MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Trump nominates Judge Kavanaugh to the S...

Trump nominates Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court


And there we go

reply

Should just be a few minutes or so before the left starts the attack.

reply

Already lots of protests outside waving Pro-Choice and Protect Roe v Wade stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSRkCAWpMzE

reply

good link...thanks. thats some crazy stuff going on, that one dude has a nice sign...

reply

Well,at least they waited to see if was an issue worth protesting,lol. They probably had those signs made years ago!

reply

They're on their way to interview his first grade teacher to find out if he ever sexually harassed a girl.

And of course, the low reporters on the totem pole will be assigned to sift through his garbage.

reply

Haha good call, he coaches a girls basketball team so he is screwed there.

reply

You mean Americans. The US is based on liberal ideas. Left = American.

reply

Lol, you might want to let the 2016 election know about this.

reply

The one where the Democrat got 3 million more votes than the Republican?

reply

Oh, you mean the election that was campaigned knowing that the popular vote was irrelevant? If Hillary's goal was to win the popular vote and ignore the rules and not care if she won the electoral college,then she did great,lol! Fortunately, Trump ran his campaign knowing that the popular vote didn't matter, so his strategy was aligned with the system in place. But don't let me stand in the way of you seeing facts through a bitter lens,lol.

reply

You responded to a poster who was discussing Americans, not the voting system.

reply

And I was explaining why the results were what they were. Your trying to imply that the results indicate a preference,and I'm showing you that your logic is greatly flawed. You know what you were doing,nice try though. Hate to disappoint you with facts.

reply

Republican: Nu uh! 3 million illegal/dead voters. RIGGED!!

reply

Hahaha,this from the left who can't stop whining about non-existent,and perfectly legal collusion,lol. That's the Democrats literally complaining that the results were rigged,lol. The Republicans (which I'm not) don't have to complain because they won. But thanks,I needed a good laugh.

reply

America’s founding fathers were classical liberals, meaning they favored liberty, private property, capitalism, freedom of religion, and a limited Even our most conservative founders like Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, John Adams, and Republican style of government. See definition of classical liberalism.[1][2][3]
In fact, the founding fathers of America weren’t just “liberals”, they were Republicans, Federalists, and Democrats too. They were Patriots, they were a lot of things, but one thing they weren’t were monarchists or loyalists to the crown. The father of modern political science and modern Republicanism Machiavelli said, “the governments of the people are better than those of princes” [Book I, Chapter LVIII of Livy], and in the Spirit of Montesquieu’s “Liberal” Republicanism they agreed (although they often didn’t agree on much beyond that).
I say this only as a technicality, and from a historical perspective, as the Tories, King’s men, and Loyalists (the conservatives of the day) were all but forced to choose between “The Crown” and the principles of Liberalism due to the events leading up to the Revolution and America’s victory in it.[4]
The founders shared general ideology with both major parties of today (Democrats and Republicans), but the key here is that America is a liberal nation and what we think of as “conservative” is actually liberal-conservative (like Burke, not classically truly conservative like a King to the right of Hobbes).
This can be confirmed by thinking about the “American Revolution” where our patriot founders fought the King’s men to create a Democratically-minded Liberal Republic.
After the Revolution, many conservative loyalists were forced to flee, and those who stayed weren’t always treated kindly.
Certainly, no loyalist (no true Tory, Loyalist, or King’s men; i.e. no “true” conservative) was going to have a position in the new government. The leaders of the new government would be comprised solely of Patriots.

reply

Ideology is not the same as formal political parties. The latter use ideology to unite like minded people for the purpose of gaining influence and power. Up until the 90s, both major American parties had liberal members because both parties were originally the same liberal party. Liberalism and conservatism has manifested in various ways over the centuries but it boils down to liberalism is inclusive while conservatism is exclusive. Conservatism stems from the base instinct to distrust outsiders and be more accepting of people like ourselves.

reply

I remember hearing about liberal conservatives and liberals years ago. But like you said those days are long gone. What we have now are two distinct parties that despise each other. Repubs hate Dems and Dems hate Repubs. Its a no win situation for our country. And now people get their news from opinion based outlets. Repubs think Fox news tells the truth and Dems think MSNBC tells the truth, they both can't be reporting truthful facts about the same thing. Sometimes I wonder what America would be like if Dems and Repubs worked together for the betterment of our country. Maybe someday there will be a breaking point but as things are going now, its a long ways away.

reply

I didn't say that but there were liberal Republicans. Parties change over time.

reply

They have definitely changed and changed for the worse.

reply

You mean Ron Paul? I think what you have in mind is warmongers like John McCain. He is the type considered sane moderate centrist by the corporate media.

