personnel security office, which determines whether a staffer should be granted one after the FBI has conducted a background check. But after concerns were raised by the personnel office, Trump pushed Kelly and McGahn to make the decision on his daughter and son-in-law's clearances so it did not appear as if he was tainting the process to favor his family, sources told CNN. After both refused, Trump granted them their security clearances.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/05/politics/ivanka-trump-security-clearance-pressure/index.html

reply

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/us/politics/ivanka-trump-emoluments-businesses.html
_____________________________

Rhona Graff, President Trump’s longtime executive assistant, was asked for documents related to foreign governments providing gifts or money to Ivanka Trump or her businesses.

Anatoli Samochornov, the Russian translator who sat in on a meeting between Trump campaign officials and Russian lobbyists, was asked to hand over handwritten notes showing any capital investment from Russian entities to Ms. Trump or her businesses.

And Jeff Sessions, the former attorney general, was asked for any documents related to loans or capital investments from Russians directed to Ms. Trump.

The president’s eldest daughter and top White House adviser was notably absent from a blitz of document requests that the House Judiciary Committee sent earlier this month to 81 individuals and organizations linked to the president. House Democrats have been cautious about targeting Ms. Trump and the other Trump children as they investigate the president, worried about triggering a backlash.

But a close read of the document requests suggests they aren’t exactly tiptoeing around the first daughter, either.

Of the 81 document requests sent, 52 individuals and organizations were asked to turn over documents related to Ms. Trump or her business interests.

White House officials are viewing the document requests as an attempt by the House Judiciary Committee to set the stage for potentially impeaching the president. But the inquiries related to Ms. Trump follow a side track: They ask for documents related to any financial benefit that Ms. Trump or her businesses reaped from foreign and domestic governments after the 2016 election. And they provide a hint of how Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, may be planning to look into potential financial conflicts of interest from Ms. Trump.

_____________________________

reply

I was actually surprised Hannity and Conway (among others) are now on the list. I always figured that the reason they had their noses so far up his ass was that they were profiting. And that would be through less than noble means.

reply

Last night, Rep Nadler said that 'just over 10%' had already complied in less than 24 hours. That's quite a number in such a short period of time, which means these respondents were not only willing to cooperate, but prepared to do so as well.

reply

"The White House" ... that one might be too irrealistic an expectation xD

https://www.mercurynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/whitehousetoon04.jpg?w=720

reply

At LEAST it's not a targeted witch-hunt like what was initially feared ... oh wait.

reply

I saw a clip of Trump at CPAC trying to characterize his "Russia, if you're listening, hack Hillary's emails and release them" plea as a joke. He wasn't joking, there were follow-up questions during that press event where he was asked by Katy Tur whether it gave him pause to ask for a foreign government's help against a US citizen, and Trump did not say he was joking or being sarcastic or telling people what they wanted to hear, he unequivocally said, "No. Gives me no pause."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olyBDfHAjOk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQb2S4DIcNc&t=9s

reply

Do you prefer premium Meow-mix or just the regular kind?

reply

lol u losers love him. who even uses twitter anymore. i havent logged into that dumb site since 2013

reply

It's funny that you don't use it anymore... You still write like the lamebrains on there who can't manage to compose a coherent and properly worded sentence.

reply

lol u lamebrains 😝 and flunkies b 2 dumb 4 proper composition.

reply

take ur composition and shove up ur arsehole u bozo neeeerrrrdddd!!!!!

reply

Thank you for making my day a little brighter. HAHAHAHAHA!!!😝😝😝

reply

Damn! Banned by Twitter in 2013 ? They were just starting then - and they already figured you out to be a psycho ?

reply

i never even used the site enough to get banned. realized that its just a gayer version of facebook and instagram and never wasted any more of my life on that trash

reply

realized that its just a gayer version of facebook and Instagram and never wasted any more of my life on that trash.


An Uninspired Homophobe Reflects On His Life.

How we must hear more!

reply

jesus u cant even call something gay anymore without being called a homophobe by some social justice warrior nerd

reply

"who even uses twitter anymore"

Your President (the person you voted for)

"i havent logged into that dumb site"

Nobody has to log in to read the President's tweets, or any tweets on any twitter account unless the account is private, if your 20-year-old obsolete aol/netscape browser can't get on to twitter you need to join the year 2019 and upgrade to Chrome or Firefox etc.

reply

Long Live Netscape Navigator!!!

reply

They banned you six years ago?????

reply

why do all u homos think i got banned from twitter? twitters is so stupid they never needed to ban me to get me off that dumb site

reply

why do all u homos think i got banned from twitter?



Well, maybe it's because you still think using "homos" is anyone's idea of appropriate language, Mary.

reply

lol im not being anti homo im just calling u guys homos. go be a homo i dont care everybody is soooo sensitive these days... i miss the good ol dayz

reply

The old days before Twitter banned you, you mean.

reply

nawww im talkin the real good ol dayz. the days of myspace and limewire. runescapin after school. when calling someone a homo or a fagola was totally normal and nobody gave a shite

reply

[deleted]

go woke get broke

reply

What did you do to get banned from Twitter 6 years ago?

reply

for postin a pic of your ugly mum

reply

That doesn't get you banned. Try again...

reply

That's true. I posted her picture tons of times and never got banned.

Seriously? A "Yo Mama" retort? How stupid IS this guy?

reply

He’s so stupid if his stupidity were a planet it’d be the planet Jupiter AND its moons!

reply

Too bad his stupidity couldn't be Krypton and explode, taking his head with it.

reply

ahhh shuuuutuup u nerds!!!

reply

LOL!

reply

Let's see those taxes.

reply

Is this article from 2016,2017,2018 or 2019? It's hard to tell, because it was the same story in each of those years...and still nothing, unless you count the pools of bitter, salty, liberal tears. There are a bunch of those.

reply

No, you can’t tell the year because you don’t possess the attention span to look at the link, which contains its date, much less to read the article you’ve taken the time out of your busy day to prattle on about.

reply

... I think you missed the point of their reply ...

reply

No, they got it, but like all of the lefts blind hatred, they choose to ignore facts and embrace ignorant bitterness.

reply

I don’t hate you. I root for you.

What facts do I ignore and what else am I ignorant of? Be specific, otherwise you make my case. Please prove me wrong.

reply

No, they got it, but like all of the lefts blind hatred, they choose to ignore facts and embrace ignorant bitterness.


Do you see why this sentence structure is problematic Burk?

reply

Meh, it's a little clunky, sure. You still got my point,and it's a casual movie message board. I think I'll manage to sleep tonight.

reply

... I got his point... He’s dismissing all of the investigations because he thinks it’s always the same song and dance.

But he offers no facts nor justifies his pat dismissal in any other way. So he makes no valid point, therefore he has no point, which is why I acknowledged none.

reply

There's got to be something incriminating in all that stuff!

reply