The real history of the party of Lincoln is that they have always been a big business party. Lincoln was a railroad lobbyist. This was the start of government as the enforcer of cartels, because historically cartels never lasted on their own. The Democrats were largely libertarian, until it was co-opted by Republican defectors known as Progressives and became just another business party who wanted financial control and dependence with issues like central banking, income tax, and worldwide war. This is easy to verify because we can see that voter participation dropped sharply and has never recovered as the two parties came to mirror each other. This is ironic because the Progressives liked to talk about expanding democracy, but what they really meant was politicizing more aspects of life by giving business friendly government control over it. So many people switch parties and the two become hodgepodge of special interests.

Did you know that it was normal for mainstream Democrats to say they were against immigration in the 90? You are not even allowed to say the word illegal now. This is the party that has changed. It has become a ghetto as America shifts far left due to demographic transformation, and the remaining working class abandon Democrat for Republican. Trump is a throwback to their old ethos of get government off our backs and mind your own business, like the founding fathers wanted.

reply

Comedienne Michele Wolf made a good point:

"“I know some people call themselves ‘pro-life,’ but pro-life is a propaganda term that isn’t real, like healthy ice cream and handsome testicles,” she said on “The Break.” “Get the terminology straight.”

“First of all, these people are anti-abortion, which means they’re anti-woman. If these people were actually pro-life, they would be fighting hard for healthcare, childcare, gun control, education and protecting the environment."

She went on to say that 1 out of 4 women have had an abortion by the age of 45. I did a little more research that said 51% of abortion patients were using a contraceptive the month they became pregnant, most commonly condoms (24%) or a hormonal method (13%).

reply

Yeah. The pro life crowd doesn't seem to give a damn about children of the poor once they're born.

reply

The anti-abortion crowd will complain about the poor for having children that they can't afford after denying them the right to an abortion. It's really about controlling women. Birth control and sex ed used to be illegal in the U.S. too. Women were imprisoned fighting for the right of married women to have contraception. Imagine conservatives telling a woman with seven kids she's not entitled to birth control.

Meanwhile last week in France, Simone Veil was honored nationally with a burial in the Pantheon reserved for their most distinguished citizens. Among other things, she helped make abortion legal and is honored today throughout France.

reply

Everything government does is about controlling people. Now you see how conservatives feel about you on every other issue. You are not pro-choice for any choice other than something you don't chose anyway.

I am pro-abortion. I think we should be allowed to sell fetus for money. Pharmaceutical corporations should not be given them as free donations. Is this what you want? I don't think it is. I think you want abortion to be unaffordable and paid for by government subsidy to the health care industry. I am also anti-women. The man owns a 50% share in that fetus, and should also be able to abort child support. Women need to face consequences of their own actions like everyone else.

Remember. You are talking about people who do not know how to use a condom properly, as you said.

reply

"Remember. You are talking about people who do not know how to use a condom properly, as you said."

"...Ivana Trump Conceived Three Children While She Had an IUD... "
When it's that easy to become pregnant, then abortion is a necessity for women who can't afford it.

"The man owns a 50% share in that fetus, and should also be able to abort child support."

That's called paying for an abortion which is what Republicans do when their mistresses become pregnant.

If abortion is so upsetting to you than how come you are ignoring the hundreds of thousands of unused frozen embryos in freezers that could end up being destroyed? Because they're not in a woman and you only care about controlling women, not about embryos.

reply

You mean the pro suck the fetus out with a shop vac and throw it in a blender crowd? Thought so. If we’re going to be honest, then let’s be honest.

reply

Trumputin's supporters lost credibility when they advocated separating babies from their mothers and throwing them in cages, torturing them and emotionally damaging them.

reply

A brazenly partisan hack and hypocrite.

Just the sort Trump and the Republicans love.

reply

Indeed. Very Sad. He could be Scalia's carbon copy.

reply

Do you know any of his view other than abortion which does not affect anyone here? I came to this thread to find out and could not. It is odd.

reply

Bush just approved of the nomination, now I'm the one that's starting to freak out.

reply

I saw an NBC news clip a few days ago in which they were condemning Trump for having mocked George Bush's thousand points of light speech.

We have to keep in mind that liberals are the ones who started the Iraq war with lies about weapons of mass destruction in the New York Times. This is what I like about Trump so much, he is provoking them into revealing their views and they cannot resist. I think it is what voters are going to see in 2020 even if the Democrat candidate herself doesn't run on an openly pro-war platform like Hillary did.

reply

Bush started the war for oil. Weapons of mass destruction was his excuse. Liberals were against the war and were being called anti-American by Republicans. The only chemical weapons they would have are the ones given to them by America in its proxy war against Iran. Common knowledge.

It took years for Republicans to figure out attacking Iraq was a mistake just like it will take years for Republicans to figure out that supporting Trumputin is a mistake because of his assault on democracy and American institutions.

reply